Browse > Article

Evaluation of Effective Sensing Distance and Measurement Efficiency for Ground-Based Remote Sensors with Different Leaf Distribution in Tobacco Plant  

Jeong, Hyun-Cheol (National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology)
Hong, Soon-Dal (Department of Agricultural Chemistry, Chungbuk National University)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer / v.41, no.2, 2008 , pp. 126-136 More about this Journal
Abstract
Tobacco plants grown in pots by sand culture for 70 days after transplanting were used to evaluate the sensing distance and measurement efficiency of ground-based remote sensors. The leaf distribution of tobacco plant and sensing distance from the sensors to the target leaves were controlled by two removal methods of leaves, top-down and bottom-up removal. In the case of top-down removal, the canopy reflectance was measured by the sensor located at a fixed position having an optimum distance from the detector to the uppermost leaf of tobacco every time that the higher leaves were one at a time. The measurement of bottom-up removal, a the other hand, was conducted in the same manner as that of the top-down removal except that the lower leaves were removed one by one. Canopy reflectance measurements were made with hand held spectral sensors including the active sensors such as $GreenSeeker^{TM}$ red and green, $Crop\;Circle\;ACS-210^{TM}$ red and amber, the passive sensors of $Crop\:Circle^{TM}$, and spectroradiometer $SD2000^{TM}$. The reflectance indices by all sensors were generally affected by the upper canopy condition rather than lower canopy condition of tobacco regardless of sensor type, passive or active. The reflectance measurement by $GreenSeeker^{TM}$ was affected sensitively at measurement distance longer than 120 cm, the upper limit of effective sensing distance, beyond which measurement errors are appreciable. In case of the passive sensors that has no upper limit of effective distance and $Crop\;Circle^{TM}(ACS210)$ that has the upper limit of effective sensing distance specified with 213 cm, longer than that of estimated distance, the measurement efficiency affected by the sensing distance showed no difference. This result suggests that it is necessary to use the sensor specified optimum distance. The result revealed that active sensors are more superior than their passive counterparts in establishing between the relative ratio of reflectance index and the dry weight of tobacco treated by top-down removal, and in the evaluation of biomass. $The\;Crop\;Circle\;ACS-210^{TM}$ red was proved to have the highest efficiency of measurement, followed by $Crop\;Circle^{TM}(ACS210)$ amber and $GreenSeeker^{TM}$ red, $Crop\;Circle^{TM}$ passive, $GreenSeeker^{TM}$ green, and spectroradiometer, in descending order.
Keywords
Leaf distribution of tobacco; Normalized Diffeerence Vegetation Index(NDVI); Ground-based Remote Sensor;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Chappelle, E.W., M.S. Kim, and J.E. McMurtrey. 1992. Ratio analysis of reflectance spectra(RARS)-An algorithm for the remote estimation of the concentration of chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and carotenoids in soybean leaves. Remote Sens. Environ. 39(3):239-247.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Gitelson, A.A., M.N. Merzlyak, and H.K. Lichtenthaler. 1996. Detection of red edge position and chlorophyll content by reflectance measurements near 700 nm. J. Plant Physiology. 148:501-508.   DOI
3 Gitelson, A.A., M.N. Merzlyak, and O.B. Chivkunova. 2001. Optical properties and nondestructive estimation of anthocyanin content in plant leaves. Photochemistry and Photobiology 74(1) : 38-45.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Gausman, H.W. (1974) Leaf reflectance of near-infrared. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing. 40(2):183-191.
5 Hong, S.D. and J.J. Kim. 2003. Agricultural application of ground remote sensing. Korean J. Soil Sci. Fert. 36(2):92-103.
6 Kim H.K. 2006. Estimation of red pepper/(Capsicum annum L.) biomass by reflectance indices with ground-based remote sensor. Master's Thesis, Chungbuk National University, Korea.
7 Kim Y.H., and S.Y. Hong. 2007. Estimation of nondestructive rice leaf nitrogen content using ground optical sensors. Korean J. Soil Sci. Fert. 40(6):435-441.
8 Kong H.Y. 2007. Estimation of N-fertilizer level and production of rice/(Oryza sativa L.) using ground-based remote sensor. Master Thesis, Chungbuk National University, Korea.
9 Lillesand, T.M., R.W. Kiefer, and J.W. Chipman. 2004. Remote sensing and image interpretation. 5th ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
10 Osborne, S.L., J.S. Schepers, D.D. Francis, and M.R. Schlemmer, 2002a. Use of spectral radiance to estimate in-season biomass and grain yield in nitrogen- and water-stressed corn. Crop Sci. 42:165-171.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Richardson, A.J., and C.L. Wiegand. 1977. Distinguishing vegetation from soil background information, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 43:1541-1552.
12 Knipling, E.B. 1970. Physical and physiological basis for the reflectance of visible and near-infrared radiation from vegetation. Remote Sensing of Environment. 1:155-159.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Tucker, C.J. 1979. Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring
14 Gausman, H.W. 1977. Reflectance of leaf components. Remote Sensing of environment. 6(1):1-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Huete, A.R. 1988. Soil and atmosphere influences on the spectra of partial canopies. Remote Sensing of Environ. 25:89-106.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Wiegand, C.L., A.J. Richardson, D.E. Escobar, and A.H. Gerbermann. 1991. Vegetation indices in crop assessments. Remote Sensing of Environment 35 : 105-119.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Kang S.S. 2007. Evaluation for Biomass and Nitrogen Nutrition of Crops by Reflectance Indices of Ground-based Remote Sensors. Ph.D. Thesis, Chungbuk National University, Korea.
18 Cater, G.A. and A.K. Knapp. 2001. Leaf optical properties in higher plants: Linking spectral characteristics to stress and chlorophyll concentration. American Journal of Botany. 88(4):677-684.   DOI
19 Jackson, R.D. (1986) Remote sensing of biotic and abiotic plant stress. Annual Review of Phytopathology. 24:265-287.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Cater, G.A. and B.A. Spiering. 2002. Optical properties of intact leaves for estimating chlorophyll concentration. J. Environ. Qual. 31:1424-1432.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Jackson, R.D., and A.R. Huete. 1991. Interpreting vegetation indexes. Preventive Veterinary Medicine. 11(3-4):185-200.   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Deering, D.W., Jr., J.W. Rouse, R.H. Haas, and J.A. Schell. 1975. Measuring forage production of grazing units from Landsat MSS data, Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on remote sensing of environment, 06-10 October, Ann Arbor, Michigan (ERIM). 2:1169-1178.
23 Jackson, R.D., 1983. Spectral indexes in N-space, Remote Sensing of Environment 13(5):409-421.   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Bauer, M.E., 1975. The role of remote sensing in determining the distribution and yield of crops, Advance in Agronomy. 27:271-304.   DOI
25 Carter, G.A. 1993. Responses of leaf spectral reflectance to plant stress. American Journal of Botany. 80(3):239-243.   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Slaton, M.R., E.R. Hunt, and W.K. Smith, 2001. Estimating nearinfrared leaf reflectance from leaf structural characteristics, American Journal of Botany, 88(2):278-284.   DOI
27 Gilabert, M.A., J. Gonzalez-Piqueras, F.J. Garcia-Haro, J. Melia. 2002. A generalized soil-adjusted vegetation index. Remote Sensing of Environment 82:303-310.   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Hatfield, J.L. and P.J. Pinter, Jr. 1993. Remote sensing for crop protection. Crop protection, 12(6):403-414.   DOI   ScienceOn