Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.18598/kcbot.2020.10.1.05

The Effects of Object Size and Reaching Distance on Upper Extremity Movement  

Bae, Su-Young (Dong-A University Daesin Intermediate Care Hospital)
Kim, Tae-Hoon (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, Dongseo University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Korean society of community based occupational therapy / v.10, no.1, 2020 , pp. 51-61 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objectives : The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of object size and reaching distance on kinematic factors of the upper limb while performing arm reaching for normal subjects. Methods : The subjects of this study were 30 university students who were in D university in Busan, and the measuring tool was CMS-70P(Zebris Medizintechnik Gmbh, Germany), a three-dimensional motion analyzer. The task had six conditions. The average velocity of motion, average acceleration, maximum velocity, and the velocity definite number of movements were measured according to changes in object size(2cm, 10cm) and reaching distance(15%, 37.5%, 60%) when they performed arm reaching. The general characteristics of the subject were technical statistics. One-way ANOVA measurement was used to compare variables when the arm reaching task was performed from two object sizes to three reaching distance, and the post-test was conducted with Tukey test. In addition, an independent t-test was used to analyze the kinematic differences according to the two object sizes at three reaching distances. A two-way ANOVA measurement (3×2 Two-way ANOVA measurement) was performed to identify the interaction of the reaching distance(15%, 37.5%, 60%) and the object size(2cm, 10cm). The statistical significance level α was set to .05. Results : When the size of the object increased, the velocity and maximum velocity also increased, but the definite number of velocity decreased. When the reaching distance increased, the velocity and maximum velocity increased, whereas the definite number of velocity decreased. Conclusion : The clinical significance of this study could be utilized as the baseline data for grading object size and reaching distances when the reaching training is implemented for patients whose central nervous system was damaged.
Keywords
Arm reaching; Kinematics; Object size; Reaching distance;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Amini, D., Kannenberg, K., Bodison, S., Chang, P., Colaianni, D., Goodrich., B., et al. (2014). Occupational therapy practice framework: Domain & process (3rd ed.). American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 68(1), 1-48. doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2014.682006
2 Chiba, R., Kaminishi, K., Takakusaki, K., & Ota, J. (2017). Multisensory alterations in visual, vestibular and proprioceptive cues for modeling of postural control. 2017 International Symposium on Micro-NanoMechatronics and Human Science. doi.org/10.1109/MHS.2017.8305207
3 Dean, M., Wu, S. W., & Maloney, L. T. (2007). Trading off speed and accuracy in rapid, goal-directed movements. Journal of Vision, 7(5), 1-12. doi.org/10.1167/7.5.10
4 Fisk, J. D., Fisk, J. D., & Goodale, M. A. (1989). The effects of instructions to subjects on the programming of visually directed reaching movements. Journal of Motor Behavior, 21(1), 5-19. doi.org/10.1080/00222895.1989.10735461   DOI
5 Gori, J., Rioul, O., & Guiard, Y. (2018). Speed-accuracy tradeoff. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 25(5), 1-33. doi.org/10.1145/3231595   DOI
6 Gribble, P. L., Mullin, L. I., Cothros, N., & Mattar, A. (2003). Role of co-contraction in arm movement accuracy. Journal of Neurophysiology, 89(5), 2396-2405. doi.org/10.1152/jn.01020.2002   DOI
7 Gulde, P., & Hermsdorfer, J. (2018). Smoothness metrics in complex movement tasks. Frontiers in Neurology, 9, 1-7. doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.00615   DOI
8 Hussain, N., Murphy, M. A., & Sunnerhagen, K. S. (2018). Upper limb kinematics in stroke and healthy controls using target-to-target task in virtual reality. Frontiers in Neurology, 9, 1-9. doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.00300   DOI
9 Jessop, A., & Pain, M. (2016), Maximum velocities in flexion and extension action for sport. Journal of Human Kinetics, 50(3), 37-44. doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2015-0139   DOI
10 Jones, T. A. (2017). Motor compensation and its effects on neural reorganization after stroke. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 18, 267-280. doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2017.26   DOI
11 Kim, K. S., Yoo, H. S., Jung, D. H., & Jeon, H. S. (2010). Analysis of movement time and trunk motions according to target distances and use of sound and affected side during upper limb reaching task in patients with hemiplegia. Physical Therapy Korea, 17(1), 36-42.
12 Kramer, P., & Hinojosa, J. (2011). Frames of reference for pediatric occupational therapy (3rd ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. doi.org/10.5014/ajot.49.7.733
13 Lundy-Ekman, L. (2013). Neuroscience-E-Book: Fundamentals for rehabilitation (4th ed.). Elsevier Health Sciences.
14 Majsak, M. J., Kaminski, T., Gentile, A. M., & Flanagan, J. R. (1998). The reaching movements of patients with Parkinson's disease under self-determined maximal speed and visually cued conditions. Brain, 121(4), 755-766. doi.org/10.1093/brain/121.4.755   DOI
15 Mandon, L., Boudarham, J., Robertson, J., Bensmail, D., Roche, N., Roby-Brami, A. (2016). Faster reaching in chronic spastic stroke patients comes at the expense of arm-trunk coordination. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 30(3), 209-220.   DOI
16 Massie, C. L., & Malcolm, M. P. (2012). Instructions emphasizing speed improves hemiparetic arm kinematics during reaching in stroke. Neurorehabilitation, 30(4), 341-350. doi.org/10.3233/NRE-2012-0765   DOI
17 Messier, J., & Kalaska, J. F. (1999). Comparison of variability of initial kinematics and endpoints of reaching movements. Experimental Brain Research, 125, 139-152. doi.org/10.1007/s002210050669   DOI
18 Newell, K. M. (1986). Constraints on the development of coordination. Motor Development in Children: Aspects of Coordination and Control, 341-360. doi.org/10.1007/97894-009-4460-2_19
19 Peternel, L., Sigaud, O., & Babic, J. (2017). Unifying speed-accuracy trade-off and cost-benefit trade-off in human reaching movements. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11, 615. doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00615   DOI
20 Newell, K. M., & Valvano, J. (1998). Movement science: Therapeutic intervention as a constraint in learning and relearning movement skills. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 5, 51-57. doi.org/10.3109/110381298 09035730   DOI
21 Plamondon, R. (1995). A kinematic theory of rapid human movements. Biological Cybernetics, 72, 295-307. doi.org/10.1007/s004220050132   DOI
22 Potgieser, A. R. E., & De Jong, B. M. (2011). Different distal-proximal movement balances in right-hand left-hand writing may hint at differential premotor cortex involvement. Human Movement Science, 30, 1072-1078. doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2011.02.005   DOI
23 Rose, D. J., & Christina, R. W. (2006). A multilevel approach to the study of motor control and learning (2nd ed.). Benjamin Cummings, Allyn & Bacon.
24 Roy, E., Kalbfleisch, L., Bryden, P., Barbour, K., & Black, S. (2000). Visual aiming movements in Alzheimer's disease. Brain and Cognition, 10, 380-384.
25 Shumway-Cook, A., & Woollacott, M. H. (2012). Motor control: Translating research into clinical practice (4th ed.). Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins.
26 Thelen, E., Skala, K. D., & Kelso, J. S. (1987). The dynamic nature of early coordination: Evidence from bilateral leg movements in young infants. Developmental Psychology, 23(2), 179-186. doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.23.2.179   DOI
27 Tresch, M. C., Saltiel, P., D'Avella, A., & Bizzi, E. (2002). Coordination and localization in spinal motor systems. Brain Research Reviews, 40(1-3), 66-79.   DOI
28 Wang, S. M., Kuo, L. C., Ouyang, W. C., Hsu, H. M., & Ma, H. I. (2018). Effects of object size and distance on reaching kinematics in patients with schizophrenia. Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy, 31(1), 22-29. doi.org/10.1177/1569186118759610   DOI
29 Vingerhoets, G. (2014). Contribution of the posterior parietal cortex in reaching, grasping, and using objects and tools. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(151), 1-17. doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00151   DOI
30 Volman, M. J. M., Wijnroks, A., & Vermeer, A. (2002). Effect of task context on reaching performance in children with spastic hemiparesis. Clinical Rehabilitation, 16, 684-692. doi.org/10.1191/0269215502cr540oa   DOI
31 Wierzbicka, M. M., Wiegner, A. W., & Shahani, B. T. (1986). Role of agonist and antagonist muscles in fast arm movements in man. Experimental Brain Research, 63(2), 331-340. doi.org/10.1007/BF00236850
32 Wing, A. M., & Miller, E. (1984). Research note: Peak velocity timing invariance. Psychological Research, 46, 121-127. doi.org/10.1007/BF00308597   DOI
33 Wu, C. Y., Lin, K. C., Lin, K. H., Chang, C. W., & Chen, C. L. (2005). Effects of task constraints on reaching kinematics by healthy adults. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 100, 983-994. doi.org/10.2466/pms.100.4.983-994   DOI
34 Wu, C. Y., Trombly, C. A., Lin, K. C., & Tickle-Degnen, L. (2000). A kinematic study of contextual effects on reaching performance in persons with and without stroke: Influences of object availability. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 81(1), 95-101. doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2000.0810095   DOI
35 Yoo, W. G., Park, J. H., & Kim, M. H. (2005). Velocity of reaching and vertical displacement during various bimanual reaching target activities. The Journal of Korean Society of Occupational Therapy, 13(2), 41-49.
36 Yoo, W. G., Park, J. H., Shin, H. K., Yoo, E. Y., & Choi, J. D. (2004). Effects of distance of target on the movement of arm and trunk during. The Journal of Korean Society of Occupational Therapy, 12(2), 61-71.