Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7745/KJSSF.2012.45.1.016

Rice Yield Response to Biochar Application Under Different Water Managements Practices  

Jung, Won-Kyo (Delta Research Center, University of Missouri-Columbia)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer / v.45, no.1, 2012 , pp. 16-19 More about this Journal
Abstract
Increasing rice grain yield is critical for feeding rapid increasing of Asian population. However, global warming effect may be negative for sustainable rice production. Therefore it is essential to develop technologies not only for increasing grain yield but also for reducing global warming effect. Biochar, which is carbonized biomass, has a great potential of carbon sequestration and soil quality improvement, which can contribute grain yield increasing. In this study, rice yield responses to biochar application on the rice cropping system were evaluated with field experiments under different water management practices at the research farm of the University of Missouri-Columbia Delta Research Center, Portageville, MO. Biochar (i.e., $4Mg\;ha^{-1}$) was produced using field scale pyrolyzer and incorporated into the field 4 months prior to planting. Rice was grown under three different water management practices. Result showed that no significant yield difference was found in the biochar application plots compared to rice hull and control plots from the 2 years field study at the very fertile soil. However, rainfed management results in severe reduction of yield. Research concludes that the biochar application does not significantly influence on rice yield increasing especially for very fertile soils.
Keywords
Rice yield; Climate change; Biochar; Water management;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Asai, H., B.K. Samson, H.K. Stephan, K. Songyikhangsuthor, K. Homma, Y. Kiyono, Y. Inoue, T. Shiraiwa, and T. Horie. 2009. Biochar amendment techniques for upland rice production in Northern Laos 1. Soil physical properties, leaf SPAD and grain yield. Field Crops Research 111:81-84.   DOI
2 Baldock, J., and R. Smernik. 2002. Chemical composition and bioavailability of thermally altered Pinus resinosa (Red pine) wood. Organic Geochemistry 33:1093-1109.   DOI
3 Cayuela. M., P. Kuikman, O. Oenema, R. Bakker, and J. Van Groenigen. 2009. Bioenergy residues applied as soil amendments: $N_2O$ emissions and C sequestration potential. pp. 304.
4 Chan, K., L. Van Zwieten, I. Meszaros, A. Downie, and S. Joseph. 2007. Agronomic values of greenwaste biochar as a soil amendment. Australian Journal of Soil Research 45:629-634.   DOI
5 Del Grosso, S., W. Parton, T. Stohlgren, D. Zheng, D. Bachelet, S. Prince, K. Hibbard, and R. Olson. 2008. Global potential net primary production predicted from vegetation class, precipitation, and temperature. Ecology 89:2117-2126.   DOI
6 Garrett, J.D., F.P. Allgood, B.L. Brown, R.B Grossman, and C.L. Scrivner. 1978. Soils of the southeast Missouri Lowlands. C922, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO.
7 Gero, P. Jonathan, and David D. Turner, 2011. Long-Term Trends in Downwelling Spectral Infrared Radiance over the U.S. Southern Great Plains. J. Climate 24:4831-4843.   DOI
8 Haefele, S.M, C. Knoblauch, M. Gummert, Y. Konboon, and S. Koyama. 2008. Black carbon (biochar) in rice-based systems: Characteristics and opportunities. In: Woods, W.I., Teixeira, W.G., Lehmann, J., Steiner, C., Prins, A.W. and L. Rebellatods. (Eds.). Amazon dark earths: Wim Soembrok's vision. pp. 445-463. Amsterdam: Springer.
9 Hansen, J., M. Sato, P. Kharecha, D. Beerling, R. Berner, V. Masson-Delmotte, M. Pagani, M. Raymo, D. Royer, and J. Zachos. 2008. Target atmospheric $CO_2$: Where should humanity aim? Open Atmospheric Science Journal 2:217-231.   DOI
10 Hillier, J., C. Hawes, G. Squire, A. Hilton, S. Wale, and P. Smith. 2009. The carbon footprints of food crop production. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 7:107-118.   DOI
11 Ji-lu, Z. 2007. Bio-oil from fast pyrolysis of rice husk: Yields and related properties and improvement of the pyrolysis system. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis 80:30-35.   DOI
12 Mathews, J. 2008. Carbon-negative biofuels. Energy Policy 36:940-945.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Lal, R. 2004. Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. Science 304:1623.   DOI
14 Jung, 2011. Characterization of Crop Residue-Derived Biochars Produced by Field Scale Biomass Pyrolyzer. Korean J. Soil Sc. Fert. 44:1-7.   DOI
15 Kuzyakov, Y., I. Subbotina, H. Chen, I. Bogomolova, and X. Xu. 2009. Black carbon decomposition and incorporation into soil microbial biomass estimated by 14C labeling. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 41:210-219.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Laird, D. 2008. The charcoal vision: A win win win scenario for simultaneously producing bioenergy, permanently sequestering carbon, while improving soil and water quality. Agronomy Journal 100:178.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Lehmann, J. 2007. A handful of carbon. Nature 447:143-144.   DOI
18 Lehmann, J. 2009. Biological carbon sequestration must and can be a win-win approach. Climatic Change 97:459-463.   DOI
19 Oasmaa, A., D. Elliott, and S. Müller. 2009. Quality control in fast pyrolysis bio-oil production and use. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy 28:404-409.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Peng, S., J. Huang, J. Sheehy, R. Laza, R. Visperas, X. Zhong, G. Centeno, G. Khush, and K. Cassman. 2004. Rice yields decline with higher night temperature from global warming. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101:9971.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Prasad, P., K. Boote, and L. Allen. 2006. Species, ecotype and cultivar differences in spikelet fertility and harvest index of rice in response to high temperature stress. Field crops research 95:398-411.   DOI
22 Tagoe, S.O., Takatsugu Horiuchi, T., and T. Matsui. 2008. Effects of carbonized and dried chicken manures on the growth, yield, and N content of soybean. Plant Soil 306:211-220.   DOI
23 Reichenauer, T.G, S. Panamulla, S. Subasinghe, and B. Wimmer. 2009. Soil amendments and cultivar selection canimprove rice yield in salt-influenced (tsunami-affected) paddy fields in Sri Lanka. Environ. Geochem. Health, 31:573-579.   DOI
24 Searchinger, T., R. Heimlich, R. Houghton, F. Dong, A. Elobeid, J. Fabiosa, S. Tokgoz, D. Hayes, and T. Yu. 2008. Use of US croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change. Science 319:1238.   DOI
25 Smith, P., D. Martino, Z. Cai, D. Gwary, H. Janzen, P. Kumar, B. McCarl, S. Ogle, F. O'Mara, and C. Rice. 2008. Greenhouse gas mitigation in agriculture. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 363:789.   DOI
26 Wang, G., S. Chhin, and W. Bauerle. 2006. Effect of natural atmospheric $CO_2$ fertilization suggested by open-grown white spruce in a dry environment. Global Change Biology 12:601-610.   DOI