Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/eas.2018.14.5.477

A stochastic adaptive pushover procedure for seismic assessment of buildings  

Jafari, Mohammad (Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University)
Soltani, Masoud (Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University)
Publication Information
Earthquakes and Structures / v.14, no.5, 2018 , pp. 477-492 More about this Journal
Abstract
Recently, the adaptive nonlinear static analysis method has been widely used in the field of performance based earthquake engineering. However, the proposed methods are almost deterministic and cannot directly consider the seismic record uncertainties. In the current study an innovative Stochastic Adaptive Pushover Analysis, called "SAPA", based on equivalent hysteresis system responses is developed to consider the earthquake record to record uncertainties. The methodology offers a direct stochastic analysis which estimates the seismic demands of the structure in a probabilistic manner. In this procedure by using a stochastic linearization technique in each step, the equivalent hysteresis system is analyzed and the probabilistic characteristics of the result are obtained by which the lateral force pattern is extracted and the actual structure is pushed. To compare the results, three different types of analysis have been considered; conventional pushover methods, incremental dynamic analysis, IDA, and the SAPA method. The result shows an admirable accuracy in predicting the structure responses.
Keywords
Bouc-Wen model; stochastic adaptive pushover; stochastic linearization; extreme value;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 6  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Davenport, A.G. (1964), "Note on the distribution of the largest value of a random function with application to gust loading", Proc., Inst. Civil Eng., 28, 187-196.
2 Elghadamsi, F.E., Mohraz, B., Lee, C.T. and Moayyad, P. (1988), "Time-dependent power spectral density of earthquake ground motion", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 7(1), 15-21.   DOI
3 Elnashai, A.S. (2001), "Advanced inelastic static (pushover) analysis for earthquake applications", Struct. Eng. Mech., 12(1), 51-70.   DOI
4 Foliente, G.C. (1993), "Stochastic dynamic response of wood structural systems", Ph.D. Dissertation, Virginia Tech, Virginia.
5 Gupta, B. and Kunnath, S.K. (2000), "Adaptive spectra-based pushover procedure for seismic evaluation of structures", Earthq. Spectra, 16(2), 367-392.   DOI
6 Hurtado, J.E. and Barbat, A.H. (2000), "Equivalent linearization of the Bouc-Wen hysteretic model", Eng. Struct., 22(9), 1121-1132.   DOI
7 Kalkan, E. and Kunnath, S.K. (2006), "Adaptive modal combination procedure for nonlinear static analysis of building structures", J. Struct. Eng., 132(11), 1721-1731.   DOI
8 Kanai, K. (1957), "Semi-empirical formula for the seismic characteristics of the ground motion", Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst. Univ. Tokyo, 35, 209-325.
9 Landi, L., Pollioa, B. and Diotallevi, P.P. (2014), "Effectiveness of different standard and advanced pushover procedures for regular and irregular RC frames", Struct. Eng. Mech., 51(3), 433-446.   DOI
10 Lutes, L.D. and Sarkani, S. (2004), Random Vibrations: Analysis of Structural and Mechanical Systems, Butterworth-Heinemann.
11 Maekawa, K. (2006), "General information for COM3", Version 9.11 in MULTI-COM, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Tokyo.
12 Pre-standard, F.E.M.A. (2000), Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, Report FEMA-356, SAC Joint Venture for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC.
13 Michaelov, G., Lutes, L.D. and Sarkani, S. (2001), "Extreme value of response to nonstationary excitation", J. Eng. Mech., 127(4), 352-363.   DOI
14 Pour, H.G., Ansari, M. and Bayat, M. (2014), "A new lateral load pattern for pushover analysis in structures", Earthq. Struct., 6(4), 437-455.   DOI
15 Poursha, M., Khoshnoudian, F. and Moghadam, A.S. (2009), "A consecutive modal pushover procedure for estimating the seismic demands of tall buildings", Eng. Struct., 31(2), 591-599.   DOI
16 Reinhorn, A.M. (1997), "Inelastic analysis techniques", Proceedings of the US-Italian Workshop on Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit, USA, New York City, December.
17 Roberts, J.B. and Spanos, P.D. (2003), Random Vibration and Statistical Linearization, Courier Corporation.
18 Sarkar, P., Prasad, A.M. and Menon, D. (2016), "Seismic evaluation of RC stepped building frames using improved pushover analysis", Earthq. Struct., 10(4), 913-938.   DOI
19 Shayanfar, M.A., Ashoory, M., Bakhshpoori, T. and Farhadi, B. (2013), "Optimization of modal load pattern for pushover analysis of building structures", Struct. Eng. Mech., 47(1), 119-129.   DOI
20 Anagnostopoulos, S.A., Kyrkos, M.T. and Stathopoulos, K.G. (2015), "Earthquake induced torsion in buildings: critical review and state of the art", Earthq. Struct., 8(2), 305-377.   DOI
21 Antoniou, S. and Pinho, R. (2004), "Development and verification of a displacement-based adaptive pushover procedure", J. Earthq. Eng., 8(5), 643-661.   DOI
22 Wen, Y.K. (1976), "Method for random vibration of hysteretic systems", J. Eng. Mech. Div., 102(2), 249-263.
23 Tajimi, H. (1960), "Statistical method of determining the maximum response of building structure during an earthquake", Proceedings of the 2nd WCEE, 2, 781-798.
24 Tarbali, K. and Shakeri, K. (2014), "Story shear and torsional moment-based pushover procedure for asymmetric-plan buildings using an adaptive capacity spectrum method", Eng. Struct., 79, 32-44.   DOI
25 Maekawa, K., Okamura, H. and Pimanmas, A. (2003), Non-linear Mechanics of Reinforced Concrete, CRC Press.
26 Tataie, L., Brun, M. and Reynouard, J.M. (2012), "Modal pushover procedures for seismic evaluation of reinforced concrete structures: using new nonlinear single degree of freedom systems", Eur. J. Environ. Civil Eng., 16(2), 178-203.   DOI
27 Vamvatsikos, D. and Cornell, C.A. (2002), "Incremental dynamic analysis", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 31(3), 491-514.   DOI
28 ATC, A. (1996), 40, Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings, Applied Technology Council, Report ATC-40, Redwood City.
29 Araujo, M., Marques, M. and Delgado, R. (2014), "Multidirectional pushover analysis for seismic assessment of irregular-in-plan bridges", Eng. Struct., 79, 375-389.   DOI
30 ASCE/SEI 41-13 (2013), Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings, Structural Engineering Institute, Reston, VA.
31 Baros, D.K. and Anagnostopoulos, S.A. (2017), "A new approach for 3-D pushover based analysis of asymmetric buildings: development and initial evaluation", Earthq. Struct., 12(5), 543-557.   DOI
32 Baros, D.K. and Dritsos, S.E. (2008), "A simplified procedure to select a suitable retrofit strategy for existing RC buildings using pushover analysis", J. Earthq. Eng., 12(6), 823-848.   DOI
33 Beheshti-Aval, S.B. and Keshani, S. (2014), "A Phenomenological study on inelastic torsion caused by nonlinear behavior changes during earthquake excitations", Civil Eng. Infrastr. J., 47(2), 273-290.
34 Bouc, R. (1967), "Forced vibration of mechanical systems with hysteresis", Proceedings of the Fourth Conference on Nonlinear Oscillation, Prague, Czechoslovakia, September.
35 Bracci, J.M., Kunnath, S.K. and Reinhorn, A.M. (1997), "Seismic performance and retrofit evaluation of reinforced concrete structures", J. Struct. Eng., 123(1), 3-10.   DOI
36 Charalampakis, A.E. and Koumousis, V.K. (2008), "On the response and dissipated energy of Bouc-Wen hysteretic model", J. Sound Vib., 309(3), 887-895.   DOI
37 Chopra, A.K. and Goel, R.K. (2002), "A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 31(3), 561-582.   DOI