Browse > Article

Polymorphism of Salmonella Strains Using Arbitrary-Primed Polymerase Chain Reaction  

Hwang, Eui-Kyung (Division of Applied Animal Science, Sangji University)
Kim, Sang-Kyun (Division of Applied Animal Science, Sangji University)
Kim, Yeon-Soo (Division of Animal Science, Kangwon University)
Kim, Woo-Tea (Division of Animal Science, Kangwon University)
Lee, Jeong-Koo (Division of Animal Science, Kangwon University)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Veterinary Research / v.42, no.2, 2002 , pp. 191-199 More about this Journal
Abstract
In this study, eight primers were used to detect genetic variability and phylogenetic relationships among the eighteen Salmonella strains by the arbitrary-primed PCR(AP-PCR) techniques. Five strains of Salmonella typhimurium, four strains of S entertidis, three strains of S choleraeuis, three strains of S gallinarum and three strains of S pullorum were typed by AP-PCR. The number of AP-PCR bands detected per each primer varied from 39 to 52, with an average of 43.6. A total of 349 AP-PCR bands were generated and among them, 185 bands(53.0%) were polymorphic. Among the primers, GEN 703 and GEN 708 primer showed a high level of polymorphism with 0.682 and 0.676, respectively. But GEN 603, GEN 604 and GEN 607 primer showed a low level of polymorphism with 0.404, 0.460 and 0.472, respectively. Therefore, the these primers will be the most effective for AP-PCR analysis of Salmonella strains. The level of polymorphism of S typhimurium CU 2001(0.77) was similar to that of S typhimurium CU 2002(0.77) and lower than those of other strains such as S typhimurium CU 2003(0.63), S typhimurium ATCC 14028(0.50) and S typhimurium CU 2004(0.43). The level of polymorphism of S enteritidis ATCC 13076(0.83) was similar to that of S enteritidis CU 2005(0.83) and lower than those of other strains such as S enteritidis CU 2006(0.63) and S enteritidis CU 2007(0.58). The level of polymorphism of S choleraeuis CU 2009(0.67) was similar to that of S choleraeuis CU 2010(0.67) and higher than those of other strains such as S choleraeuis CU 2008(0.53). The level of polymorphism of S gallinarum CU 2011(0.70) was similar to that of S gallinarum CU 2012(0.70) and higher than those of other strains Such as S gallinarum ATCC 9184(0.60). The level of polymorphism of S pullorum CU 2013(0.80) was similar to that of S pullorum CU 2014(0.80) and higher than those of other strains such as S pullorum No 11(0.53). Therefore, the AP-PCR analysis will be used a powerful tool for estimating genetic variation and phylogenetic relationships among Salmonella strains.
Keywords
AP-PCR; DNA marker; Genetic variation; Genetic relationship; Salmonella;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Way JS, Josephson KL, Pillai SD, et al. Specific detection of Salmonella spp. by multiplex polymerase chain reaction. Appl Environ Microbiol, 59(5): 1473-1479, 1993
2 Wlliams JGK. Kubelik AR, Licak VJ, et at. DNApolynxyphisnis arnplified by arbitrary primers areuseful as genedc maskers. Nucl Acids Res, 18:6531-6535, 1990
3 Fadl AA, Khan MI. Genotypic evaluation cf Salmonella enteritidis isolates of known phage types by arbitrarily primed polymerase chain reaction. Avian Disease, 41(3):732-737, 1997
4 Collins CH, Lyne PM. MiciDtaological method, 5th ed,Butterworths : 142-145, 1984
5 Power EG. RAPD typing in microbiology-a technical review. J Hosp Infect 34 (4):247-265, 1996
6 Cohen ND, McGruder ED, Neibergs HL, et al. Detection of Salmonella enteritidis in feces from poultry using booster polymerase chain reaction and oligonucleotide primers speeific for all members of the genus Salmonella. Poult Sci, 73(2): 354-357, 1994
7 Tuchili LM, Kodama H, Sharma RN et al. Detection of salmonella DNA in chicken embryos and environmental samples by polymerase chain reaction. J Vet Med Sci 58(9):881-884, 1996
8 Caetano-Anolles G, Bassam BJ, Gwsshoff PM. DNAamplification fingetprintiag using veiy short arbitraryoBganudeotide nhnets. BKyTechndcey, 9:553-557, 1991
9 Shangkuan YH, Lin HC. Application of random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis to differentiate strains of Salmonella typhi and other Salmonella species. J Appl Microbiol, 85(4): 693-702, 1998
10 Way JS. Josephson KL, Pillai SD, et at. Specificdetecdon of Satmonetta spp by rnuldplex polymerasechain reaction. Appl Environ Microbiol, 59(5): 1473-1479, 1993
11 Aitken SA, Tinker NA, Mather DE, et al. Genome, 37:506-508, 1994
12 Cohcn ND, Wallis DE, Neibergs HL, et al. Comparison of the polymerase chain reaction using genus specific oligonucleotide primers and microbiologic culture for the detection of Salmonella in drag-swabs from poultry houses. Poult Sci, 73(8):1276-1281, 1994
13 Molorny B, Schroeter A, Bunge C et al. Evaluation of molecular typing methods for Salmonella ehterica serovar Typhimurium DT104 isolated in Germany from healthy pigs. Vet Res 32(2); 119-129, 2001
14 Wsh J, McGelland M Hngapnmting genanss using PCRwilh ahiaay Fnmas. Nud Adds Rs. 18:7213-7219, 1990
15 Maslow JN, Mulligan ME, Arbelt RD. Molecular epidemiology: the application of contemporary techniques to typing bacteria. Clin Infect Dis, 17:153-162, 1993
16 Kwang J, Littledike ET, Keen JE. Use of the polymerase chain reaction for salmonella detection. Lett Appl Microbiol 22(1):46-51, 1996
17 Holt JG, Krieg NR, Sneath PHA, et al. Bergey's manmual of determinative bacteriology, 9th ed, Williams & Wilkins, Maryland : 186-187, 1994
18 Cohen HJ, Mechanda SM, Lin W. PCR amplification of the fimA gene sequence of Salmonella typhimurium, a specific method for detection of Salmonella spp. Appl environ microbiol, 62(12):4303-4308, 1996
19 Fabricant J, Calnek BW. Avian diseases. Cornell Vet 75(1):124-129, 1985
20 Hilton AC, Banks JG, Penn CW. Optmazation of RAPD for fingerprinting Salmonella. Lett Appl Miciobiol, 24(4):243-248, 1997