Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/gae.2014.7.3.233

A new geomechanical approach to investigate the role of in-situ stresses and pore pressure on hydraulic fracture pressure profile in vertical and horizontal oil wells  

Saberhosseini, Seyed Erfan (Department of Petroleum Engineering, Science and research branch, Islamic Azad University)
Keshavarzi, Reza (Young Researchers and Elites Club, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University)
Ahangari, Kaveh (Department of Mining Engineering, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University)
Publication Information
Geomechanics and Engineering / v.7, no.3, 2014 , pp. 233-246 More about this Journal
Abstract
Estimation of fracture initiation pressure is one of the most difficult technical challenges in hydraulic fracturing treatment of vertical or horizontal oil wells. In this study, the influence of in-situ stresses and pore pressure values on fracture initiation pressure and its profile in vertical and horizontal oil wells in a normal stress regime have been investigated. Cohesive elements with traction-separation law (XFEM-based cohesive law) are used for simulating the fracturing process in a fluid-solid coupling finite element model. The maximum nominal stress criterion is selected for initiation of damage in the cohesive elements. The stress intensity factors are verified for both XFEM-based cohesive law and analytical solution to show the validation of the cohesive law in fracture modeling where the compared results are in a very good agreement with less than 1% error. The results showed that, generally by increasing the difference between the maximum and minimum horizontal stress, the fracture pressure and its profile has been strongly changed in the vertical wells. Also, it's been clearly observed that in a horizontal well drilled in the direction of minimum horizontal stress, the values of fracture pressure have been significantly affected by the difference between overburden pressure and maximum horizontal stress. Additionally, increasing pore pressure from under-pressure regime to over-pressure state has made a considerable fall on fracture pressure in both vertical and horizontal oil wells.
Keywords
hydraulic fracturing; in-situ stress; pore pressure; fracture pressure profile; cohesive elements; finite element; XFEM-based cohesive law;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Camanho, P.P. and Davila, C.G. (2002), "Mixed-mode decohesion finite elements for the simulation of delamination in composite materials", NASA/TM-2002-211737, pp. 1-42.
2 Chen, Z. (2011), "Finite element modeling of viscosity-dominated hydraulic fractures", Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 88-89, 136-144.
3 Batchelor, G.K. (1967), An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, London, UK, p.615.
4 ABAQUS (2011), ABAQUS Documentation, Version 6. 11-1.
5 Barenblatt, G.I. (1962), "The mathematical theory of equilibrium of cracks in brittle fracture", Advances in Applied Mechanics, 7, 55-129.   DOI
6 Bowie, O.L. (1964), "Rectangular tensile sheet with symmetric edge cracks", Journal of Applied Mechanics, 31(2), 208-212.   DOI
7 Chen, Z.R., Bunger, A.P., Zhang, X. and Jeffrey, R.G. (2009), "Cohesive zone finite element based modeling of hydraulic fractures", Acta Mech. Solida Sin., 22(5), 443-452.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Dugdale, D.S. (1960), "Yielding of steel sheets containing slits", Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 8(2), 100-104.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Fjaer, E. (2008), Petroleum Related Rock Mechanic, Elsevier Publication Books, p. 491.
10 Huang, R., Sukumar, N. and Prevost, J.H. (2003), "Modeling quasi-static crack growth with the extended finite element method Part II: Numerical applications", Int. J. Solids Struct., 40, 7539-7552.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Sarris, E. and Papanastasiou, P. (2011), "The influence of the cohesive process zone in hydraulic fracture modeling", International Journal of Fracture, 167(1), 33-45.   DOI
12 Settari, A. and Cleary, M.P. (1984), "Three-dimensional simulation of hydraulic fracturing", J. Pet. Technol., 36(8), 1177-1190.   DOI
13 Tada, H., Paris, P.C. and Irwin, G.R. (1973), The Stress Analysis of Cracks Handbook, Del Research Corp., Hellertown, PA, USA.
14 Tomar, V., Zhai, J. and Zhou, M. (2004), "Bounds for element size in a variable stiffness cohesive finite element model", Int. J. Numer. Method. Eng., 61(11), 1894-1920.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Peirce, A. and Detournay, E. (2008), "An implicit level set method for modeling hydraulically driven fractures", Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 197(33-40), 2858-2885.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Valco, P. and Economides, M.J. (1997), Hydraulic Fracture Mechanics, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Texas A&M University, TX, USA.
17 Zhang, G.M., Liu, H., Zhang, J., Wu, H.A. and Wang, X.X. (2010), "Three-dimensional finite element simulation and parametric study for horizontal well hydraulic fracture", Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 72(3-4), 310-317.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Zhu, H.Y., Deng, J.G., Liu, S.J., Wen, M., Peng, C.Y., Li, J.R., Chen, Z.J., Hu, L.B., Lin, H. and Guang, D. (2014), "Hydraulic fracturing experiments of highly deviated well with oriented perforation technique", Geomechanics and Engineering, Int. J., 6(2), 153-172.   DOI   ScienceOn