Browse > Article

The Simulation of Pore Size Distribution from Unsaturated Hydraulic Conductivity Data Using the Hydraulic Functions  

Yoon, Young-Man (Biogas Research Center, Hankyong National University)
Kim, Jeong-Gyu (College of Life Science and Biotechnology, Korea University)
Shin, Kook-Sik (College of Agriculture and Life Science, Hankyong National University)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer / v.43, no.4, 2010 , pp. 407-414 More about this Journal
Abstract
Until now, the pore size distribution, PSD, of soil profile has been calculated from soil moisture characteristic data by water release method or mercury porosimetry using the capillary rise equation. But the current methods are often difficult to use and time consuming. Thus, in this work, theoretical framework for an easy and fast technique was suggested to estimate the PSD from unsaturated hydraulic conductivity data in an undisturbed field soil profile. In this study, unsaturated hydraulic conductivity data were collected and simulated by the variation of soil parameters in the given boundary conditions (Brooks and Corey soil parameters, ${\alpha}_{BC}=1-5L^{-1}$, b = 1 - 10; van Genuchten soil parameters, ${\alpha}_{VG}=0.001-1.0L^{-1}$, m = 0.1 - 0.9). Then, $K_s$ (1.0 cm $h^{-1})$ was used as the fixed input parameter for the simulation of each models. The PSDs were estimated from the collected K(h) data by model simulation. In the simulation of Brooks-Corey parameter, the saturated hydraulic conductivity, $K_s$, played a role of scaling factor for unsaturated hydraulic conductivity, K(h) Changes of parameter b explained the shape of PSD curve of soil intimately, and a ${\alpha}_{BC}$ affected on the sensitivity of PSD curve. In the case of van Genuchten model, $K_s$ and ${\alpha}_{VG}$ played the role of scaling factor for a vertical axis and a horizontal axis, respectively. Parameter m described the shape of PSD curve and K(h) systematically. This study suggests that the new theoretical technique can be applied to the in situ prediction of PSD in undisturbed field soil.
Keywords
Soil pore size distribution; Hydraulic conductivity; Matric potential; Soil moisture characteristic curve; Simulation;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Ross, P.J. and K.R.J. Smettem. 1993. Describing soil hydraulic properties with sums of Simsof functions. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 57:26-29.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 White. I. and K.M . Perroux. 1989. Estimation of unsaturated hydraulic conductivity from field sorptivity measurements. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 53:324-329.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 van Genuchten, M.Th. 1980. A closed form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 44:892-898.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 van Genuchten, M.Th. and D.R. Nielsen. 1985. On describing and predicting the hydraulic properties of unsaturated soils. Ann. Geophysicae 3:615-628.
5 Vogeler, I., B.E. Clothier. S. R. Green. D.R. Scotter, and R.W. Tillman. 1996. Characterizing water and Solute movement by lime domain re f1etlometry and disk permeametry. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 60:5-12.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 White, I. and M.J. Sully. 1987. Macroscopic and microscopic capillary Iength and time scales from field infiltration. Water Resour. Res. 23: 1514-1522.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 White. I.. M.J. Sully, and K.M. Perroux. 1992. Measurement of surface Soil hydraulic properties: Disk permeameters. tension infiltrometers. and other techniques. p.69-103. In Topp et al.(ed.) Advances in measurement of soil physical properties: Bringing theory into practice. SSSA Spec. Publ. 30. SSSA, Madison. WI.
8 Wooding, R.A. 1968. Steady infiltration from a shallow circular pond. Water Resour. Res. 4:1259-1273.   DOI
9 Yoon,Y., J.G. Kim, and S. Hyun. 2007. Estimating soil water retention in a selected range of soil pores using tension disc infiltrometer. Soil Till. Res. 97:107-116.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Luckner, L., M.Th. van Genuchten. and D.R. Nielsen. 1989. A consistent set of parametric models for the two-phase flow of of immiscible fluids in the subsurface. Water Resour. Res. 25:2187-2193.   DOI
11 Mualem, Y. 1976. A new model predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media. Water Resour. Res. 12 :513-522.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Nachabe. M.H. 1996. Macroscopic capillary length. sorpivity, and shape factor in modeling the infiltration rate. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 60:957-962.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Othmer, H., B. Diekkruger, and M. Kutillek, 1991. Bimodal porosity and unsaturated hydraulic conductivity. J. Soil Sci. 152:139-150.   DOI
14 Perroux, K.M. and I. White. 1988. Designs for disc permeameters. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 52:1205-1215.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Rawls, W.J. and D.L Brakensiek. 1985. prediction of soil water properties for hydrologic modeling. p.293-299. In Jones, E.B. and T.J. Ward. (ed.) Watershed management in the eighties. Proc. Irrig. Drain div.,ASCE. Denver. CO. 30 April-1 May 1985. Am.Soc. Civil Eng ., New York, NY, USA.
16 Reynolds, W.D. and D.E. Elrick. 1991. Determination of hydraulic conductivity using a tension infiltrometer. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 55:633-639.   DOI
17 Timlin, D.J.. L.R. Ahuja. and M.D. Ankeny. 1994. Comparison of three field methods to Characterize apparent macropore conductivity. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 58:278-284.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Saxton. K.E., W.J. Rawls, J.S. Romberger. and R.I. Papendick. 1986. Estimation generalized soil-water characteristics from texture. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 50:1031-1036.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Schaap, M.G. and F.J. Leij. 2000. Improved prediction of unsaturated hydraulic conductivity with the Mualem-van Grnuchten model. Soil.Sci. Soc. Am. J. 64:843-851.   DOI
20 Smetten. K.R.J. and C. Kirkby. 1990. Measuring the hydraulic properties of a stable aggregated soil. J. Hydrol. 17: 1-13.
21 Ahuja, L,R., D.K. Cassel, R.R. Brucc, and B.B. Barnes. 1989. Evaluation of spatial distribution of hydraulic conductivity using effective porosity data. J. Soil Sci. 148:404-411.   DOI
22 Ankeny, M.D., M. Ahmed, T.C. Kaspar, and R. Horton. 1991. Simple field method for determining unsaturated hydraulic conductivity. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 55:467-470.   DOI
23 Ankeny, M.D., T.C. Kaspar. and R. Horton. 1988. Design for an automated tension infiltrometer. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 52:893-895.   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Brooks. R.H. and A.T. Corey. 1964. Hydraulic properties of porous media. Hydrology paper no. 3. Civil Engineering Dep., Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins. CO. USA.
25 Brooks. R.H. and A.T. Corey. 1966. Properties of porous media affecting fluid now. J. lrrig. Drain. Dic. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 92:61-88.
26 Burdine, N.T. 1953. Relalive permeability calculalions from PDS data. Trans. AIME 198:71-77.
27 Everts. C.J . and R.S Kanwar. 1993. Interpreting tension-infiltrometer data for quantifying soil macropores: Some panicle considerations. Trans. ASAE 36(2):423-428.   DOI
28 Campbell. G.S. 1974. A simple method for determining unsaturated conductivity from moisture retention data. J. Soil Sci. 117: 311-314.   DOI
29 Childs, E.C. 1969. An introduction to the physical basis of soil water phenomena. London: Willey. Interscience.
30 Dumer. W. 1992. Predicting the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity using multi. porosity water retention curves. pp.185-202. In van Genuchten, M.Th. el al. (ed.) Indirect methods for estimating the hydraulic properties of unsaturated soils. Univ. of California, Riverside.
31 Logsdon, S.D., E.L. McCoy, R.R. Allmaras. and D.R. Linden. 1993. Macropore characterization by indirect methods. J. Soil Sci. 155: 316-324.   DOI   ScienceOn