Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2012.42.3.143

Constrictive Pericarditis as a Never Ending Story: What's New?  

Sohn, Dae-Won (Cardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine)
Publication Information
Korean Circulation Journal / v.42, no.3, 2012 , pp. 143-150 More about this Journal
Abstract
Nowadays, we have a better understanding of the natural history of constrictive pericarditis such as transient constriction. In addition, we have acquired the correct understanding of hemodynamic features that are unique to constrictive pericarditis. This understanding has allowed us to diagnose constrictive pericarditis reliably with Doppler echocardiography and differentiation between constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy is no longer a clinical challenge. The advent of imaging modalities such as CT or MR is another advance in the diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis. We can accurately measure pericardial thickness and additional information such as the status of coronary artery and the presence of myocardial fibrosis can be obtained. We no longer perform cardiac catheterization for the diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis. However, these advances are useless unless we suspect and undergo work-up for constrictive pericarditis. In constrictive pericarditis, the most important diagnostic tool is clinical suspicion. In a patient with signs and symptoms of increased systemic venous pressure i.e. right sided heart failure, that are disproportionate to pulmonary or left sided heart disease, possibility of constrictive pericarditis should always be included in the differential diagnosis.
Keywords
Pericarditis constrictive; Echocardiography Doppler; Hemodynamics;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Fowler NO. Constrictive pericarditis: its history and current status. Clin Cardiol 1995;18:341-50.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Imazio M, Brucato A, Maestroni S, et al. Risk of constrictive pericarditis after acute pericarditis. Circulation 2011;124:1270-5.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Imazio M, Brucato A, Adler Y, et al. Prognosis of idiopathic recurrent pericarditis as determined from previously published reports. Am J Cardiol 2007;100:1026-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Robertson R, Arnold CR. Constrictive pericarditis with particular reference to etiology. Circulation 1962;26:525-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Bertog SC, Thambidorai SK, Parakh K, et al. Constrictive pericarditis: etiology and cause-specific survival after pericardiectomy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43:1445-52.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Ling LH, Oh JK, Schaff HV, et al. Constrictive pericarditis in the modern era: evolving clinical spectrum and impact on outcome after pericardiectomy. Circulation 1999;100:1380-6.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Masui T, Finck S, Higgins CB. Constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy: evaluation with MR imaging. Radiology 1992;182: 369-73.   DOI
8 Breen JF. Imaging of the pericardium. J Thorac Imaging 2001;16:47-54.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Maisch B, Seferovic PM, Ristic AD, et al. Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of pericardial diseases executive summary; the Task Force on the diagnosis and management of pericardial diseases of the European society of cardiology. Eur Heart J 2004;25:587-610.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Kojima S, Yamada N, Goto Y. Diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis by tagged cine magnetic resonance imaging. N Engl J Med 1999;341: 373-4.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Verhaert D, Gabriel RS, Johnston D, Lytle BW, Desai MY, Klein AL. The role of multimodality imaging in the management of pericardial disease. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2010;3:333-43.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Connolly DC, Wood EH. Cardiac catheterization in heart failure and cardiac constriction. Trans Am Coll Cardiol 1957;7:191-201.
13 Meaney E, Shabetai R, Bhargava V, et al. Cardiac amyloidosis, contrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 1976; 38:547-56.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Hatle LK, Appleton CP, Popp RL. Differentiation of constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy by Doppler echocardiography. Circulation 1989;79:357-70.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Oh JK, Hatle LK, Seward JB, et al. Diagnostic role of Doppler echocardiography in constrictive pericarditis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994;23:154-62.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Sun JP, Abdalla IA, Yang XS, et al. Respiratory variation of mitral and pulmonary venous Doppler flow velocities in constrictive pericarditis before and after pericardiectomy. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2001;14: 1119-26.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Ha JW, Oh JK, Ommen SR, Ling LH, Tajik AJ. Diagnostic value of mitral annular velocity for constrictive pericarditis in the absence of respiratory variation in mitral inflow velocity. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2002; 15:1468-71.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Sohn DW, Kim YJ, Kim HS, Kim KB, Park YB, Choi YS. Unique features of early diastolic mitral annulus velocity in constrictive pericarditis. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2004;17:222-6.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Oh JK, Tajik AJ, Appleton CP, Hatle LK, Nishimura RA, Seward JB. Preload reduction to unmask the characteristic Doppler features of constrictive pericarditis: a new observation. Circulation 1997;95:796-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Garcia MJ, Rodriguez L, Ares M, Griffin BP, Thomas JD, Klein AL. Differentiation of constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy: assessment of left ventricular diastolic velocities in longitudinal axis by Doppler tissue imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;27:108-14.
21 Reuss CS, Wilansky SM, Lester SJ, et al. Using mitral 'annulus reversus' to diagnose constrictive pericarditis. Eur J Echocardiogr 2009; 10:372-5.   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Choi JH, Choi JO, Ryu DR, et al. Mitral and tricuspid annular velocities in constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy: correlation with pericardial thickness on computed tomography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2011;4:567-75.   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Candell-Riera J, Garcia del Castillo H, Permanyer-Miralda G, Soler-Soler J. Echocardiographic features of the interventricular septum in chronic constrictive pericarditis. Circulation 1978;57:1154-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Ha JW, Oh JK, Ling LH, Nishimura RA, Seward JB, Tajik AJ. Annulus paradoxus: transmitral flow velocity to mitral annular velocity ratio is inversely proportional to pulmonary capillary wedge pressure in patients with constrictive pericarditis. Circulation 2001;104:976-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Ling LH, Oh JK, Tei C, et al. Pericardial thickness measured with transesophageal echocardiography: feasibility and potential clinical usefulness. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;29:1317-23.   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Pandian NG, Skorton DJ, Kieso RA, Kerber RE. Diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis by two-dimensional echocardiography: studies in a new experimental model and in patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 1984;4: 1164-73.   DOI
27 Chowdhury UK, Subramaniam GK, Kumar AS, et al. Pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis: a clinical, echocardiographic, and hemodynamic evaluation of two surgical techniques. Ann Thorac Surg 2006;81:522-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
28 DeValeria PA, Baumgartner WA, Casale AS, et al. Current indications, risks, and outcome after pericardiectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 1991;52: 219-24.   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Haley JH, Tajik AJ, Danielson GK, Schaff HV, Mulvagh SL, Oh JK. Transient constrictive pericarditis: causes and natural history. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43:271-5.   DOI   ScienceOn
30 Feng D, Glockner J, Kim K, et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging pericardial late gadolinium enhancement and elevated inflammatory markers can predict the reversibility of constrictive pericarditis after antiinflammatory medical therapy: a pilot study. Circulation 2011; 124:1830-7.   DOI   ScienceOn
31 Bush CA, Stang JM, Wooley CF, Kilman JW. Occult constrictive pericardial disease: diagnosis by rapid volume expansion and correction by pericardiectomy. Circulation 1977;56:924-30.   DOI   ScienceOn