Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/gae.2012.4.4.251

Taming of large diameter triaxial setup  

Nair, Asha M. (Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Science)
Madhavi Latha, G. (Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Science)
Publication Information
Geomechanics and Engineering / v.4, no.4, 2012 , pp. 251-262 More about this Journal
Abstract
Triaxial tests are essential to estimate the shear strength properties of the soil or rock. Normally triaxial tests are carried out on samples of 38 mm diameter and 76 mm height. Granular materials, predominantly used in base/sub-base construction of pavements or in railways have size range of 60-75 mm. Determination of shear strength parameters of those materials can be made possible only through triaxial tests on large diameter samples. This paper describes a large diameter cyclic triaxial testing facility set up in the Geotechnical Engineering lab of Indian Institute of Science. This setup consists of 100 kN capacity dynamic loading frame, which facilitates testing of samples of up to 300 mm diameter and 600 mm height. The loading ram can be actuated up to a maximum frequency of 10 Hz, with maximum amplitude of 100 mm. The setup is capable of carrying out static as well as dynamic triaxial tests under isotropic, anisotropic conditions with a maximum confining pressure of 1 MPa. Working with this setup is a difficult task because of the size of the sample. In this paper, a detailed discussion on the various problems encountered during the initial testing using the equipment, the ideas and solutions adopted to solve them are presented. Pilot experiments on granular sub-base material of 53 mm down size are also presented.
Keywords
triaxial test; laboratory study; cyclic test; large scale testing; installation;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Anderson, W.F. and Fair, P. (2008), "Behaviour of railroad ballast under monotonic and cyclic loading", J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. - ASCE, 134(3), 316-327.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Araei, A.A., Soroush, A. and Rayhani, M. (2010), "Large-scale triaxial testing and numerical modeling of rounded and angular rockfill materials", Scientia Iranica, Transaction A: Civil Engineering, 17(3), 169-183.
3 Aursudkij, B. (2007), "Behaviour under traffic loading and tamping maintenance", PhD Thesis submitted at University of Nottingham.
4 Bathurst, R.J. and Karpurapu, R. (1993), "Large-scale triaxial compression testing of geocell reinforced granular soils", Geotechnical Testing Journal ASTM, 16(3), 296-303.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Charles, J.A. and Watts, K.S. (1980), "The influence of confining pressure on the shear strength of compacted rockfill", Geotechnique, 30(4), 353-367.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Indraratna, B., Wijewardena, L.S.S. and Balasubramaniam, A.S. (1993), "Large-scale triaxial testing of greywacke rockfill", Geotechnique, 43(1), 37-51.   DOI
7 Indraratna, B., Thakur, P.K. and Vinod, J.S. (2010), "Experimental and numerical study of railway ballast behavior under cyclic loading", Int. J. Geomech., 10(4), 136-144.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Indraratna, B., Wijewardena, L.S.S. and Balasubramaniam, A.S. (1993), "Large Scale triaxial testing of greywacke rockfill", Geotechnique, 43(1), 37-51.   DOI
9 Indian Roads Congress (IRC) (2004), Specification for Rural Roads, Ministry of Rural Development, New Delhi, India.
10 Marachi, N.D., Chan, C.K. and Seed, H.B. (1972), "Evaluation of properties of rockfill materials", J. Soil Mech. Fnds Div, Proc. ASCE (SM1), 98, 95-114.
11 Marsal, R.J. (1967), "Large scale testing of rockfill materials", J. Soil Mech. Fdns Div, Proc. ASCE (SM2), 93, 27-44.
12 Raymond, G.P. and Williams, D.R. (1978), "Repeated load triaxial test on a dolomite ballast", J. Geotech. Eng. Div., Proc. ASCE, 104(7), GT7, 1013-1029.
13 Sevi, A.F., Louis, G. and Take, W.A. (2009), "A large-scale triaxial apparatus for prototype railroad ballast testing", Geotech. Test. J. ASTM, 32(4), 1-8.
14 Suiker, A.S.J., Selig, E.T. and Frenkel, R. (2005), "Static and cyclic triaxial testing of ballast and sub-ballast", J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. - ASCE, 131(6), 771-782.   DOI   ScienceOn