Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.22937/IJCSNS.2021.21.8.13

Strategic Guidelines for The Intensification of Regional Development Under the Impact of Potential-Forming Determinants in the Conditions of Digitalization  

Tulchinskiy, Rostislav (IHE "Academician Yuriy Bugay International Scientific and Technical University")
Chobitok, Viktoriia (Ukrainian Engineering and Pedagogical Academy)
Dergaliuk, Marta (National Technical University of Ukraine "Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute")
Semenchuk, Tetiana (State University of Infrastructure and Technologies (SUIT))
Tarnovska, Iryna (State University of Infrastructure and Technologies (SUIT))
Publication Information
International Journal of Computer Science & Network Security / v.21, no.8, 2021 , pp. 97-104 More about this Journal
Abstract
The key challenges and problematic aspects of the formation of intellectually and innovation-oriented strategies of regional entities at the present stage of their development are considered. The main tasks that arise in the process of strategizing the potential-forming development of regional economic systems in the context of digitalization are identified. The list of key organizational and economic directions of strategic character of providing intellectual and innovative development of regional economic systems is formed, which includes clustering of centers of high-tech development of regions, creation of creative hubs, development of knowledge infrastructure and improvement of interregional cooperation; a brief description of each of the presented strategic organizational and economic directions is given. Based on the analysis, the key strategic guidelines for the development of regional economic entities in the context of digitalization under the influence of potential-forming determinants, which form the content basis for further processes of strategizing qualitative aspects of development of specific regional entities.
Keywords
Region; Regional Policy; Potential-Forming Determinants; Intellectual And Innovative Development; Digitalization;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Arefieva, O., Tulchynska, S., Popelo, O., Arefiev, S., Tkachenko, T. (2021). The Economic Security System in the Conditions of the Powers Transformation. IJCSNS International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 21(7), 35-42. https://doi.org/10.22937/IJCSNS.2021.21.7.4.   DOI
2 Becerra, L., Carenzo, S., Juarez, P. (2020). When circular economy meets inclusive development. Insights from urban recycling and rural water access in Argentina. Sustainability, 12(23), 9809. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12239809.   DOI
3 De Silva, I. (2019). Tackling the challenges raised by the economy digitalization: Recent experiences of the French competition authority. Antitrust Bulletin, 64(1), 3-10. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0003603X18822577.   DOI
4 Gopane, T.J. (2020). Digitalisation, Productivity, and Measurability of Digital Economy: Evidence from BRICS. In 5th International Conference on Digital Economy, ICDEc 2020 "Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing", 395, 27-37. https://ujcontent.uj.ac.za/vital/access/manager/Repository?view=null&f0=sm_identifier%3A%22http%3A%2F%2Fhdl.handle.net%2F10210%2F458882%22&sort=ss_dateNormalized%5C.
5 Alraja, M.N., Hussein, M.A., Ahmed, H.M.S. (2020). What affects digitalization process in developing economies? An evidence from the SMEs sector in Oman. Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, 10(1), 441-448. http://dx.doi.org/10.11591/eei.v10i1.2033.   DOI
6 Efremov, A. (2020). In reference to creating a mechanism for detecting systemic legal limitations of public administration digitalization. Public Administration, 4, 59-83.
7 Bouckaert, G. (2019). Dissemination of scientific knowledge on reforming public administration: Some changing mechanisms. Croatian and Comparative Public Administration, 19(1), 9-22. https://doi.org/10.31297/hkju.19.1.1.   DOI
8 Butko, M., Ivanova, N., Popelo, O., Samiilenko, G. (2020). Conceptual foundations of the regional industrial cluster formation based on European experience and leading world tendencies. Financial and credit activity: Problems of theory and practice, 1(32), 319-329. https://doi.org/10.18371/fcaptp.v1i32.200528.   DOI
9 Adam, M. (2018). Towards a unified approach to digitalization in Europe. Revista de Obras Publicas, 165(3597), 20-27.
10 Afonasova, M.A., Panfilova, E.E., Galichkina, M.A., Slusarczyk, B. (2019). Digitalization in economy and innovation: The effect on social and economic processes. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 19(2), 22-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2019.19.2.02.   DOI
11 Billestrup, J., & Stage, J. (2014). E-government and the digital agenda for Europe: a study of the user involvement in the digitalisation of citizen services in Denmark. In A. Marcus (Ed.), Design, User Experience, and Usability. User Experience Design for Diverse Interaction Platforms and Environments: Third International Conference, DUXU 2014, Held as Part of HCI International 2014, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, June 22-27, 2014, Proceedings, Part II (PART 2 ed., pp. 71-80). Springer Publishing Company. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07626-3_7.   DOI
12 Budzinski, O., Stohr, A. (2019). The competition policy reform in Europe and Germany - institutional change in the light of digitization. European Competition Journal, 15(1), 15-54.   DOI
13 Chudnovskiy, A.D., Tsabolova, O.R., Zhukova, M.A. (2021). Using the Digitalization Experience of Small Enterprises of the Tourism and Hospitality Sector in Germany for Development of the Tourism Infrastructure in Russia. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, 314, 369-376. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56433-9_39.   DOI
14 Shkarlet, S. M., Dubyna, M. V. (2017). Essence and features of information society development. Scientific bulletin of Polissia, 1(2(10)), 152-158.   DOI
15 Lazarenko, I., Saloid, S., Tulchynska, S., Kyrychenko, S., Tulchinskiy, R. (2020). Necessity of implementating data science course in economics curricula. Information technologies and teaching aids, 4(78), 132-144. https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v78i4.3505.   DOI
16 Lin Chia Jie (July, 2018). Denmark leads the world in digital government. https://govinsider.asia/innovation/denmark-online-servicesdigital-government-australia-korea/.
17 Samiilenko, H., Popelo, O., Khudolei, V., Mashnenkov, K., Derkachenko, Yu. (2021). Transformational processes of clustering in digital economy. Laplage em Revista (International), 7(Extra C), 691-702. https://doi.org/10.24115/S2446-622020217ExtraC1106p.691-702
18 Cosmulese, C.G., Grosu, V., Hlaciuc, E., & Zhavoronok, A. (2019). The Influences of the Digital Revolution on the Educational System of the EU Countries. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 3, 242-254. DOI: http://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2019.3-18   DOI
19 Kholiavko, N., Djakona, A., Dubyna, M., Zhavoronok, A., & Lavrov, R. (2020). The higher education adaptability to the digital economy. Bulletin of the National Academy of sciences of the Republic of Kazakhstan, 4(386), 294-306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32014/2020.2518-1467.130   DOI
20 Myovella, G., Karacuka, M., Haucap, J. (2020). Digitalization and economic growth: A comparative analysis of Sub-Saharan Africa and OECD economies. Telecommunications Policy, 44(2), 101856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2019.101856.   DOI
21 Shkarlet, S., Kholiavko, N., Dubyna, M. (2019). Information Economy: Management of Educational, Innovation, and Research Determinants. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 3, 126-141. http://dx.doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2019.3-10.   DOI
22 Sudolska, A., Lapinska, J. (2020). Exploring determinants of innovation capability in manufacturing companies operating in Poland. Sustainability, 12(17), 7101. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12177101.   DOI
23 Popelo, O., Kychko, I., Tulchynska, S., Zhygalkevych, Zh., Treitiak, O. (2021). The Impact of Digitalization on the Forms Change of Employment and the Labor Market in the Context of the Information Economy Development. IJCSNS International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 21(5), 160-167. DOI: 10.22937/IJCSNS.2021.21.5.23   DOI
24 Kljucnikov, A., Civelek, M., Krajcik, V., Ondrejmiskova, I. (2020). Innovative regional development of the structurally disadvantaged industrial region by means of the local currency. Acta Montanistica Slovaca, 25(2), 224-235. http://dx.doi.org/10.46544/AMS.v25i2.9.   DOI
25 Eichstadt, S. (2020). Metrology for the digitalization of economy and society. In 19th ITG/GMA-Symposium on Sensors and Measuring Systems 2018 "Sensoren und Messsysteme - Beitrage der 19. ITG/GMA-Fachtagung" (pp. 340-343).
26 Heath Nick. (February 19, 2019). How Estonia became an e-government powerhouse. https://www.ncsl.org/Portals/1/Documents/educ/International_Ed_Study_Group_2020/Estonia/12.Article_%20HowEstoniabecameane-governmentpowerhouse.pdf.
27 Popelo O., Dubyna M., Kholiavko N. (2021) World Experience In The Introduction Of Modern Innovation And Information Technologies In The Functioning Of Financial Institutions. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 7(2), 188-199. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2021-7-2-188-199.   DOI
28 Klymenko, E.Y., Alpeissova, S.E. (2021). The Experience of Ukraine and Kazakhstan of the Education Digitization Under Quarantine Conditions. Proceeding from Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 1352, 161-172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71782-7_15.   DOI
29 Kornieieva, Yu. V. (2018). The role of the state in promoting investment in digital economy. Economics of forecasting, 1, 120-134. https://doi.org/10.15407/eip2018.01.120.   DOI
30 Sakharova, S., Avdeeva, I., Golovina, T., Parakhina, L. (2021). The public administration of the socio-economic development of the Arctic zone based on a stakeholder approach. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 678, 012035. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/678/1/012035.   DOI
31 Tulchynska, S., Vovk, O., Popelo, O., Saloid, S., Kostiunik, O. (2021). Innovation and investment strategies to intensify the potential modernization and to increase the competitiveness of microeconomic systems. IJCSNS International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 21(6), 161-168. https://doi.org/10.22937/IJCSNS.2021.21.6.22.   DOI
32 Szopik-Depczynska, K., Cheba, K., WiSniewska, J. (2020). Innovation, R&D and user-driven innovation activity in R&D Departments in Poland. The multi-criteria analysis. In International Conference on Knowledge-Based and Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems, KES 2020, 176, 2705-2713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.09.290.   DOI
33 Castellanos, J. M. B. (2019). Social responsibility in public administrations with special reference to the region of Valencia. Revista General de Derecho Administrativo, 52.
34 Xu, Y., Li, A. (2020). The relationship between innovative human capital and interprovincial economic growth based on panel data model and spatial econometrics. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2019.112381.   DOI
35 Zajkowska, M. (2017). Open models of innovation processes as a future management challenge for small and medium-sized enterprises in Poland. Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, 25(4), 193-208. https://doi.org/10.7206/jmba.ce.2450-7814.214.   DOI
36 Samoilovych, A., Garafonova, O., Popelo, O., Marhasova, V., & Lazarenko, Yu. (2021). World experience and ukrainian realities of digital transformation of regions in the context of the information economy development. Financial and credit activity: problems of theory and practice, (3(38)), 316-325. https://doi.org/10.18371/fcaptp.v3i38.237462.   DOI
37 Tulchynska, S., Popelo, O., Dergaliuk, B., Khanin, S., Shevchuk, N. (2021). Strategic assessment of the ecological condition of the regions in the context of innovative development. Laplage em Revista (International), 7(Extra D), 315-322. https://doi.org/10.24115/S2446-622020217Extra-D1101p.315-322.   DOI
38 Halkos, G., Moll de A. J., Todorov, V. (2021). Economies' inclusive and green industrial performance: An evidence based proposed index. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279, 123516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123516.   DOI
39 Khanin, S., Arefieva, O., Dergaliuk, M., Popelo, O., Tulchynska, S. (2021). Concepts of the activation of intellectual and innovative determinants for the development intensification of regional economic systems introduction. Laplage em Revista (International), 7(Extra E), 234-244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24115/S2446-622020217Extra-E1180p.234-244.   DOI
40 De Leon C. A. G. (2019). The role of public administration in promoting socio-economic development. Social Development and Societies in Transition (pp. 107-120). ImprintRoutledge.
41 Dannikov, O. V., Sichkarenko, K. O. (2018). Conceptual principles of the economy digitalization in Ukraine. Economics and management of the national economy, 17, 73-79.
42 Loginova, E., Loseva, N., Polkovnikov, A. (2020). Realization of population's motivational potential in the system of public administration as a factor of institutional ensuring the competitiveness of the Region. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 110, 276-284. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45913-0_32.   DOI
43 Mukhametzhan, S., Junusbekova, G., Daueshov, M. (2020). The management of Urban development for the regional economic growth: The example of Kazakhstan. Economy of Region, 16(4), 1285-1301. https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2020-4-19.   DOI
44 Kraynyuk, L., Uhodnikova, O., Vlashchenk, N., Sokolenko, A., Viatkin, K. (2020). The mechanism of public administration of the travel industry development: Prospects for the ecotourism development. XIII International Scientific and Practical Conference "State and Prospects for the Development of Agribusiness - INTERAGROMASH 2020", 175, 10016. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202017510016.   DOI
45 Ljungholm, D. P. (2017). Global policy mechanisms intergovernmental power politics and democratic decision-making modes of transnational public administration. Geopolitics History and International Relations, 9(2), 199-205. doi:10.22381/GHIR92201710.   DOI
46 Popelo, O. V. (2017). Methodological approaches to modernization processes of the productive forces in the conditions of Eurointegration. Scientific Bulletin of Polissia, 1(1(9)), 218-224. http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4581-5129.   DOI
47 Shkarlet, S., Ivanova, N., Popelo, O., Dubina, M., Zhuk, O. (2020). Infrastructural and Regional Development: Theoretical Aspects and Practical Issues. Studies of Applied Economics, 38(4). https://doi.org/10.25115/eea.v38i4.4002.   DOI
48 Revko, A., Butko, M., Popelo, O. (2020). Methodology for Assessing the Inflence of Cultural Infrastructure on Regional Development in Poland and Ukraine. Comparatie Economic Research. Central and Eastern Europe, 23(2), 21-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.18778/1508-2008.23.10.   DOI
49 Reznichenko, S., Shishkin, V., Shichiyakh, R., Smolentsev, V. (2016). Theoretical and methodological foundations of the management by objectives for the regional socioeconomic systems development. International Review of Management and Marketing, 6(6), 90-94. http://www.econjournals.com/index.php/irmm/article/view/2929/pdf.
50 Salbaroli, E., Mazzini, G. (2018). OCP Deployment in a Public Administration Data Center: The Emilia-Romagna Region Use Case. IEEE International Black Sea Conference on Communications and Networking (BlackSeaCom). DOI: 10.1109/BlackSeaCom.2018.8433637.   DOI
51 Skica, T., Dvoulety, O. (2018). Quantification of the size of local public administration: Empirical study of Polish regions. European Spatial Research and Policy, 25(1), 75-92. https://doi.org/10.18778/1231-1952.25.1.05.   DOI
52 Yin, X. (2018). Construction of management system for coordination degree of regional economic development based on the fusion of spatial econometric model. 10th International Conference on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation (ICMTMA) (art 17703620). DOI: 10.1109/ICMTMA.2018.00124.   DOI
53 Khanin, S., Tulchynska, S., Popelo, O., Derhaliuk, M., Ishchejkin, T. (2021). Systematization of functional features of intellectual and innovative determinants of the intensification of the regional economic development. Laplage em Revista (International), 7(2), 710-720. https://doi.org/10.24115/S2446-62202021721118p.710-720.   DOI
54 Wu, D. (2018). Computer model deduction based on function mechanism of government micro-blog's participation in public administration. Journal of Advanced Oxidation Technologies, 21(2), 201811577.
55 Xu. Y., Li, A. (2019). Regional economic development coordination management system based on fuzzy hierarchical statistical model. Neural Computing and Applications, 31(12), 8305-8315. DOI: 10.1007/s00521-018-3953-8.   DOI
56 Yukhneva, N., Mokerova, O., Kukhtin, P. (2016). The regulatory role of the state strategic management in the development of the regional entrepreneurial sphere. MATEC Web of Conferences, 106, 08089. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201710608089.   DOI
57 Soboleva, Yu., Matveev, V., Ilyukhina, I., Efimenko, I., Simonov, S. (2019). Progressive advance in supply chain management of regional socio-economic development: Conceptual framework and evaluation mechanism. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 8(4), 751-760. https://ojs.excelingtech.co.uk/index.php/IJSCM/article/view/3414/1828.
58 Khudolei, V., Bespalov, M., Tulchynska, S., Tulchinsky, R., Kholivko, N. (2021). Fiscal stimulation of spatial development: the eu contriems' cases. Financial and credit activities: problems of theory and practice, (1(36)), 124-132. https://doi.org/10.18371/fcaptp.v1i36.227676.   DOI