Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7745/KJSSF.2011.44.6.1245

Bioenergy and Material Production Potential by Life Cycle Assessment in Swine Waste Biomass  

Kim, Seung-Hwan (Biogas Research Center, Hankyong National University)
Kim, Chang-Hyun (Biogas Research Center, Hankyong National University)
Yoon, Young-Man (Biogas Research Center, Hankyong National University)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer / v.44, no.6, 2011 , pp. 1245-1251 More about this Journal
Abstract
As a result of the growing livestock industry, varieties of organic solid and waste biomass are be generated in swine breeding and slaughtering stages. Anaerobic digestion is a promising alternative for the treatment of livestock waste biomass, as well as for the material recovery and energy production. Objectives of this study were to analyze the biochemical methane potential of swine waste biomasses that were generated from swine pen and slaughterhouse and to investigate the material recovery and methane yield per head. As pig waste biomass, swine slurry, blood, intestine residue, and digestive tract content were collected for investigation from pig farmhouse and slaughterhouse. The $B_{th}$ (Theoretical methane potential) and $B_0$ (Biochemical methane potential) of swine slurry generating in swine breeding stage were 0.525 and $0.360Nm^3\;kg^{-1}-VS_{added}$, the ratio of degradation ($B_0/B_{th}$) was 68.6%. $B_{th}$ of blood, intestine residue, and digestive tract content were 0.539, 0.664, and $0.517Nm^3\;kg^{-1}-VS_{added}$, and $B_0$ were 0.405, 0.213, and $0.240Nm^3\;kg^{-1}-VS_{added}$, respectively. And the ratio of degradation showed 75.1, 32.1, and 46.4% in blood, intestine residue, and digestive tract content. Material yield of swine waste biomass was calculated as TS 73.79, VS 46.75, TN 5.58, $P_2O_5$ 1.94, and $K_2O$ $2.91kg\;head^{-1}$. And methane yield was $16.58Nm^3\;head^{-1}$. In the aspect that slaughterhouse is a large point source of waste biomass, while swine farmhouse is non-point source, the feasibility of an anaerobic digestion using the slaughtering waste biomass need to be assessed in the economical aspect between the waste treatment cost and the profitable effect by methane production.
Keywords
Swine waste; Biomass; Material recovery; Methane potential;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Lee, C.Y. 2007. Characteristics of methane production from piggery manure using anaerobic digestion. J. KORRA. 15(3):113-118.
2 Lee, M.Y., C.W. Suh, H.S. Jeong. S.H. Lee, and H.S. Shin. 2004. A study model and estimation of ammonia inhibitionon onanaerobic methane fermentation. J. KSEE. 2004:86-99.
3 Lee, Y.S., S.M. Hong, H.S. Park, U.S. Lee, and S.E. Oh. 2004. A comparative study of single and two-phase anaerobic system for distillery waster treatment in pilot plant. J. KSEE 13:485-192.
4 MIFAFF. 2009. The study on design and establishment of biomass town. Gwacheon, Korea (in Korean).
5 MIFAFF. 2011. Statistics for agriculture, fishery, and food (in Korean).
6 Owen, W.P., D.C. Stuckey, J.B. Healy, L.Y. Young, and P.L. McCarty. 1979. Bioassay for monitoring biochemical methane potential and anaerobic toxicity. Water Res. Vol. 13:485-492.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 RDA. 2002. Technique for application of livestock liquid fertilizer. Suwon, Korea (in Korean).
8 Hejnfelt, A. and I. Angelidaki. 2009. Anaerobic digestion of slaughterhouse by products. Biomass Bioenerg. 33(2009):1046-1054.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Boyle, W.C. 1976. Energy recovery from sanitary landflls - a review. In: Schlegel, H.G. and Barnea, S. (Hrsg.): Microbial Energy Conversion: Oxford, Pergamon Press.
10 Hansen, T.L, J.E. Schmidt, I. Angelidaki, E. Marca, J. Cour Jansen, H. Mosboek, and T.H. Christensen. 2004. Method for determination of methane potentials of solid organic easte. Waste Manage. 24:393-400.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Heo, B.D., S.H. Kim, J.T. Yu, Y.K. Go, and S.M. Yang. 2002. The utilization of biogas production technology by anaerobic co-digestion using food waste and animal wastes. J. KORRA 9(4);29-34.
12 Kim, J.M., J.T. Lee, and M.H. Cho. 2009. Characteristics of biogas production from organic wastes by BMP test. Theor. Appl. Chem. Eng.15(2):1578-1581.
13 Kim, S.H. and H.S. Shin. 2009. Acidogenesis of lipids containing wastewater ib anaerobic sequencing batch reactor. J. KSEE. 31(12):1075-1080.
14 Kim, S.H., H.C. Kim, C.H. Kim, and Y.M. Yoon. 2010. The measurement of biochemical methane potential in the several organic waste resources. Korean J. Soil Sci. Fert. 43(3):356-362.
15 KREI. 2007. Polacy issues and strategies to boost biiomass utilization in agricultural sector: Problems and issues in Korea. Seoul, Korea.
16 Williams, A., M. Amat-Marco, and M.D. Collins. 1996. Pylogenetic analysis of Butyrivibrio strains reveals three distinct groups of species within the Clostridium subphylm of gram-positive bacteria. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Micr. 46:195-199.
17 Yoon, Y.M., C.H. Kim, Y.J. Kim, and H.T. Park, 2009a. The economical evaluation of biogas production facility of pig waste. Kor. J. Agr. Manag. Pol. 36(1):137-157.
18 Yoon, Y.M., Y.J. Kim, and C.H. Kim. 2009b. The evaluation of economical efficiency to composting and liquefying process of biomass discharged in pig breeding. Agr. Econ. 31(6):39-62.
19 RDA. 2009. The study to re-stablish the amount and major compositions of manure from livestock. Suwon. Korea.
20 Sorensen, A.H,. M. Winther-Nielsen, and B.K. Ahring. 1991. Kinetics of lactate, acetate and propionate in unadapted and lactate-adapted thermophilic, anaerobic sewage sludge: the influence of sludge adaptation for start-up of thermophilic UASB-reactors. Appl. Microbiol. Biot. 34:823-827.
21 Yoon, Y.M., H.C. Kim, J.S. Yoo, S.H. Kim, S.G. Homg, and C.H. Kim. 2011. The performance of anaerobic co-digester of swine slurry and food waste. Korean J. Soil Sci. Fert. 44(1):104-111.   DOI
22 Beuvink, J.M., S.F. Spoelstra, and R.J. Hogendrop. 1992. An automated method ofr measuring the time course of gas production of feedstuffs incubated with buffered rumen fluid. Neth. J. Agri. Sci. 40:401-407.
23 Angelidaki, I., M. Alves, D. Bolzonella, L. Borzacconi, J. L. Campos, A. J. Guwy, S. Kalyuzhnyi, P. Jenicek, and J. B. van Lier. 2009. Defining the biomethane potential (BMP) of solid organic wastes and energy crops: a proposed protocol for batch assays. Water Sci. Technol. 59(5):927-934.   DOI   ScienceOn
24 APHA. 1998. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 20th ed. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC, USA.