Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.12652/Ksce.2017.37.6.1087

An Analysis on Determinants of the Amount of Orders Received in Construction Technology Engineering Industry Sector  

Lee, Jae Song (Pusan National University)
Kim, Hyun Soo (Pusan National University)
Jang, Keun Young (Urban Group Unit)
Choi, Yeol (Pusan National University)
Publication Information
KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research / v.37, no.6, 2017 , pp. 1087-1093 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to present an empirical analysis of determinants of the amount of orders received in construction technology engineering industry sector. Regression model was applied for 5 years from 2010 to 2014 to find out how the factors affecting the amount of orders received each year are different and what trends are observed. Although common significant variables were identified that there is a difference in the impact on their orders received. Specifically, the increase in the number of orders received while reducing the impact on orders received from 2010 to 2013, 2014 showed a slight tendency to increase. And increase in the number of employees shows that the influence of order received is higher in 2014 than in 2010. In addition, the gap between the metropolitan area and the non-metropolitan area has doubled in 2014 compared to 2010, but it is also confirmed that the metropolitan area is still strong. On the other hand, in the case of licensed technology, the only statistically significant variable was the negative correlation between the amount of orders received. Although the influence declined in 2014 compared to 2011, it still had a large impact on the amount of orders received.
Keywords
Construction technology sector; Engineering industry; Amount of orders received; Regression model;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Jung, W. J., Yu, I. H., Kim, K. R. and Shin, D. W. (2005). "Analysis of the Weights of Performance Measurement Index According to the Size of Construction Companies." Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Structure & Construction, Vol. 21, No. 8, pp. 121-128 (in Korean).
2 Kagioglou, M., Cooper, R. and Aouad, G. (2001). "Performance management in construction: a conceptual framework." Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 85-95.   DOI
3 Kaplan, R. S. and Norton, D. P. (1993). "Putting the balanced scorecard to work", Harvard Business Review, Vol. 71, No. 5, pp. 134-147.
4 Korea Engineering & Consulting Association (KENCA) (2010-2014). Announced Data of Orders Received (in Korean).
5 Love, P. E. D. and Holt, G. D. (2000). "Construction business performance measurement: the SPM alternative." Business Process Management, Vol. 6, No. 5, pp. 408-416.   DOI
6 Mbugua, L. M., Harris, P., Holt, G. D. and Olomolaiye, P. O. (1999). "A Framework for Determining Critical Success Factors Influencing Construction Business Performance." 15th Annual Conference and General Meeting, Association of Researchers in Construction Management, John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.
7 Park, S. S. (1997). A long-term forecasting for the engineering industry in Korea, Master's Thsis, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (in Korean).
8 Sung, C. H. (2003). A study on the innovation system of korean engineering industry: application of innovation system, Master's Thsis, Seoul National University (in Korean).
9 Tnag, Y. H. and Ogulana, S. O. (2003). "Modelling the dynamic performance of a construction organization." Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 127-136.   DOI