Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5804/LHIJ.2021.12.4.61

Regional Quality of Life Satisfaction and Life SOC Service Gap Analysis: A Case of Chungcheongnam-do  

Hong, Sung-Hyo (공주대학교)
Im, Jun-Hong (충남연구원)
Lee, Gyounju (한국교통대학교)
Publication Information
Land and Housing Review / v.12, no.4, 2021 , pp. 61-79 More about this Journal
Abstract
Despite the rapid economic growth, people's quality of life has not been improved and the regional and hierarchical disparities of it have deepened. We analysed regional differences in quality of life and it was found that non-capital regions, provinces and rural areas compared to Seoul and capital region, metropolitan cities, and urban areas respectively, show a relatively lower level of satisfaction in the quality of life. An in-depth analysis of Chungcheongnam-do province shows that the trend was similar to that of the national analysis. The quality of life satisfaction of the elderly was lower than that of the young and middle-aged, and this trend was similar regardless of region. Young people living in the Dong area showed high satisfaction with the quality of life than the middle-aged and elderly living in the Myeon area. It was observed the level of Life SOC services in urban areas have been better than the one in rural areas. However, there is no clear relationship between quality of life satisfaction and the expansion of Life SOC, therefore, it is difficult to argue that the government intervention to expand Life SOC will improve the citizen's quality of life satisfaction. The implication of the study is that the future supply policy of the Life SOC should be based on the detailed analysis of the impact on the environment, and linking with the development of various programs in progress rather than supplying a Life SOC that provides a single service. Furthermore, in rural areas it is essential to enhance user demand by combining several services in supply and to improve the efficiency of managing the services.
Keywords
Quality of Life; Life SOC; Regional Gap; Chungcheongnam-do;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 허만형(2014), "지방정부의 삶의 질 영향요인 탐색에 관한 연구: 광역지방자치단체를 대상으로", 「지방정부연구」, 18(3): 231-254.
2 Shucksmith, M., S. Cameron, T. Meridew and F. Pichler (2009), "Urban-Rural Differences in Quality of Life across the European Union", Regional Studies, 43(10): 1275-1289.   DOI
3 이승철(2011), "도시유형별 삶의 질 수준과 영향요인: 대구.경북지역을 중심으로", 「지방정부연구」, 15(2): 97-119.
4 통계청(2020), "통계청GIS 집계구 원자료".
5 통계청(2020), "한국사회조사 원자료".
6 Campanera, J. and P., Higgins (2011), "Quality of Life in Urban-Classified and Rural-Classified English Local Authority Areas", Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 43(3): 683-702.   DOI
7 Ismail, R., M. H. Hafezi and R. M. Nor (2014), "The Comparison between Socio-Demographic Characteristic on Quality of Life and Marital Hapines in Sub-Urban and Rural Area in Malaysia", Research Journal of Aplied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 7(7): 1418-1425.   DOI
8 공공데이터(국토지표)(2019), 생활SOC 위치 원자료.
9 고광용.고명철(2017), "미국 지방정부의 공공서비스 만족도와 지역사회 삶의 질 간 상관성 분석: Peterson의 정책유형론을 중심으로", 「사회과학연구」, 29(2): 27-55.
10 국토교통부(2019), 「2018년 주거실태조사」, 세종.
11 국토교통부(2020), 「2019년 주거실태조사」.
12 김현철(2020), "글로벌 경제 대변혁과 한국", 충남연구원 특강자료(2020.2.3.).
13 문경주(2014), "지방정부의 동태적 효율성과 지역사회의 삶의 질 및 지방정치구조 변화와의 상관성 분석: 16개 광역지방정부를 중심으로", 「지방정부연구」, 18(1): 1-31.
14 박대식.마상진(2007), "도시와 농촌 주민의 삶의 질 지수화 방안 연구", 「농촌경제」, 30(4): 31-55.
15 충청남도(2020), "2019년 충남사회지표조사 원자료".
16 배민기.조택희(2016), "삶의 질 특성에 따른 지자체 유형화 및 정책방향: 충청북도를 사례로", 「지방정부연구」, 20(3): 133-154.
17 양진향.권영숙(2005), "도시와 농촌 지역 성인여성의 생활양식, 건강실태 및 삶의 질 비교", 「기본간호학회지」, 12(1): 6-14.