Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.22937/IJCSNS.2022.22.8.12

A Computer-Aided Text Analysis to Explore Recruitment and Intellectual Polarization Strategies in ISIS Media  

Khafaga, Ayman Farid (College of Science and Humanities, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University)
Publication Information
International Journal of Computer Science & Network Security / v.22, no.8, 2022 , pp. 87-96 More about this Journal
Abstract
This paper employs a computer-aided text analysis (CATA) and a Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) to explore the strategies of recruitment and intellectual polarization in ISIS (Islamic State in Iraq and Syria) media. The paper's main objective is to shed light on the efficacy of employing computer software in the linguistic analysis of texts, and the extent to which CATA software contribute to deciphering hidden meanings of texts as well as to arrive at concise and authentic results from these texts. More specifically, this paper attempts to demonstrate the contribution of CATA software represented in the two variables of Frequency Distribution Analysis (FDA) and Content Analysis (CA) in decoding the strategies of recruitment and intellectual polarization in one of ISIS 's digital publication: Rumiyah (a digital magazine published by ISIS). The analytical focus is on three strategies of recruitment and intellectual polarization: (i) lexicalization, (ii) intertextual religionisation, and (iii) justification. Two main findings are revealed in this study. First, the application of CATA software into the linguistic investigation of texts contributes effectively to the understanding of the thematic and ideological messages pertaining to the analyzed text. Second, the computational analysis guarantees concise, credible, authentic and ample results than is the case if the analysis is conducted without the work of computer software. The paper, therefore, recommends the integration of CATA software into the linguistic analysis of the various types of texts.
Keywords
CATA software; recruitment; polarization; ISIS; Rumiyah; ideology;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Wiechmann, D., and Fuhs, S., Concordancing software. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 2(2), pp. 107-127, (2006).
2 Ma, Q., From monitoring users to controlling user actions: A new perspective on the user-centred approach to CALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(4), pp. 297-321, (2007).   DOI
3 Hockey, S., A guide to computer applications in the humanities. London: The Johns Hopkins University Press, (1980).
4 Kennedy, G., An introduction to corpus linguistics. London & New York: Longman, (1998).
5 Chen, Y. H., Computer mediated communication: The use of CMC to develop EFL learners' communicative competence. Asian EFL Journal, 7(1), pp. 167-182, (2005).
6 van Dijk, T. A., Ideology and discourse analysis. Journal of Political Ideologies, 11(2), pp. 115-140, (2006).   DOI
7 Romeo, K., A web-based listening methodology for studying relative clause acquisition. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(1), pp. 51-66, (2008).   DOI
8 Dzekoe, R., Computer-based multimodal composing activities, self-revision, and L2 acquisition through writing. Language Learning & Technology, 21(2), pp.73-95, (2017).
9 Pinner, R. S., Teachers' attitudes to and motivations for using CALL in and around the language classroom. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 34, pp. 188-192, (2012).   DOI
10 van Dijk, T. A., Discourse, knowledge and ideology: Reformulating old questions and proposing some new solutions, in Martin, P., Aertselaer, J. N. and van Dijk, T. A., (Eds.), Communicating ideologies: Multidisciplinary perspectives on language, discourse, and social practice. New York & Oxford: Peter Lang, pp. 5-38, (2004).
11 Thabet, A., Applied computational linguistics: An approach to analysis and evaluation of EFL materials. Damietta Faculty of Education Journal, 1(13), pp. 7-39, (1990).
12 Khafaga, A., Linguistic representation of power in Edward Bond's Lear: A lexico-pragmatic approach to critical discourse analysis. International Journal of English Linguistics, 9(6), 404-420, (2019).   DOI
13 Sornig, K., Some remarks on linguistic strategies of persuasion, in Wodak, R. (Ed.), Language, power and ideology: Studies in political discourse. John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 95-113, (1989).
14 Barger, A., and Byrd, K., Motivation and computer-based instructional design. Journal of Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives in Education, 4(1), pp. 1-9, (2011).
15 Khafaga, A. F., A computational approach to explore the extremist ideologies of Daesh discourse. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 11(8), pp. 193-199, (2020).
16 Reddington, J., Murtagh, F., and Douglas, C., Computational properties of fiction writing and collaborative work. International Symposium on Intelligent Data Analysis, pp. 1-13, (2013).
17 Khafaga, A., and Shaalan, I., Pronouns and modality as ideology carriers in George Orwell's Animal Farm: A computer-aided critical discourse analysis. TESOL International Journal, 16(4.2), pp. 78-102, (2021).
18 Eltahir, M., Al-Qatawneh, S., and Alsalhi, S., E-Textbooks and their application levels, from the perspective of faculty members at Ajman University, U.A.E. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14(13), pp. 88-104, (2019).   DOI
19 Khafaga, A., and Shaalan, I., Using concordance to decode the ideological weight of lexis in learning narrative literature: A computational approach. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 11(4), pp. 246-252, (2020).
20 Beatty, K., Teaching and researching computer-assisted language learning. Harlow: Longman Pearson, (2010).
21 Fowler, R., Language in the news: Discourse and ideology in the press. London: Routledge, (1991).
22 Fowler, R., On critical linguistics, in Coulthard, C., and Coulthard, M., (Eds.), Texts and practices: Readings in critical discourse analysis. London & New York: Routledge, pp. 15-31, (1996).
23 Stockwell, G., Computer-assisted language learning: Diversity in research and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, (2018).
24 van Dijk, T. A., Ideology and discourse analysis. Journal of Political Ideologies, 11(2), pp. 115-140, (2006).   DOI
25 Khafaga, A., Exploring ideologies of function words in George Orwell's Animal Farm. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 29(3), pp. 2089 - 211, (2021).
26 Yavus, F., The use of concordancing programs in ELT. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, pp. 2312-2315, (2014).   DOI
27 Khafaga, A., and Alghawli, A., The impact of CALL software on the performance of EFL students on the Saudi university context. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Application, 12(7), pp. 304-312, (2021).
28 Khafaga, A., and Aldossari, B., The language of persuasion in courtroom discourse: A computer-aided text analysis. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Application, 11(7), pp. 332-340, (2021).
29 Heyden, M. L., Oehmichen, J., Nichting, S., and Volberda, H. W., Board background heterogene-ity and exploration-exploitation: The role of the institutionally adopted board model," Global Strategy Journal, 5(2), pp. 154-176, (2015).   DOI
30 Omar, A., Khafaga, A., and Shaalan, I., The impact of translation software on improving the performance of translation majors. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 11(4), pp. 287-292, (2020).
31 Flowerdew, J., Concordancing as a tool in course design. System, 21(2), pp. 231-244, (1993).   DOI
32 Khafaga, A., Linguistic manipulation of political myth in Margaret Atwood's The Handmaid's Tale. International Journal of English Linguistics, 7(3), 189-200, (2017).   DOI
33 Fairclough, N., Language and power. London and New York: Longman, (1989).
34 Stockwell, G., Computer-assisted language learning: Diversity in research and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, (2018).
35 Beatty, K., Teaching and researching computer-assisted language learning. Harlow: Longman Pearson, (2010).
36 Khafaga, A., Strategies of political persuasion in literary genres: A computational approach to critical discourse analysis. Germany: LAMBERT Publication, (2017).
37 Bond, E., Lear, In plays two. London: Eyre Methuen, (1978).
38 Jarvis, J., and Pastuszka, L., Electronic literacy reading skills and the challenges for English for academic purposes. CALL-EJ Online, 10(1), (2008).
39 Krieger, D., Corpus linguistics: What it is and how it can be applied to teaching. The Internet TESL Journal, IX (3), pp. 123-141, (2003).
40 Pim, C., Emerging technologies, emerging minds: Digital innovations within the primary sector. In: G. Motteram (Ed.), Innovations in learning technologies for English language teaching, London: British Council, pp. 17-42, (2013).
41 Fowler, R., and Kress, G., Critical linguistics, in Fowler, R., Hodge, R., Kress, G., and T. Trew, T., (Eds). Language and control. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp. 185- 213, (1979)
42 Wiechmann, D., and Fuhs, S., Concordancing software. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 2(2), pp. 107-127, (2006).