Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2011.41.11.649

Predictors of Echocardiographic Progression in Patients With Mild Aortic Stenosis  

Seo, Jeong-Sook (Department of Cardiology, College of Medicine, Inje University, Pusan Paik Hospital)
Kang, Duk-Hyun (Department of Cardiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center)
Kim, Dae-Hee (Department of Cardiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center)
Song, Jong-Min (Department of Cardiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center)
Song, Jae-Kwan (Department of Cardiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center)
Publication Information
Korean Circulation Journal / v.41, no.11, 2011 , pp. 649-653 More about this Journal
Abstract
Background and Objectives: The factors related to the progression of mild aortic stenosis (AS) remain unknown. We wanted to evaluate the long-term outcomes and predictors of echocardiographic progression in patients with mild AS. Subjects and Methods: We prospectively included 103 consecutive asymptomatic patients (62.1${\pm}$11.9 years, 31 males) with mild AS. Mild AS was defined as aortic valve (AV) thickening accompanied by a peak aortic jet velocity (AV Vmax) $\geq$2.0 and <3.0 m/sec, and rapid progression of AS was defined as an average annual increase in the AV Vmax $\geq$0.2 m/sec, and cardiac events were defined as cardiac death or AV replacement. Results: During a median echocardiographic follow-up time of 6.0 years, the average change in the AV Vmax was 0.08${\pm}$0.10 m/sec per year. The rate of progression was significantly associated with age, moderate-to-severe AV calcification and the baseline AV Vmax, but not with the serum cholesterol level. The baseline AV Vmax (2.6${\pm}$0.3 m/sec vs. 2.2${\pm}$0.3 m/sec, respectively, p<0.001) and the incidence of moderate-to-severe AV calcification (92.9% vs. 36.5%, respectively, p<0.001) were significantly higher in the rapid progression group than in the slow progression group. The 7-year cardiac event-free survival rate was lower in the rapid progression group than in the slow pro-gression group (87.5${\pm}$8.3% vs. 100%, respectively). Conclusion: The progression of AS was slower than expected and it was re-lated to age, the baseline AV Vmax and AV calcification. Because of the marked individual variability in progression, the patients showing rapid progression of AS need closer follow-up.
Keywords
Aortic stenosis; Predictors; Prognosis;
Citations & Related Records

Times Cited By SCOPUS : 0
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Olsson M, Dalsgaard CJ, Haegerstrand A, Rosenqvist M, Ryden L, Nilsson J. Accumulation of T lymphocytes and expression of interleukin-2 receptors in nonrheumatic stenotic aortic valves. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994;23:1162-70.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Otto CM, Kuusisto J, Reichenbach DD, Gown AM, O'Brien KD. Ch-aracterization of the early lesion of 'degenerative' valvular aortic steno-sis: histological and immunohistochemical studies. Circulation 1994; 90:844-53.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 O'Brien KD, Reichenbach DD, Marcovina SM, Kuusisto J, Alpers CE, Otto CM. Apolipoproteins B, (a), and E accumulate in the morph-ologically early lesion of 'degenerative' valvular aortic stenosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1996;16:523-32.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Olsson M, Thyberg J, Nilsson J. Presence of oxidized low density lipoprotein in nonrheumatic stenotic aortic valves. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1999;19:1218-22.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Cowell SJ, Newby DE, Prescott RJ, et al. A randomized trial of intensive lipid-lowering therapy in calcific aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med 2005;352:2389-97.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Rossebo AB, Pedersen TR, Boman K, et al. Intensive lipid lowering with simvastatin and ezetimibe in aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med 2008; 359:1343-56.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Chan KL, Teo K, Dumesnil JG, Ni A, Tam J. Effect of lipid lowering with rosuvastatin on progression of aortic stenosis: results of the aor-tic stenosis progression observation: measuring effects of rosuvastatin (astronomer) trial. Circulation 2010;121:306-14.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Owens DS, Otto CM. Is it time for a new paradigm in calcific aortic valve disease? JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;2:928-30.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Ngo DT, Sverdlov AL, Willoughby SR, et al. Determinants of occurr-ence of aortic sclerosis in an aging population. JACC Cardiovasc Im-aging 2009;2:919-27.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Rosenhek R, Klaar U, Schemper M, et al. Mild and moderate aortic stenosis: natural history and risk stratification by echocardiography. Eur Heart J 2004;25:199-205.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Kang DH, Park SJ, Rim JH, et al. Early surgery versus conventional treatment in asymptomatic very severe aortic stenosis. Circulation 2010;121:1502-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Otto CM, Burwash IG, Legget ME, et al. Prospective study of asymp-tomatic valvular aortic stenosis: clinical, echocardiographic, and exercise predictors of outcome. Circulation 1997;95:2262-70.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Schiller NB, Shah PM, Crawford M, et al. Recommendations for qu-antitation of the left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography: American society of echocardiography committee on standards, subcommittee on quantitation of two-dimensional echocardiograms. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1989;2:358-67.
14 Devereux RB, Alonso DR, Lutas EM, et al. Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy: comparison to necropsy findings. Am J Cardiol 1986;57:450-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Novaro GM, Tiong IY, Pearce GL, Lauer MS, Sprecher DL, Griffin BP. Effect of hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme a reductase inhibitors on the progression of calcific aortic stenosis. Circulation 2001;104: 2205-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Skjaerpe T, Hegrenaes L, Hatle L. Noninvasive estimation of valve area in patients with aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound and two-dimensional echocardiography. Circulation 1985;72:810-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Rosenhek R, Binder T, Porenta G, et al. Predictors of outcome in severe, asymptomatic aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med 2000;343:611-7.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Aronow WS, Ahn C, Kronzon I, Goldman ME. Association of coronary risk factors and use of statins with progression of mild valvular aortic stenosis in older persons. Am J Cardiol 2001;88:693-5.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Bellamy MF, Pellikka PA, Klarich KW, Tajik AJ, Enriquez-Sarano M. Association of cholesterol levels, hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme-A reductase inhibitor treatment, and progression of aortic stenosis in the community. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40:1723-30.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Rosenhek R, Rader F, Loho N, et al. Statins but not angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors delay progression of aortic stenosis. Circulation 2004;110:1291-5.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Ryu DR, Park SJ, Han H, et al. Progression rate of aortic valve stenosis in Korean patients. J Cardiovasc Ultrasound 2010;18:127-33.   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Messika-Zeitoun D, Aubry MC, Detaint D, et al. Evaluation and clinical implications of aortic valve calcification measured by electron-beam computed tomography. Circulation 2004;110:356-62.   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Deutscher S, Rockette HE, Krishnaswami V. Diabetes and hypercholesterolemia among patients with calcific aortic stenosis. J Chronic Dis 1984;37:407-15.   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Caira FC, Stock SR, Gleason TG, et al. Human degenerative valve disease is associated with up-regulation of low-density lipoprotein re-ceptor-related protein 5 receptor-mediated bone formation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:1707-12.   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Mohty D, Pibarot P, Després JP, et al. Association between plasma LDL particle size, valvular accumulation of oxidized LDL, and inflammation in patients with aortic stenosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2008;28:187-93.