Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.12652/Ksce.2011.31.3A.199

A Study for the Evaluation of Ship Collision Forces for the Design of Bridge Pier I : Mean Collision Force  

Lee, Gye Hee (목포해양대학교 해양시스템공학부)
Hong, Kwan Young (오션스페이스(주))
Publication Information
KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research / v.31, no.3A, 2011 , pp. 199-206 More about this Journal
Abstract
In Korea, the current design codes for the bridge vessel collision load are based on AASHTO LRFD code which derived from the mean collision forces of the Woisin's test. To estimate the conservativeness of the code, in this study, the mean forces of head on collisions were evaluated from the mass-acceleration relationship of vessel and the deformation-kinetic energy relationship of bow those obtained from the series of nonlinear finite element analysis, and the mean forces were compared to that in AASHTO design code. As results, the variations of the mean forces versus the sizes of vessels were represented similar tendency, even those of the code are very conservative. However, the variations of mean collision force versus those of collision speeds were dominated by the plastic deformation of bow and it was differ from those of the code that have linear relationship with the collision speeds.
Keywords
AASHTO LRFD; collision speed; Mean collision force; mass-acceleration; bow indentation; nonlinear collision analysis;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 건설교통부(2005) 도로교설계기준.
2 대한토목학회(2006) 케이블강교량설계지침.
3 이계희, 고재용, 이성로(2004) 방호공을 고려한 선박의 충돌하중, 한국전산구조공학회 학술발표회 논문집, 한국전산구조공학회, 제17권 제32호, pp. 193-200.
4 이계희, 홍관영, 고재용(2005) 중형 충돌시 선박과 방호공의 충돌거동, 대학토목학회논문집, 대한토목학회, 제25권 제6A호, pp. 1133-1141.
5 이성로, 배용귀, 이계희(2006) 구조물의 선박충돌해석, 한국구조물진단학회논문집, 한국구조물진단학회, 제10권 제4호, pp. 87-96.
6 이성로, 배용귀(2007) 소형선박충돌에 의한 독립수직파일 방호구조물의 구조특성분석, 대한토목학회논문집, 대한토목학회, 제27권 제2A호, pp. 201-207.
7 Larsen, O.D. (1993) Ship collision with bridges: the interaction between vessel traffic and bridge structures, IABSE Structural Engineering Document 4, IASBE-AIPC-IVBH, Zurich, Switzerland.
8 AASHTO. (1991) Guide specification and commentary for vessel collision design of highway bridge, american association of state highway and transportation officials, Washington, D.C.
9 AASHTO. (2004) AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specification and Commentary.
10 Amdahl, J. (1983) Energy absorption in ship-platform impacts. Dr. Thess, The Norwegian Inst. of Techn., Trondheim
11 Kuroiwa, T., Kawamoto, Y., Kasuba, S., and Stillman, D., Numerical Simulation of Collision and Grounding of Ships, Proc. of Int. Conference on Technologies for Marine Environment Preservation (MARIENV'95), Vol. 1, Tokyo, pp. 66-70, Sept. 1995.
12 LS-DYNA (2003) LS-DYNA Keyword User's Manual: Version 970, Livermore Software Technology Corporation, Livermore, CA.
13 Nagasawa, H., Arita, K., Tani, M., and Oka, S. (1977) A Study on the Collapse of Ship Structure in Collision with Bridge Piers, J. of the Society of Naval Architects of Japan, Vol. 142, pp. 323-332.
14 Saul, R. and Svensson, H. (1983) Means of Reducing Consequences of Ship Collisions with Bridges and Offshore Structures, IABSE Colloquium on Ship Collision with Bridges and Offshore Structures, Copenhagen.
15 Woisin, G. (1977) "Die Kollisionsversuche der GKSS." Jahrbuch der Schiffbautechnischen Gesellschaft, Vol. 70, pp. 465-487, Berlin.
16 Yang, P.D.C. and Caldwell, J.B. (1988) Collision energy absorption of ship's bow structures, International J. of Impact Engineering, N2, pp. 181-196.