Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2011.41.12.726

Eutectic Mixture of Local Anesthesia Cream Can Reduce Both the Radial Pain and Sympathetic Response During Transradial Coronary Angiography  

Youn, Young-Jin (Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Wonju College of Medicine)
Kim, Woo-Taek (Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Wonju College of Medicine)
Lee, Jun-Won (Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Wonju College of Medicine)
Ahn, Sung-Gyun (Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Wonju College of Medicine)
Ahn, Min-Soo (Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Wonju College of Medicine)
Kim, Jang-Young (Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Wonju College of Medicine)
Yoo, Byung-Su (Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Wonju College of Medicine)
Lee, Seung-Hwan (Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Wonju College of Medicine)
Yoon, Jung-Han (Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Wonju College of Medicine)
Choe, Kyung-Hoon (Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Wonju College of Medicine)
Publication Information
Korean Circulation Journal / v.41, no.12, 2011 , pp. 726-732 More about this Journal
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Radial artery spasm is one of the most common complications of transradial coronary angiography (TRA): the radial artery is prone to cathecholamine-induced contraction and radial pain during TRA could increase the sympathetic tone. The object of this study was to evaluate whether the eutectic mixture of local anesthesia (EMLA) cream, in addition to lidocaine infiltration, could reduce the sympathetic response by reducing radial pain during TRA. Subjects and Methods: Seventy-six patients were randomized 1 : 1 to either EMLA or control groups. Radial pain was measured by the visual analogue scale (VAS) and the verbal rating scale (VRS-4). Sympathetic response, including systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), pulse rate (PR), stroke volume (SV) and total peripheral resistance (TPR), was measured by photoplethysmography. Results: Radial pain measured during lidocaine infiltration was significantly lower in the EMLA group (VAS: 3.1 vs. 4.0, p=0.04; VRS-4: 2.0 vs. 2.2, p=0.03) and the sympathetic response was significantly blunted in the EMLA group from baseline to lidocaine infiltration (${\Delta}SBP,\;mm\;Hg:\;5\;vs.\;13,\;p<0.01;\;{\Delta}DBP,\;mm\;Hg:\;2\;vs.\;7,\;p=0.03;\;{\Delta}PR,\;beat/min:\;2\;vs.\;8,\;p<0.01,\;{\Delta}SV,\;mL:\;3\;vs.\;21,\;p<0.01;\;{\Delta}TPR,\;mm\;Hg\;\cdot\;L/min$: 1.0 vs. 5.9, p<0.01). Conclusion: In patients undergoing TRA, the EMLA cream, in addition to lidocaine infiltration, effectively reduces the radial pain and thereby the sympathetic response, during lidocaine infiltration.
Keywords
Anesthesia, local; Coronary angiography; Radial artery;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Fukuda N, Iwahara S, Harada A, et al. Vasospasms of the radial artery after the transradial approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty. Jpn Heart J 2004;45:723-31.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Joly LM, Spaulding C, Monchi M, Ali OS, Weber S, Benhamou D. Topical lidocaine-prilocaine cream (EMLA) versus local infiltration anesthesia for radial artery cannulation. Anesth Analg 1998;87:403-6.
3 Smith M, Gray BM, Ingram S, Jewkes DA. Double-blind comparison of topical lignocaine-prilocaine cream (EMLA) and lignocaine infiltration for arterial cannulation in adults. Br J Anaesth 1990;65:240-2.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Hjemdahl P. Plasma catecholamines: analytical challenges and physiological limitations. Baillieres Clin Endocrinol Metab 1993;7:307-53.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Olday SJ, Walpole R, Wang JY. Radial artery cannulation: topical amethocaine gel versus lidocaine infiltration. Br J Anaesth 2002;88:580-2.   DOI
6 Jolly SS, Amlani S, Hamon M, Yusuf S, Mehta SR. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention and the impact on major bleeding and ischemic events: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Am Heart J 2009;157:132-40.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Agostoni P, Biondi-Zoccai GG, de Benedictis ML, et al. Radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures; systematic overview and meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:349-56.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Goldberg SL, Renslo R, Sinow R, French WJ. Learning curve in the use of the radial artery as vascular access in the performance of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1998;44:147-52.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Hildick-Smith DJ, Lowe MD, Walsh JT, et al. Coronary angiography from the radial artery: experience, complications and limitations. Int J Cardiol 1998;64:231-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Hildick-Smith DJ, Walsh JT, Lowe MD, Shapiro LM, Petch MC. Transradial coronary angiography in patients with contraindications to the femoral approach: an analysis of 500 cases. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2004;61:60-6.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Kiemeneij F, Vajifdar BU, Eccleshall SC, Laarman G, Slagboom T, van der Wieken R. Evaluation of a spasmolytic cocktail to prevent radial artery spasm during coronary procedures. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2003;58:281-4.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Ruiz-Salmeron RJ, Mora R, Velez-Gimon M, et al. Radial artery spasm in transradial cardiac catheterization: assessment of factors related to its occurrence, and of its consequences during follow-up. Rev Esp Cardiol 2005;58:504-11.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 He GW, Yang CQ. Characteristics of adrenoceptors in the human radial artery: clinical implications. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998;115:1136-41.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Kim JY, Yoon J, Yoo BS, Lee SH, Choe KH. The effect of a eutectic mixture of local anesthetic cream on wrist pain during transradial coronary procedures. J Invasive Cardiol 2007;19:6-9.
15 Todd KH, Funk KG, Funk JP, Bonacci R. Clinical significance of reported changes in pain severity. Ann Emerg Med 1996;27:485-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Imholz BP, Wieling W, van Montfrans GA, Wesseling KH. Fifteen years experience with finger arterial pressure monitoring: assessment of the technology. Cardiovasc Res 1998;38:605-16.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Guelen I, Westerhof BE, Van Der Sar GL, et al. Finometer, finger pressure measurements with the possibility to reconstruct brachial pressure. Blood Press Monit 2003;8:27-30.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Bogert LW, van Lieshout JJ. Non-invasive pulsatile arterial pressure and stroke volume changes from the human finger. Exp Physiol 2005;90:437-46.   DOI   ScienceOn