1 |
Imashi, N. and Massumi, A. (2011), "A comparative study of the seismic provisions of Iranian seismic code (standard no. 2800) and International building code 2003", Asian J. Civ. Eng., 12(5), 579-596.
|
2 |
International Building Code (2012), International Code Council Inc., Falls Church, VA, USA.
|
3 |
IS: 13920 (1993), "Ductile detailing of reinforced concrete structures subjected to seismic forces -code of practice", Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India.
|
4 |
IS: 1893 (part 1) (2002), "Indian standard criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures", Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India.
|
5 |
IS: 456 (2000), "Indian standard code of practice for plain and reinforced concrete", Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India.
|
6 |
Khose , V.N., Singh, Y, and Lang, D.H. (2012), "A comparative study of design base shear for RC buildings in selected seismic design codes", Earthq. Spectra, 28(3), 1047-1070.
DOI
|
7 |
Malekpour, S., Seyyedi, P., Dashti, F. and Asghari, J.F. (2011), "Seismic performance evaluation of steel moment-resisting frames using Iranian, European and Japanese seismic codes", Procedia Eng., 14, 3331-3337.
DOI
|
8 |
Nahhas, T.M. (2011), "A comparison of IBC with 1997 UBC for modal response spectrum analysis in standard-occupancy buildings", Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib., 10(1), 99-113.
DOI
|
9 |
Pong, W., Gannon, G.A. and Lee, Z.H. (2007), "A comparative study of seismic provisions between the International building code 2003 and Mexico's manual of civil works 1993", J. Adv. Struct. Eng., 10(2), 153-170.
DOI
|
10 |
Pong, W., Lee, Z.H. and Lee, A. (2006), "A comparative study of seismic provisions between International building code 2003 and uniform building code 1997", Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib., 5(1), 49-60.
DOI
|
11 |
Santos, S.H.C., Zanaica, L., Bucur, C., Lima S.S. and Arai, A. (2013), "Comparative study of codes for seismic design of structures", Math. Model. Civ. Eng., 9(1), 1-12.
DOI
|
12 |
Singh, Y., Khose, V.N. and Lang, D.H. (2012), "A comparative study of code provisions for ductile RC frame buildings", Proceedings of the 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal.
|
13 |
Yayong, W. (2004), "Comparison of seismic actions and structural design requirements in Chinese Code GB 50011 and International Standard ISO 3010", Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib., 3(1), 1-9.
DOI
|
14 |
FEMA-273 (1997), "NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings", Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC.
|
15 |
ASCE 41-06 (2007), "Seismic rehabilitation of existing buildings", American Society of Civil Engineers, Virginia, USA.
|
16 |
Dogangun, A. (2006), "A comparative study of the design spectra defined by Eurocode 8, UBC, IBC and Turkish Earthquake Code on R/C sample buildings", J. Seismol., 10(3), 335-351.
DOI
|
17 |
EC8 (2004), "Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance Part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings", European Norm, European Committee for Standardisation, Brussels.
|
18 |
FEMA-356 (2000), "Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings", Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC.
|
19 |
Ghosh, S.K. and Khuntia, M. (1999), "Impact of seismic design provisions of 2000 IBC: Comparison with 1997UBC", Proceedings of the 68th Annual Convention, Structural Engineers Association of California (SEAOC), Santa Barbra, California, USA.
|
20 |
Iervolino, I., Maddaloni, G. and Cosenza, E. (2008), "Eurocode 8 compliant real record sets for seismic analysis of structures", J. Earthq. Eng., 12(1), 54-90.
DOI
|