Browse > Article

Water Use Efficiency of Barley, Wheat and Millet Affected by Groundwater Table under Lysimeter  

Kim, Beom-Ki (Department of Agricultural Chemistry, Chungbuk National University)
Gong, Hyo-Young (Department of Agricultural Chemistry, Chungbuk National University)
Shim, Jae-Sig (Department of Agricultural Chemistry, Chungbuk National University)
Hong, Soon-Dal (Department of Agricultural Chemistry, Chungbuk National University)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer / v.43, no.3, 2010 , pp. 253-259 More about this Journal
Abstract
This experiment was conducted to evaluate water use efficiency of barley, wheat, and millet as a substitution crop for rice of fallow paddy field. Dry weight (DW), evapotranspiration, and transpiration of crop grown on the lysimeters controlled with 5 levels of groundwater table (GWT), 0, 25, 50, 75, and 100 cm were evaluated for optimum GWT and water use efficiency. All the lysimeters randomized with four replication arrangements were filled up sandy loam and were adjusted to the constant bulk density treated with twice water infiltration from bottom side to upper side of lysimeter. DW of barley, wheat, and millet in the plot of 0cm GWT that is saturated soil showed 34.9%, 44.7%, and 37.1% of that in the plot of 100 cm GWT, respectively showing a serious obstacle in crop growth. Evapotranspiration ratios calculated by evapotranspiration volume (mL) per DW were 166~605 mL for barley, 136~481 mL for wheat, and 81~418 mL for millet showing the order of barley > wheat > millet. Evapotranspiration ratio was increased with decrease of groundwater table that is the condition of moisture saturation. Estimation of GWT for maximum DW of wheat was 76 cm, and those of barley and millet were 100 cm below. The volumetric moisture content of lysimeter soil with cropping was markedly decreased as increase of crop growth because moisture supplying capability by capillary rise of water was less than amount of moisture required by crop.
Keywords
Evapotranspiration; Groundwater table; Lysimeter; Water use efficiency;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Hong, S.D., J.J. Kim, S.J . Cho, and Y.H. Lee. 1989. The interrelationships between yield, transpiration of the tobacco plant, and seasonal meteorological factors during the growing season. Korean J. Soil Sci. Fert. 22:228-233.
2 Pilbeam, C.J., L.P. Simmonds., and A.W. Kavilu. 1995. Transpiration efficiencies of maize and beans in semiarid Kenya. Field crops reaserch 41: 179-188.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Trought, M.C.T. and M.C. Drew. 1980. The development of waterlogging damage in wheat seedlings (Triticum aestivum L.). II. Accumulation and redistribution of nutrient by shool. Plant Soil. 56:187-199.   DOI
4 Locascio, SJ. and A.G. Smajstrla. 1996. Water application scheduling pan evaporation for drip-irrigated tomato. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 121:63-68 .
5 Salisbury, F.B. and C.W. Ross. 1992. Plant physiology (4th ed.). Wadsworth, Inc., Belmont, California. pp 27-65.
6 Suh. H.S. 1971. Studies on the wet-injury resistance of wheat and barley varieties. Korean J. Breeding 3:98-106.
7 Topp, G.C., M. Yanuka., W.D. Zebchul., and S. Zegelin. 1988. Determination of electrical conductivity using time domain reflectometry: Soil and water experiments in coaxial lines. Water Resour. Res. 24:945-952.   DOI
8 Lee, H.S. and J.H. Ku. 1995. Effect of water table depth in different soil texture on quality of barley and wheat grain. Korean J. Crop Sci. 40: 195-202.
9 Levitt, J. 1980. Response of plants to environmental stresses. Academic press. pp 266-288.
10 Norrie. J., M.E.D. Graham., and A. Gosselin. 1994. Potential evapotranspiration as a means of predicting irrigation timing in greenhouse tomatoes grown in peat bags. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 119: 163-168.
11 보리재배. 표준영농교본 118. 2001. 농촌진흥청. pp. 33-38, 191-203.
12 Kang, Y.K., A.R. Richard, and G.C. Anthony. 1996. Interactions among carbon isotope discrimination, water use efficiency and nutrogen nutrition in wheat and berley. Korean J. Crop Sci. 41 :318-331.
13 Kemper, W.D., C.W. Robbinson., and H. J. Bolus. 1961. Growth rates of barley and com as affected by changes in soil moisture stress. Soil Sci. 91 :332-338.   DOI
14 Hwang, J.M., G.S. Tae, and J. S. Uom. 2003. Changes of soil water balance and growth of red paper as affected by growing conditions in the plastic house. Korean J. Bio-Environment Control. 12:38-44.   과학기술학회마을
15 Crawford, R.M.M. 1997. Tolerance of anoxia and ethanol metabolism in germinating seeds. New Phytol. 79:511-517.
16 Drew, M.C. and E.J. Sisworo. 1979. The development of waterlogging damage in young barley plants in relation to plant nutrient status and changes in soil properties. New Physiol. 82 :301-314.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Armeen, R.K., O.S. Claudio, and R.H. David. 2005. Transpiration-use efficiency of barley. Agricultureal and forest meteorology 130: 1-11 .   DOI
18 Belryn, G.P. and J.P. Miksche. 1976. Botanical microtechnique and cytochemistry. The Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames, Iowa, USA
19 작물별 시비처방기준. 2006. 농촌진흥청.
20 통계정보시스템. 2009. 한국농촌경제연구원 농업관측정보센터. http://krei.re.kr/kor/agreport/grain/yoyak.php.
21 농림통계연보, 2008. 농림수산식품부.