Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/gae.2017.12.5.831

Geotechnical shear behavior of Xanthan Gum biopolymer treated sand from direct shear testing  

Lee, Sojeong (Geotechnical Engineering Research Institute (GERI), Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology (KICT))
Chang, Ilhan (School of Engineering and Information Technology, University of New South Wales (UNSW))
Chung, Moon-Kyung (Geotechnical Engineering Research Institute (GERI), Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology (KICT))
Kim, Yunyoung (Inha University)
Kee, Jong (Hanyang University)
Publication Information
Geomechanics and Engineering / v.12, no.5, 2017 , pp. 831-847 More about this Journal
Abstract
Conventional geotechnical engineering soil binders such as ordinary cement or lime have environmental issues in terms of sustainable development. Thus, environmentally friendly materials have attracted considerable interest in modern geotechnical engineering. Microbial biopolymers are being actively developed in order to improve geotechnical engineering properties such as aggregate stability, strength, and hydraulic conductivity of various soil types. This study evaluates the geotechnical engineering shear behavior of sand treated with xanthan gum biopolymer through laboratory direct shear testing. Xanthan gum-sand mixtures with various xanthan gum content (percent to the mass of sand) and gel phases (initial, dried, and re-submerged) were considered. Xanthan gum content of 1.0% sufficiently improves the inter-particle cohesion of cohesionless sands 3.8 times and more (up to 14 times for dried state) than in the untreated (natural) condition, regardless of the xanthan gum gel condition. In general, the strength of xanthan gum-treated sand shows dependency with the rheology and phase of xanthan gum gels in inter-granular pores, which decreases in order as dried (biofilm state), initial (uniform hydrogel), and re-submerged (swollen hydrogel after drying) states. As xanthan gum hydrogels are pseudo-plastic, both inter-particle friction angle and cohesion of xanthan gum-treated sand decrease with water adsorbed swelling at large strain levels. However, for 2% xanthan gum-treated sands, the re-submerged state shows a higher strength than the initial state due to the gradual and non-uniform swelling behavior of highly concentrated biofilms.
Keywords
Xanthan gum; biopolymer; direct shear; inter-particle; friction angle; cohesion;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Ahn, T.B. (2010), "Effects of DCM column properties in softground on stabilities of underground roadway", KSCE J. Civil Eng., 30(2C), 77-84.
2 ASTM D3080 / D3080M-11 (2011), Standard test method for direct shear test of soils under consolidated drained conditions; ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA.
3 Ayeldeen, M.K., Negm, A.M. and El Sawwaf, M.A. (2016), "Evaluating the physical characteristics of biopolymer/soil mixtures", Arab. J. Geosci., 9(5), 1-13.   DOI
4 Bell, F.G. (1996), "Lime stabilization of clay minerals and soils", Eng. Geol., 42(4), 223-237.   DOI
5 Bergado, D.T. (1996), Soft Ground Improvement: In Lowland and Other Environments, ASCE Press, New York, NY, USA.
6 Boardman, D., Glendinning, S. and Rogers, C. (2001), "Development of stabilisation and solidification in lime-clay mixes", Geotechnique, 51(6), 533-543.   DOI
7 Broms, B. and Boman, P, (1975), "Lime stabilized columns", Proceedings of the 5th Asian Regional Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Bangalore, India, December, pp. 227-234.
8 Casas, J.A., Santos, V.E. and Garcia-Ochoa, F. (2000), "Xanthan gum production under several operational conditions: molecular structure and rheological properties*", Enzyme Microb. Tech., 26(2-4), 282-291.   DOI
9 Chang, I. and Cho, G.-C. (2012), "Strengthening of Korean residual soil with ${\beta}$-1,3/1,6-glucan biopolymer", Constr. Build. Mater., 30, 30-35.   DOI
10 Chang, I. and Cho, G.-C. (2014), "Geotechnical behavior of a ${\beta}$-1,3/1,6-glucan biopolymer-treated residual soil", Geomech. Eng., Int. J., 7(6), 633-647.   DOI
11 Chang, I., Im, J. and Cho, G.-C. (2016a), "Geotechnical engineering behaviors of gellan gum biopolymer treated sand", Can. Geotech. J., 53(10), 1658-1670.   DOI
12 Chang, I., Im, J. and Cho, G.-C. (2016b), "Introduction of microbial biopolymers in soil treatment for future environmentally-friendly and sustainable geotechnical engineering", Sustainability, 8(3), 251.   DOI
13 Chang, I., Im, J., Prasidhi, A.K. and Cho, G.-C. (2015a), "Effects of Xanthan gum biopolymer on soil strengthening", Constr. Build. Mater., 74, 65-72.   DOI
14 Chang, I., Jeon, M. and Cho, G.-C. (2015b), "Application of microbial biopolymers as an alternative construction binder for earth buildings in underdeveloped countries", Int. J. Polym. Sci., 9.
15 Chang, I., Prasidhi, A.K., Im, J. and Cho, G.-C. (2015c), "Soil strengthening using thermo-gelation biopolymers", Constr. Build. Mater., 77, 430-438.   DOI
16 Comba, S. and Sethi, R. (2009), "Stabilization of highly concentrated suspensions of iron nanoparticles using shear-thinning gels of xanthan gum", Water Res., 43(15), 3717-3726.   DOI
17 Chang, I., Prasidhi, A.K., Im, J., Shin, H.-D. and Cho, G.-C. (2015d), "Soil treatment using microbial biopolymers for anti-desertification purposes", Geoderma, 253-254, 39-47.   DOI
18 Choate, W.T. (2003), "Energy and emission reduction opportunities for the cement industry", Energy Emission Reduction Opportunities for the Cement Industry, BCS, Incorporated.
19 Cole, D., Ringelberg, D. and Reynolds, C. (2012), "Small-Scale Mechanical Properties of Biopolymers", J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 138(9), 1063-1074.   DOI
20 Das, B.M. and Sobhan, K. (2014), Principles of Geotechnical Engineering, Cengage Learning, Australia.
21 Druss, D.L. (2005), Challenge of Employing Deep Mixing Methods ill the US; Deep Mixing.
22 Garcia, M.C., Alfaro, M.C., Calero, N. and Munoz, J. (2011), "Influence of gellan gum concentration on the dynamic viscoelasticity and transient flow of fluid gels", Biochem. Eng. J., 55(2), 73-81.   DOI
23 Ham, S., Kwon, T., Chang, I. and Chung, M. (2016), "Ultrasonic P-Wave Reflection Monitoring of Soil Erosion for Erosion Function Apparatus", Geotech. Test. J., 39(2), 301-314.
24 Havlica, J. and Sahu, S. (1992), "Mechanism of ettringite and monosulphate formation", Cement Concrete Res., 22(4), 671-677.   DOI
25 Horpibulsk, S., Rachan, R., Suddeepong, A. and Chinkulkijniwat, A. (2011), "Strength development in cement admixed Bangkok clay: Laboratory and field investigations", Soils Found., 51(2), 239-251.   DOI
26 Mitchell, J.K. and Soga, K.B. (2005), Fundamentals of Soil Behavior, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, USA.
27 Lin, K.Q. and Wong, I.H. (1999), "Use of deep cement mixing to reduce settlements at bridge approaches", J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 125(4), 309-320.   DOI
28 Larsson, S., Rothhamel, M. and Jacks, G. (2009), "A laboratory study on strength loss in kaolin surrounding lime-cement columns", Appl. Clay Sci., 44(1-2), 116-126.   DOI
29 Malekpoor, M. and Poorebrahim, G. (2014), "Comparative study on the behavior of lime-soil columns and other types of stone columns", Geomech. Eng., Int. J., 7(2), 133-148.   DOI
30 Nugent, R.A., Zhang, G.P. and Gambrell, R.P. (2009), "Effect of exopolymers on the liquid limit of clays and its engineering implications", Transport. Res. Record, 2101, 34-43.   DOI
31 Plank, J. (2005), "Applications of biopolymers in construction engineering", Biopolymers Online, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA.
32 Sherwood, P.T. (1993), Soil Stabilization with Cement and Lime, HMSO, London, UK.
33 Shooshpasha, I. and Shirvani, R.A. (2015), "Effect of cement stabilization on geotechnical properties of sandy soils", Geomech. Eng., Int. J., 8(1), 17-31.   DOI
34 U.S. Energy Information Administration (2015), International Energy Statistics; (U.S. Department of Energy, Ed.), Washington, DC, USA.