Browse > Article

Mobility of Nitrate and Phosphate through Small Lysimeter with Three Physico-chemically Different Soils  

Han, Kyung-Hwa (National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology)
Ro, Hee-Myong (Graduate School of Agricultural Biotechnology, Seoul National University)
Cho, Hyun-Jun (National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology)
Kim, Lee-Yul (National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology)
Hwang, Seon-Woong (National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology)
Cho, Hee-Rae (National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology)
Song, Kwan-Cheol (National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer / v.41, no.4, 2008 , pp. 260-266 More about this Journal
Abstract
Small lysimeter experiment under rain shelter plastic film house was conducted to investigate the effect of soil characteristics on the leaching and soil solution concentration of nitrate and phosphate. Three soils were obtained from different agricultural sites of Korea: Soil A (mesic family of Typic Dystrudepts), Soil B (mixed, mesic family of Typic Udifluvents), and Soil C (artificially disturbed soils under greenhouse). Organic-C contents were in the order of Soil C ($32.4g\;kg^{-1}$) > Soil B ($15.0g\;kg^{-1}$) > Soil A ($8.1g\;kg^{-1}$). Inorganic-N concentration also differed significantly among soils, decreasing in the order of Soil B > Soil C > Soil A. Degree of P saturation (DPS) of Soil C was 178%, about three and fifteen times of Soil B (38%) and Soil A (6%). Prior to treatment, soils in lysimeters (dia. 300 mm, soil length 450 mm) were tabilized by repeated drying and wetting procedures for two weeks. After urea at $150kg\;N\;ha^{-1}$ and $KH_2PO_4$ at $100kg\;P_2O_5\;ha^{-1}$ were applied on the surface of each soil, total volume of irrigation was 213 mm at seven occasions for 65 days. At 13, 25, 35, 37, and 65 days after treatment, soil solution was sampled using rhizosampler at 10, 20, and 30 cm depth and leachate was sampled by free drain out of lysimeter. The volume of leachate was the highest in Soil C, and followed by the order of Soils A and B, whereas the amount of leached nitrate had a reverse trend, i.e. Soil B > Soil A > Soil C. Soil A and B had a significant increase of the nitrate concentration of soil solution at depth of 10 cm after urea-N treatment, but Soil C did not. High nitrate mobility of Soil B, compared to other soils, is presumably due to relatively high clay content, which could induce high extraction of nitrate of soil matrix by anion exclusion effect and slow rate of water flow. Contrary to Soil B, high organic matter content of Soil C could be responsible for its low mobility of nitrate, inducing preferential flow by water-repellency and rapid immobilization of nitrate by a microbial community. Leached phosphate was detected in Soil C only, and continuously increased with increasing amount of leachate. The phosphate concentration of soil solution in Soil B was much lower than in Soil C, and Soil A was below detection limit ($0.01mg\;L^{-1}$), overall similar to the order of degree of P saturation of soils. Phosphate mobility, therefore, could be largely influenced by degree of P saturation of soils but connect with apparent leaching loss only more than any threshold of P accumulation.
Keywords
Lysimeter; Nitrate; Phosphate;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Beven, K. and P. Germann. 1982. Macropores and water flow in soils. Water Resour Res. 18:1311-1325.   DOI
2 van der Zee, S. E. A. T. M. and G. Destouni. 1992. Transport of inorganic solutes in soil. In Interacting processes in soil science. Advances in Soil Science series. Lewis Publishers. Florida, USA.
3 Wagenet, R. J. and W. Chen. 1998. Coupling sorption rate heterogeneity and physical nonequilbrium in soils. In Physical nonequilibrium in soils, Modeling and application. Ann Arbor Press. Michigan, USA.
4 White, R. E., L. K. Heng, and R. B. Edis. 1998. Transfer function approaches to modeling solute transport in soils. In Physical nonequilibrium in soils, Modeling and application. Ann Arbor Press. Michigan, USA.
5 White, R. E. 1985. The influence of macropores on the transport of dissolved and suspended matter through soil. Adv Soil Sci 3:95-120.
6 Denef, K., J. Six, K. Paustian, and R. Merckx. 2001. Importance of macroaggregate dynamics in controlling soil carbon stabilization: short-term effects of physical disturbance induced by dry-wet cycles. Soil Bio Biochem 33: 2145-2153.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Pierzynski, G.. M., J. T. Sims, and G.. F. Vance. 1994. Soils and environmental quality. Lewis Publishers. New York., USA.
8 Beauchemin, S., R. R. Simard, and D. Cluis. 1996. Phosphorus sorption-desorption kinetics of soil under contrasting land uses. J Environ Qual 25:1317-1325.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Leinweber, P. and R. Meissener. 1999. Management effects on forms of phosphorus in soil and leaching losses. Euro J Soil Sci 50:413-424.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Evans, C. D., D. Norris, N. Ostle, H. Grant, E. C. Rowe, C. J. Curtis, B. Reynolds. 2008. Rapid immobilization and leaching of wetdeposited nitrate in upland organic soils. Environmental Pollution 156(3): 636-643.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Danielson, R.E., and P. L. Sutherland. 1986. Porosity. In Method of soil analysis, Part I. Physical and mineralogical method. Agronomy Monograph No. 9(2nd Edition), Madison, USA.
12 Heckrath, G., P. C. Brooks, P. R. Poulton, and K. W. T. Goulding. 1995. Phosphorus leaching from soils containing different phosphorus concentrations in the Broadbalk experiment. J Environ Qual 24:904-910.   DOI
13 Wallis, M. G. and D. J. Horne. 1992. Soil water repellency. Adv Soil Sci 20: 91-146.
14 Chen, C. and R. J. Wagenet. 1992. Simulation of water and chemicals in macropore soils Part 1. Representation of the equivalent macropore influence and its effect on soil water flow. J Hydrol 130:105-126.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Sposito, G.. 1989. The chemistry of soils. Oxford university press. New York., USA.