Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/eas.2022.23.2.139

Optimized design of dual steel moment resisting system equipped with cross-anchored self-centering buckling restrained chevron brace  

Khaneghah, Mohammadreza Ahadpour (School of Civil Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology)
Dehcheshmaeh, Esmaeil Mohammadi (School of Civil Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology)
Broujerdian, Vahid (School of Civil Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology)
Amiri, Gholamreza Ghodrati (Natural Disasters Prevention Research Center, Iran University of science and Technology)
Publication Information
Earthquakes and Structures / v.23, no.2, 2022 , pp. 139-150 More about this Journal
Abstract
In most self-center braces, decreasing residual deformation is possible only by increasing pretension force, which results in lower energy dissipation capacity. On the other hand, increasing energy dissipation capacity means higher values of residual deformation. The goal of this research was to find the best design for a self-centering buckling restrained brace (SC-BRB) system by balancing self-centering capability and energy dissipation. Three, six, and nine-story structures were investigated using OpenSees software and the TCL programming language to achieve this goal. For each height, 62 different SC-BRBs were considered using different values for the pretension force of cables, the area of the buckling restrained brace (BRB) core plate, and the yield stress of the core plate. The residual deformation and dissipated energy of all the models were calculated using nonlinear analyses after cyclic loading was applied. The optimum design for each height was determined among all the models and was compared to the structure equipped with the usual BRB. The residual deformation of the framed buildings was significantly reduced, according to the findings. Also the reduction of the energy dissipation was acceptable. The optimum design of SC-BRB in 6-story building has the most reduction percent in residual deformation, it can reduce residual deformation of building 83% while causing only a 57% of reduction in dissipated energy. The greatest reduction in residual deformation versus dissipated energy reduction was for the optimum SC-BRB design of 9-story building, results indicated that it can reduce residual deformation of building 69% while causing only a 42% of reduction in dissipated energy.
Keywords
buckling restrained brace; dual steel moment resisting system; energy absorption self-centering; optimum design; residual deformation;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 7  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Zhou, Y., Shao, H., Cao, Y. and Lui, E.M. (2021), "Application of buckling-restrained braces to earthquake-resistant design of buildings: A review", Eng. Struct., 246, 112991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112991.   DOI
2 Kamaludin, P.N.C., Kassem, M.M., Farsangi, E.N., Nazri, F.M. and Yamaguchi, E. (2020), "Seismic resilience evaluation of RC-MRFs equipped with passive damping devices", Earthq. Struct., 18(3), 391-405. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2020.18.3.391.   DOI
3 Karayannis, C.G., Izzuddin, B.A. and Elnashai, A.S. (1994), "Application of adaptive analysis to reinforced concrete frames.", J. Struct. Eng., 120(10), 2935-2957. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1994)120:10(2935).   DOI
4 Kiggins, S. and Uang, C.M. (2006), "Reducing residual drift of buckling-restrained braced frames as a dual system", Eng. Struct., 28(11), 1525-1532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.10.023.   DOI
5 Kim, J. and Choi, H. (2004), "Behavior and design of structures with buckling-restrained braces", Eng. Struct., 26(6), 693-706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2003.09.010.   DOI
6 Kurama, Y., Pessiki, S., Sause, R. and Lu, L.W. (1999), "Seismic behavior and design of unbonded post-tensioned precast concrete walls", PCI J., 44(3), 72-89. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.05011999.72.89.   DOI
7 Patel, C.C., Jangid, R.S. (2011), "Dynamic response of adjacent structures connected by friction damper", Earthq. Struct., 2(2), 149-169. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2011.2.2.149.   DOI
8 Sabelli, R., Mahin, S. and Chang, C. (2003), "Seismic demands on steel braced frame buildings with buckling-restrained braces", Eng. Struct., 25(5), 655-666. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(02)00175-X.   DOI
9 Xie, Q. (2005), "State of the art of buckling-restrained braces in Asia", J. Construct. Steel Res., 61(6), 727-748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2004.11.005.   DOI
10 Kurama, Y., Sause, R., Pessiki, S. and Lu, L.W. (1999), "Lateral Load Behavior and Seismic Design of Unbonded Post- Tensioned Precast Concrete Walls", ACI Structural J., 96(4), 622-632. https://doi.org/10.14359/700.   DOI
11 Miller, D.J., Fahnestock, L.A. and Eatherton, M.R. (2012), "Development and experimental validation of a nickel-titanium shape memory alloy self-centering buckling-restrained brace", Eng. Struct., 40, 288-298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.02.037.   DOI
12 Patel, C.C., Jangid, R.S. (2013), "Dynamic response of identical adjacent structures connected by viscous damper", Struct. Controland Health Monitoring, 21(2), 205-224. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.1566.   DOI
13 Izzuddin, B.A. (1991), "Nonlinear dynamic analysis of framed structures.", Ph.D. Dissertation, Imperial College of Science and Technology, London.
14 Hoveidae, N. (2019), "Multi-material core as self-centering mechanism for buildings incorporating BRBs", Earthq. Struct., 16(5), 589-599. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2019.16.5.589.   DOI
15 Eatherton, M.R., Fahnestock, L.A. and Miller, D.J. (2014), "Computational study of self-centering buckling-restrained braced frame seismic performance.", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dynam., 43(13), 1897-1914. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2428.   DOI
16 Khorami, M., Alvansazyazdi, M., Shariati, M., Zandi, Y., Jalali, A. and Tahir, M.M. (2017a), "Seismic performance evaluation of buckling restrained braced frames (BRBF) using incremental nonlinear dynamic analysis method (IDA)", Earthq. Struct., 13(6), 531-538. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2017.13.6.531.   DOI
17 Deng, K., Pan, P., Lam, A., Pan, Z. and Ye, L. (2013), "Test and simulation of full-scale self-centering beam-to-column connection", Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib., 12(4), 599-607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-013-0200-2.   DOI
18 Deng, K., Pan, P., Li, W. and Xue, Y. (2015), "Development of a buckling restrained shear panel damper", J. Construct. Steel Res., 106, 311-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.01.004.   DOI
19 Dongbin, Z., Xin, N., Peng, P., Mengzi, W., Kailai, D. and Yabin, C. (2016), "Experimental study and finite element analysis of a buckling-restrained brace consisting of three steel tubes with slotted holes in the middle tube", J. Construct. Steel Res., 124, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2016.05.003.   DOI
20 Dougka, G., Dimakogianni, D. and Vayas, I. (2014), "Seismic behavior of frames with innovative energy dissipation systems (FUSEIS 1-1)", Earthq. Struct., 6(5), 561-580. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2014.6.5.561.   DOI
21 El-Sheikh, M.T., Sause, R., Pessiki, S. and Lu, L. (1999), "Seismic behavior and design of unbonded post-tensioned precast concrete frames", PCI J., 44(3), 54-71.   DOI
22 Erochko, J., Christopoulos, C., Tremblay, R. and Choi, H. (2011), "Residual drift response of SMRFS and BRB frames in steel buildings designed according to ASCE 7-05", J. Struct. Eng., 137(5), 589-599. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0000296.   DOI
23 Izzuddin, B.A., Karayannis, C.G. and Elnashai, A.S. (1994), "Advanced nonlinear formulation for reinforced concrete beamcolumns", J. Struct. Eng., 120(10), 2913-2934. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1994)120:10(2913).   DOI
24 Dereje, J.A., Eldin, M.N. and Kim, J. (2021), "Seismic retrofit of a soft first story structure using an optimally designed posttensioned PC frame", Earthq. Struct., 20(6), 627-637. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2021.20.6.000.   DOI
25 Eatherton, M. R., Ma, X., Krawinkler, H., Mar, D., Billington, S., Hajjar, J. F. and Deierlein, G.G. (2014), "Design concepts for controlled rocking of self-centering steel-braced frames", J. Struct. Eng., 140(11), 04014082. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0001047.   DOI
26 Filippou, F.C., Popov, E.P. and Bertero, V.V. (1983), "Effects of bond deterioration on hysteretic behavior of reinforced concrete joints", UCB/EERC-83/19; University of California.
27 Erochko, J., Christopoulos, C. and Tremblay, R. (2015), "Design, testing, and detailed component modeling of a high-capacity self-centering energy-dissipative brace", J. Struct. Eng., 141(8), 04014193. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0001166.   DOI
28 Herning, G., Garlock, M.M., Ricles, J., Sause, R. and Li, J. (2009), "An overview of self-centering steel moment frames", Proceedings of the 2009 Structures Congress, Austin, Texas, United States, April. https://doi.org/10.1061/41031(341)154.   DOI
29 Chou, C.C. and Chung, P.T. (2014), "Development of crossanchored dual-core self-centering braces for seismic resistance", J. Construct. Steel Res., 101, 19-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2014.04.035   DOI
30 Christopoulos, C., Tremblay, R., Kim, H. and Lacerte, M. (2008), "Self-centering energy dissipative bracing system for the seismic resistance of structures: Development and validation", J. Struct. Eng., 134(1), 96-107. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:1(96).   DOI
31 ASCE/SEI 7-10 (2016), Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, American Society of Civil Engineers; Washington, USA.
32 Ahadpour Khaneghah, M.R., Mohammadi Dehcheshmeh, E. and Broujerdian, V. (2021), "Optimized design and investigation of cyclic behavior of dual intermediate steel moment resisting system equipped with self-centering buckling restrained 2-story-X-brace", Sharif J. Civil Eng., 37(2.1), https://doi.org/51-60. 10.24200/J30.2020.55635.2758.   DOI
33 AISC360 (2016), Specification for Structural Steel Buildings, American National Standard; Chicago, Illinois, USA.
34 ANSI/AISC 341-10 (2005), Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings (Including Supplement No. 1), American Institute of Steel Construction; Chicago, USA.
35 Wang, H., Nie, X. and Pan, P. (2017), "Development of a selfcentering buckling restrained brace using cross-anchored prestressed steel strands", J. Construct. Steel Res., 138, 621-632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.07.017.   DOI
36 Beiraghi, H. and Alinaghi, A. (2021), "Performance based assessment for tall core structures consisting of buckling restrained braced frames and RC walls", Earthq. Struct., 21(5), 515-530. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2021.21.5.515.   DOI
37 Black, C.J., Makris, N. and Aiken, I.D. (2004), "Component testing, seismic evaluation and characterization of bucklingrestrained braces", J. Struct. Eng., 130(6), 880-894. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:6(880).   DOI
38 Chancellor, N.B., Eatherton, M.R., Roke, D.A. and Akbas, T. (2014), "Self-centering seismic lateral force resisting systems: High performance structures for the city of tomorrow", Buildings, 4(3), 520-548. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings4030520.   DOI
39 Priestley, M.J.N. (1991), "Overview of PRESSS research program", PCI J., 36(4), 50-57.   DOI
40 Uang, C.M., Nakashima, M. and Tsai, K.C. (2004), "Research and application of buckling-restrained braced frames", Int. J. Steel Struct., 4(4), 301-313.
41 Zhou, Z., Xie, Q., Lei, X.C., He, X.T. and Meng, S.P. (2015), "Experimental investigation of the hysteretic performance of dual-tube self-centering buckling-restrained braces with composite tendons", J. Compos. Construct., 19(6), 04015011. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000565   DOI
42 Zhu, S. and Zhang, Y. (2008), "Seismic analysis of concentrically braced frame systems with self-centering friction damping braces", J. Struct. Eng., 134(1), 121-131. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:1(121).   DOI