Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/gae.2015.8.4.615

Uplift response of multi-plate helical anchors in cohesive soil  

Demir, Ahmet (Department of Civil Engineering, Osmaniye Korkut Ata University)
Ok, Bahadir (Department of Civil Engineering, Adana Science and Technology University)
Publication Information
Geomechanics and Engineering / v.8, no.4, 2015 , pp. 615-630 More about this Journal
Abstract
The use of helical anchors has been extensively beyond their traditional use in the electrical power industry in recent years. They are commonly used in more traditional civil engineering infrastructure applications so that the advantages of rapid installation and immediate loading capability. The majority of the research has been directed toward the tensile uplift behaviour of single anchors (only one plate) by far. However, anchors commonly have more than one plate. Moreover, no thorough numerical and experimental analyses have been performed to determine the ultimate pullout loads of multi-plate anchors. The understanding of behavior of these anchors is unsatisfactory and the existing design methods have shown to be largely inappropriate and inadequate for a framework adopted by engineers. So, a better understanding of helical anchor behavior will lead to increased confidence in design, a wider acceptance as a foundation alternative, and more economic and safer designs. The main aim of this research is to use numerical modeling techniques to better understand multi-plate helical anchor foundation behavior in soft clay soils. Experimental and numerical investigations into the uplift capacity of helical anchor in soft clay have been conducted in this study. A total of 6 laboratory tests were carried out using helical anchor plate with a diameter of 0.05 m. The results of physical and computational studies investigating the uplift response of helical anchors in soft clay show that maximum resistances depend on anchor embedment ratio and anchor spacing ratio S/D. Agreement between uplift capacities from laboratory tests and finite element modelling using PLAXIS is excellent for anchors up to embedment ratios of 6.
Keywords
uplift capacity; helical anchors; soft clay; breakout factor; finite element analysis;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 ASTM D 2435-96 (1998), Standard test method for one-dimensional consolidation properties of soils; Annual Book of ASTM standards (Volume 04.08), Soil and Rock (I), Standard, PA, USA, pp.207-216.
2 Brinkgreve, R.B.J. and Vermeer, P.A. (1998), Finite Element Code for Soil and Rock Analyses, A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
3 Das, B.M. (1978), "Model tests for uplift capacity of foundations in clay", Soil. Found., 18(2), 17-24.   DOI
4 Das, B.M. (1980), "A procedure for estimation of ultimate uplift capacity of foundations in clay", Soil. Found., 20(1), 77-82.   DOI
5 Demir, A., Laman, M., Yildiz, A. and Ornek, M. (2013), "Large scale field tests on geogrid-reinforced granular fill underlain by clay soil", 38, 1-15.   DOI
6 Dickin, E.A. and Nazir, R. (1999), "Moment carrying capacity of short pile foundations in cohesionless soil", J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., ASCE, 125(1), 1-10.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Ghaly, A., Hanna, A. and Hanna, M. (1991), "Uplift behavior of screw anchors in sand", J. Geotech. Eng. Div. ASCE, 117(5), 773-793.   DOI
8 Hoyt, R.M. and Clemence, S.P. (1991), "Uplift capacity of helical anchors in soil", Proceedings 12th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering [Comptes Rendus du Congres International de Mecanique des Sols et des Travaux de Fondations], Volume 2, A.A. Balkema Publishers, Rotterdam, Netherlands, pp. 1019-1022.
9 Kaya, N. and Ornek, M. (2013), "Experimental and numerical studies of t-shaped footings", Acta Geotechnica Slovenica, 1, 43-58.
10 Laman, M. and Yildiz, A. (2007), "Numerical studies of ring foundations on geogrid-reinforced sand", Geosynth. Int., 14(2), 1-13.   DOI
11 Lutenegger, A.J., Smith, B.L. and Kabir, M.G. (1988), "Use of in situ tests to predict uplift performance of multi helix anchors", (GSP 16), Special topics in foundations ASCE, New York, NY, USA, pp. 93-110.
12 Merifield, R.S. (2011), "Ultimate uplift capacity of multiplate helical type anchors in clay", J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 137(7), 704-716.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Merifield, R.S., Lyamin, A.V., Sloan, S.W. and Yu, H.S. (2003), "Three-dimensional lower bound solutions for stability of plate anchors in clay", J. Geotech. Geoenviron Eng., ASCE, 129(3), 243-253.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Meyerhof, G.G. (1973). "Uplift resistance of inclined anchors and piles", Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering [Comptes Rendus du Congres International de Mecanique des Sols et des Travaux de Fondations], Vol. 2:1, A.A. Balkema Publishers, Rotterdam, Netherlands, pp. 167-172.
15 Meyerhof, G.G. and Adams, J.I. (1968), "The ultimate uplift capacity of foundations", Can. Geotech. J., 5(4), 225-244.   DOI
16 Narasimha Rao, S., Prasad, Y.V.S.N. and Veeresh, C. (1993), "Behavior of embedded model screw anchors in soft clays" Geotechnique, 43(4), 605-614.   DOI
17 Mitsch, M.P. and Clemence, S.P. (1985), "Uplift capacity of helix anchors in sand", In: Uplift Behavior Anchor Foundations in Soil, ASCE, pp. 26-47.
18 Mooney, J.S., Adamczak, S.J. and Clemence, S.P. (1985), "Uplift capacity of helix anchors in clay and silt", In: Uplift Behavior of Anchor Foundations in Soil, ASCE, pp. 48-72.
19 Narasimha Rao, S., Prasad, Y.V.S.N. and Shetty, M.D. (1991), "The behavior of model screw piles in cohesive soils", Soil. Found., 31(2), 35-50.   DOI
20 Singh, S.P. and Ramaswamy, S.V. (2008), "Contribution of suction force to undrained breakout capacity of plate anchors", International Association for Computer Methods and Advances in Geomechanics, Goa, India, October, pp. 3166-3173.
21 Vesic, A.S. (1971), "Breakout resistance of objects embedded in ocean bottom", J. Soil Mech. Found. Div., ASCE, 97(9), 1183-1205.
22 Weikart, A.M. and Clemence, S.P. (1987), "Helix anchor foundations two case histories", (GSP 8), Foundations for Transmission Line Towers ASCE, New York, pp. 72-80.