Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.22937/IJCSNS.2022.22.3.31

Communicative Model of Educational Transformations in the Realities of (Post) Modernity  

Opanasyk, Oksana (Television Journalism and Acting Department Kyiv National University of Culture and Art)
Popova, Yana (Television Journalism and Acting Department Kyiv National University of Culture and Art)
Matiiv, Ihor (Television Journalism and Acting Department Kyiv National University of Culture and Art)
Radenko, Yuliia (Cinema and Television Arts Department Kyiv National University of Culture and Arts)
Mozharovska, Hanna (Television Journalism and Acting Department Kyiv National University of Culture and Art)
Publication Information
International Journal of Computer Science & Network Security / v.22, no.3, 2022 , pp. 245-251 More about this Journal
Abstract
In the context of the pandemic, educational institutions had to ensure an instant transition to remote technological models of communication within the new conditions of the educational environment. The purpose of the academic paper lies in determining the role of the communicative model of educational transformations in the realities of (post) modernity. The research methodology is based on a survey of 120 students from 10 higher educational institutions (HEIs) of Ukraine through an online form regarding the importance of live communication during a pandemic. Results. The communicative model changed significantly during the pandemic - the interaction was mainly due to technologies. The research has identified four communication models of educational transformations under the conditions of the pandemic, depending on learning models. The first traditional model of distance learning involves distance learning; the second model involves contact remote training using remote educational technologies; the third model is blended learning, which combines remote and traditional learning formats, synchronous and asynchronous modes of interaction; the fourth model is traditional contact training. The empirical study of the effectiveness of communication models proves that live communication remains extremely important for learning and understanding of educational materials by students, and technology has provided support for such communication. Along with this, seminars and video lectures with presentations combining live communication and communication technologies are as important as digital learning tools. The most effective teaching method for mastering and memorizing educational material was a live dialogue with a teacher at seminars in ZOOM, followed by individual written assignments on the studied topic.
Keywords
communicative model; educational transformations; education under the conditions of the pandemic; training models; communication;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Simamora, R. M. (2020). The Challenges of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: An essay analysis of performing arts education students. Studies in Learning and Teaching, 1(2), 86-103.   DOI
2 Muthuprasad, T., Aiswarya, S., Aditya, K. S., & Jha, G. K. (2021). Students' perception and preference for online education in India during COVID-19 pandemic. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 3(1), 100101   DOI
3 Nguyen, M. H., Hargittai, E., & Marler, W. (2021). Digital inequality in communication during a time of physical distancing: The case of COVID-19. Computers in Human Behavior, 120, 106717.   DOI
4 Quezada, R. L., Talbot, C., & Quezada-Parker, K. B. (2020). From bricks and mortar to remote teaching: A teacher education program's response to COVID-19. Journal of Education for Teaching, 46(4), 472-483.   DOI
5 United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (2020). Education in a post-COVID world: Nine ideas for public action International Commission on the Futures of Education. Available at: https://en.unesco.org/sites/default/files/education_in_a_post-covid_world-nine_ideas_for_public_action.pdf
6 Wargadinata, W., Maimunah, I., Eva, D., & Rofiq, Z. (2020). Student's responses on learning in the early COVID-19 pandemic. Tadris: Journal of Education and Teacher Training, 5(1), 141-153
7 Yekefallah, L., Namdar, P., Panahi, R., & Dehghankar, L. (2021). Factors related to students' satisfaction with holding e-learning during the Covid-19 pandemic based on the dimensions of e-learning. Heliyon, 7(7), e07628   DOI
8 Taragin-Zeller, L., Rozenblum, Y., & Baram-Tsabari, A. (2020). Public engagement with science among religious minorities: lessons from COVID-19. Science Communication, 42(5), 643-678.   DOI
9 Chatterjee, I., & Chakraborty, P. (2021). Use of information communication technology by medical educators amid covid-19 pandemic and beyond. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(3), 310-324.   DOI
10 Byrnes, K. G., Kiely, P. A., Dunne, C. P., McDermott, K. W., & Coffey, J. C. (2021). Communication, collaboration and contagion:"Virtualisation" of anatomy during COVID-19. Clinical Anatomy, 34(1), 82-89.   DOI
11 Graham, C. R. (2009). Blended learning models. In Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology, Second Edition (pp. 375-382). IGI Global
12 Fatonia, N. A., Nurkhayatic, E., Nurdiawatid, E., Fidziahe, G. P., Adhag, S., Irawanh, A. P., ... & Azizik, E. (2020). University students online learning system during Covid-19 pandemic: Advantages, constraints and solutions. Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy, 11(7), 570-576
13 Fatonia, N. A., Nurkhayatic, E., Nurdiawatid, E., Fidziahe, G. P., Adhag, S., Irawanh, A. P., ... & Azizik, E. (2020). University students online learning system during Covid-19 pandemic: Advantages, constraints and solutions. Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy, 11(7), 570-576
14 Gopal, R., Singh, V., & Aggarwal, A. (2021). Impact of online classes on the satisfaction and performance of students during the pandemic period of COVID 19. Education and Information Technologies, 1-25
15 Franchi, T. (2020). The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on current anatomy education and future careers: A student's perspective. Anatomical Sciences Education, 13(3), 312   DOI
16 Radha, R., Mahalakshmi, K., Kumar, V. S., & Saravanakumar, A. R. (2020). E-Learning during lockdown of Covid-19 pandemic: A global perspective. International journal of control and automation, 13(4), 1088-1099
17 Masalimova, A. R., Ryazanova, E. L., Tararina, L. I., Sokolova, E. G., Ikrennikova, Y. B., Efimushkina, S. V., & Shulga, T. I. (2021). Distance Learning Hybrid Format for University Students in Post-Pandemic Perspective: Collaborative Technologies Aspect. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 16(1), 389-395   DOI
18 Lyons, K. M., Christopoulos, A., & Brock, T. P. (2020). Sustainable pharmacy education in the time of COVID-19. American journal of pharmaceutical education, 84(6).
19 Brammer, S., & Clark, T. (2020). COVID-19 and management education: Reflections on challenges, opportunities, and potential futures. British journal of Management, 31(3), 453.   DOI
20 Dost, S., Hossain, A., Shehab, M., Abdelwahed, A., & Al-Nusair, L. (2020). Perceptions of medical students towards online teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic: a national cross-sectional survey of 2721 UK medical students. BMJ open, 10(11), e042378   DOI
21 Hidayat, D., & Wibawa, D. (2020). Crisis management and communication experience in education during the covid-19 pandemic in indonesia. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 36(3).
22 McCarthy, B., O'Donovan, M., & Trace, A. (2021). A new therapeutic communication model "TAGEET" to help nurses engage therapeutically with patients suspected of or confirmed with COVID-19. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 30(7-8), 1184-1191.   DOI
23 Porter, W. W., Graham, C. R., Spring, K. A., & Welch, K. R. (2014). Blended learning in higher education: Institutional adoption and implementation. Computers & Education, 75, 185-195   DOI