Browse > Article

Evaluation on national environmental functionality of farming on soil loss using the USLE and replacement cost method  

Hyun, Byung-Keun (Research Management Bureau, Rural Development Administration)
Kim, Moo-Sung (Department of Oriental Medicinal Material and Processing, Kyung-Hee Univ.)
Eom, Ki-Cheol (National Institute of Agriculture Science & Technology)
Kang, Ki-Kyung (National Institute of Agriculture Science & Technology)
Yun, Hong-Bae (National Institute of Agriculture Science & Technology)
Seo, Myung-Cheol (National Institute of Agriculture Science & Technology)
Sung, Ki-Seog (National Institute of Agriculture Science & Technology)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer / v.35, no.6, 2002 , pp. 361-371 More about this Journal
Abstract
Multifunctionality of agriculture has been an important international issue in terms of environmental benefits and public concerns. We calculated soil loss mass in national basis using the USLE, and attempted to evaluate its economical benefits by replacement cost method. Soil loss mass ranged from 1.4 to $18MT\;ha^{-1}\;yr^{-1}$ was fairly fitted to measured values for 13 cropping systems. In national basis, the factors in USLE were evaluated as: 429.4 for rainfall and runoff factor. R, 0.15 for soil erodibility factor, K, 1.72 for topographic factor, LS, 0.275 for cover and management factor, C, and 0.856 for support practice factor, P. The soil loss estimated from upland farming using the USLE was $26.1MT\;ha^{-1}\;yr^{-1}$, but soil loss from the bare soil was $110.8MT\;ha^{-1}\;yr^{-1}$, the ratio of soil loss from upland farming to bare soil was 23 percents. Function of reducing soil loss in comparison with the bare soil was $84.7MT\;ha^{-1}\;yr^{-1}$, of which national soil loss mass was 62.6 million MT per annum in south Korea. Agriculture economic replacement cost of soil loss reduction was 497 billion Wons(398 million dollars) for the cost of upland soil dressing. For conservational purposes to increase the environmental benefits of upland farming, the agricultural practice including contour, strip cropping, terracing and division ditches should be implemented.
Keywords
Upland farming; Multifuctionality; Function of reducing soil loss; USLE;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Jung, P. K. 1984. Rainfall Factor and Its Relationship to Soil Loss. The Sino-Korea bilateral symposium on soil and water conservation of sloped farm land. June 5-6, p43-58
2 Oh, S. J., S. K. Kim.. Y. K, Son., K. H. Jung., and M H. Koh. 2002. Model development for easily estimating soil loss amount in arable lanc(Application of farming method materials. In pressing. Rural Development Administraon(RDA)
3 Wischmeier, W. H., and D. D. Smith. 1978. Predicting rainfall erosion losses- a guide to conservation planning. U.S. Department of Agriculture.Agriculture Handbook NO. 537. pp58
4 Jung, B. G., K. B. Jung., B. M. Lee., and J. H. Kim.1999. Annual Report of the Monitoring Project on Agro-Environmental Quality. National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology(NIAST). p13
5 Jung, P. K., M. H. Koh., and K. T. Um. 1985.Discussion of Cropping Management factor for Estimating Soil Loss. Joural of Kordan Society of Soil Science and Fertilizer. 18(1):7-13
6 Oh, S. I., S. S. Kim., and C. Y. Kang, 2001. Valuation of Multifunctionality of Agriculture (final report).Korea Rural Economic Instiute(KREI). pp86
7 Oh, S. J., M. H. Um.. and, P. K, Jung. 1990. Analysis of soil loss amount according to plastic film mulching.Annual Report of Agriculture Science Institute(ASI) ASI. p158-163
8 Cho K. K., and S. W. Park. 1981. Soil erosion on upland slopes-mainly on topographic factor. The Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers. 23(2): 54-60
9 Ministry of Agriculture and Forest(MAF). 2001b. Agricultural and Forestry Statistical Yearbook. MAF.pp320
10 Jung. P. K., and M. H. Koh. 1981. Analysis of Rainfall pattern. Annual Report of Agriculture Science Institute(ASI). ASI. 312-333
11 WTO homepage. 2001. http://www-heva.wto-ministeria1.org/eng1ish/thewto_e/minist_e/minOl_e/mindecl_e.htm
12 Kentaro Yoshida. 1998. An Economic Evaluation of Multifuctional Roles of Agriculture and Rural Areas in Japan. National Research Institute of Agricultural Economic (NRIAE). Annual Report of NRIAE 52(4): 113-138
13 Ministry of Agriculture and Forest(MAF). 2001a. The propelling organization of Direct Payment in Less Favored Area. http://www.maf.go.kr/html/mains/depart.asp
14 Um, K, T., K. C. Eom., K. H. Yun., D. C. Noh.. Y. H. Kim., and H. S. Lee. 1992. General Descnoption of Korea Soi1s.(Soi1 Survey Materials No. 13). National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology(NIAST). p511
15 Canada. 2002. http://www.gov.on.ca/OMAFRA/english/engineer/facts/00-OOl .htm
16 Eom K. C., K. Y. Jung., S. E. Lee., B. H. Song., D. R. Choi., and S. H. Choi. 1996. Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of the Effect of Upland Crop Cultivation on the Conservation of Natural Environments. Annual Report of agricultural special project(fina1 paper). Rural Development Administration (RDA). pp109
17 Korea Forest Service(KFS). 2000. Forest and Forestry Technique( 1 . General Forest). p35-53
18 Agriculture Science Institute(ASI). 1986. Upland Soil of Korea. pp562