Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5804/LHIJ.2012.3.2.159

Improvement on Development Permit System after the Abolition of the Regulation against Continuous and Adjacent Development  

Kim, Young-Woo (국토해양부)
Yoon, Jeong-Joong (토지주택연구원)
Publication Information
Land and Housing Review / v.3, no.2, 2012 , pp. 159-167 More about this Journal
Abstract
The regulation of continuous and adjacent development was introduced to prevent unplanned and improper development and to protect environment in green zone and non-urban area that was deficient in infrastructure. Though it has been effective, it was repealed in 2011 by disorderly development problem caused by crafty tricks around restrictions. Alternatively, the Urban Planning Commission is now deliberating on the development permit, but there are still much to be resolved such as improper committee formation and abuse of power, insufficient green corridor preservation, a lack of use of planning information system, discordance between landscape management guidelines in laws, etc. Therefore, we suggest several ideas for improvement of development permit system as follows; intensive deliberation system in the Urban Planning Commission, integrated commission for green corridor prevention, early establishment of urban planning information system, making a development permission guideline to minimize discretional act of the Urban Planning Commission, etc.
Keywords
Development Permit System; Regulation against Continuous and Adjacent Development;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 강남대학교 도시연구회(2003), 새로운 국토도시계획제도의 이해, 보성각.
2 건설교통부, 서울시, 인천시, 경기도(2008), 2020년 수도권 광역도시계획.
3 국토해양부(2010), 도시․건축업무편람.
4 김태경, 김제국, 권대한(2007), "개발행위허가제도 운용실태 및 개선방향에 관한 연구", 대한국토․도시계획학회, 국토계획, 42(3).
5 서순탁, 김제국(2006), "개발행위허가제 실태분석과 정채적 시사점 : 경기도용인시 사례를 중심으로", 국토연구원, 국토연구, 49.
6 서순탁(2008), "난개발 방지를 위한 개발행위허가제 개선방안", 경기논단, 10(2).
7 최혁재(2005), "개발행위허가제의 개선방안", 국토연구원, 월간국토, 2005년 5월.
8 하각용, 이재홍, 황희연(2006), "청주시 개발행위허가제의 실태 분석 및 개선방안에 관한 연구", 대한국토․도시계획학회, 2006 정기학술대회.