Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/eas.2022.23.3.271

Seismic behavior and design method of socket self-centering bridge pier with hybrid energy dissipation system  

Guo, Mengqiang (School of Civil Engineering, Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology)
Men, Jinjie (School of Civil Engineering, Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology)
Fan, Dongxin (School of Civil Engineering, Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology)
Shen, Yanli (School of Civil Engineering, Hebei University of Engineering)
Publication Information
Earthquakes and Structures / v.23, no.3, 2022 , pp. 271-282 More about this Journal
Abstract
Seismic resisting self-centering bridge piers with high energy dissipation and negligible residual displacement after an earthquake event are focus topics of current structural engineering. The energy dissipation components of typical bridge piers are often relatively single; and exhibit a certain level of damage under earthquakes, leading to large residual displacements and low cumulative energy dissipation. In this paper, a novel socket self-centering bridge pier with a hybrid energy dissipation system is proposed. The seismic resilience of bridge piers can be improved through the rational design of annular grooves and rubber cushions. The seismic response was evaluated through the finite element method. The effects of rubber cushion thickness, annular groove depth, axial compression ratio, and lateral strength contribution ratio of rubber cushion on the seismic behavior of bridge piers are systematically studied. The results show that the annular groove depth has the greatest influence on the seismic performance of the bridge pier. Especially, the lateral strength contribution ratio of the rubber cushion mainly depends on the depth of the annular groove. The axial compression ratio has a significant effect on the ultimate bearing capacity. Finally, the seismic design method is proposed according to the influence of the above research parameters on the seismic performance of bridge piers, and the method is validated by an example. It is suggested that the range of lateral strength contribution ratio of rubber cushion is 0.028 ~ 0.053.
Keywords
design method; finite element; hybrid energy dissipation system; seismic performance; self-centering pier;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Akiyama, M., Matsuzaki, H., Dang, H.T. and Suzuki, M. (2012), "Reliability-based capacity design for reinforced concrete brige structures", Struct. Infrasturct. Eng., 8(12), 1096-1107. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2010.507707.   DOI
2 Xia, X.S., Wu, S.W., Wei, X.H., Jiao, C.Y. and Chen, X.C. (2021b), "Experimental and numerical study on seismic behavior of a self-centering railway bridge pier", Earthq. Struct., 21(2), 173-183. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2021.21.2.173.   DOI
3 Cao, Z.L., Guo, T., Xu, Z.K. and Lu, S. (2015a), "Theoretical analysis of self-centering concrete piers with external dissipators", Earthq. Struct., 9(6), 1313-1336. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2015.9.6.1313.   DOI
4 Rodgers, G.W., Mander, J.B., Chase, J.G. and Dhakal, R.P. (2016), "Beyond ductility: parametric testing of a jointed rocking beamcolumn connection designed for damage avoidance", J. Struct. Eng., 142(8), C4015006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001318.   DOI
5 Guo, T., Cao, Z.L., Xu, Z.K. and Lu, S. (2015), "Cyclic load tests on self-centering concrete pier with external dissipators and enhanced durability", J. Struct. Eng., 142(1), 04015088. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001357.   DOI
6 Mohebbi, A., Saiidi, M.S. and Itani, A.M. (2018), "Shake table studies and analysis of a PT-UHPC bridge column with pocket connection", J. Struct. Eng., 144(4), 04018021. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001997.   DOI
7 Yoshida, N. (2014), "Comparison of seismic ground response analyses under large earthquakes", Indian Geotech. J., 44(2), 119-131. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40098-014-0104-8.   DOI
8 Bruneau, M. and Reinhorn, A. (2007), "Exploring the concept of seismic resilience for acute care facilities", Earthq. Spectra, 23(1), 41-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1193/1.2431396.   DOI
9 Fang, C., Dong, L., Zheng, Y., Michael, C.H.Y. and Sun, R.Q. (2020), "Rocking bridge piers equipped with shape memory alloy (SMA) washer springs", Eng. Struct., 214(1), 110651. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110651.   DOI
10 Ichikawa, S., Matsuzaki, H., Moustafa, A., ElGawady, M.A. and Kawashima, K. (2016), "Seismic-resistant bridge columns with ultrahigh-performance concrete segments", J. Struct. Eng., 21(9), 04016049. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000898.   DOI
11 Xia, X.S., Zhang, X.Y., Shi, J. and Tang, J.Y. (2021a), "Seismic isolation of railway bridges using a self-centering pier", Smart Struct. Syst., 27(3), 447-455. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/sss.2021.27.3.447.   DOI
12 Piras, S., Palermo, A. and Saiid Saiidi, M. (2022), "State-of-the-art of post-tensioned rocking bridge substructure systems", J. Bridge Eng., 27(3), 03122001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001833.   DOI
13 Han Q, Jia, Z.L., Xu, K., Zhou, Y.L. and Du, X.L. (2019), "Hysteretic behavior investigation of self-centering doublecolumn rocking piers for seismic resilience", Eng. Struct., 188, 218-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.03.024.   DOI
14 Cao, Z.L., Wang, H. and Guo, T. (2016b), "Fragility analysis of self-centering prestressed concrete bridge pier with externalaluminum dissipators", Adv. Struct. Eng., 20(8), 1210-1222. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1369433216673376.   DOI
15 Mitoulis, S.A. and Rodriguez, J.R. (2017), "Seismic performance of novel resilient hinges for columns and application on irregular bridges", J. Bridge Eng., 22(2), 04016114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000980.   DOI
16 Zhang, L., Li, Z.H. and Ma, X.Q. (2018), "Study on parameter characteristics of rubber Mooney-Rivlin model", Noise Vib. Control, 38(S2), 427-430. https://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-1355.2018.Z1.091.   DOI
17 Sideris, P., Aref, A.J. and Filiatrault, A. (2014), "Quasistatic cyclic testing of a large-scale hybrid sliding rocking segmental column with slip-dominant joints", J. Bridge Eng., 19(10), 04014036. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000605.   DOI
18 Wang, Z., Wang, J.Q., Tang, Y.C., Liu, T.X., Gao, Y.F. and Zhang, J. (2018), "Seismic behavior of precast segmental UHPC bridge columns with replaceable external cover plates and internal dissipaters", Eng. Struct., 177, 540-555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.10.012.   DOI
19 Guerrini, G., Restrepo, J.I., Massari, M. and Vervelidis, A. (2014), "Seismic behavior of post-tensioned self-centering precast concrete dual-shell steel columns", J. Struct. Eng., 141(4), 04014115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001054.   DOI
20 Guo, J., Xin, K.G., He, M.H. and Hu, L. (2012), "Experimental study and analysis on the seismic performance of a selfcentering bridge pier", Eng. Mech., 29(S1), 29-34+45. https://dx.doi.org/10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2011.11.S036.   DOI
21 Palermo, A. and Pampanin, S. (2008), "Enhanced seismic performance of hybrid bridge systems: Comparison with traditional monolithic solutions", J. Earthq. Eng., 12(8), 1267-1295. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460802003819.   DOI
22 Ou, Y.C., Tsai, M.S., Chang, K.C. and Lee, G.C. (2010), "Cyclicbehavior of precast segmental concrete bridge columns withhigh performance or conventional steel reinforcing bars as energy dissipation bars", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 39(11), 1181-1198. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.986.   DOI