Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41610-020-00160-z

Diet composition of the Korean wild boar Sus scrofa coreanus (Suidae) at Mt. Jeombongsan, Korea  

Shin, Hyung-Min (Department of Biological Science, Ajou University)
Kim, Jihee (Department of Biological Science, Ajou University)
Jin, Seon Deok (Division of Climate & Ecology, National Institute of Ecology)
Won, Ho-Yeon (Division of Climate & Ecology, National Institute of Ecology)
Park, Sangkyu (Department of Biological Science, Ajou University)
Publication Information
Journal of Ecology and Environment / v.44, no.3, 2020 , pp. 143-154 More about this Journal
Abstract
Background: Korean wild boars (Sus scrofa coreanus Heude), because of their adaptability, are a widespread large mammal; however, they sometimes cause problems by invading farms and eating the crops, creating insufficiencies of some foods in South Korea. To understand the diet composition of Korean wild boars according to sex and body size, we collected their feces from Mt. Jeombongsan, Seoraksan National Park, South Korea. The sizes of fecal samples were measured, and genomic DNA was extracted from the samples. We amplified specific loci targeting plants (rbcL and trnL) and animals (COI) to detect the food sources of this omnivore and amplified the ZF and SRY regions to determine the sex. Results: In the wild boar feces, Rosaceae and Bryophyte were the most frequently detected plant food sources at the family level and Diptera and Haplotaxida were the most frequently detected animal food sources at the order level. As a result of sex determination, the sex ratio of wild boars collected in the Mt. Jeombongsan area was approximately 1:1. Our result suggested that there is no significant difference between the diet composition of male and female boars. Based on the average cross-sectional area of the feces, the top 25% were classified into the large body size group and the bottom 25% were classified into the small body size group. The large body size group mainly preferred Actinidiaceae, and the small body size group most frequently consumed Fagaceae. The diet of the large body size group was more diverse than the small body size group. Conclusions: Our results showed that the wild boars preferred Rosaceae, especially Sanguisorba and Filipendula, as plant food sources, and Diptera and Coleoptera of Insecta as animal food sources. Based on the results, the dietary preferences of wild boar appear to be distinguished by not their sex but their body size. Our study could help to elucidate the feeding ecology and population structure of wild boar, as well as address conservation and management issues.
Keywords
Sus scrofa; Mt. Jeombongsan; Feces; Diet; Sex determination;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 4  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Valentini A, Pompanon F, Taberlet P. DNA barcoding for ecologists. Trends Ecol Evol. 2008;24(2):110-7.   DOI
2 Vestheim H, Jarman SN. Blocking primers to enhance PCR amplification of rare sequences in mixed samples - a case study on prey DNA in Antarctic krill stomachs. Front Zool. 2008;5(1):12.   DOI
3 Welander J. Spatial and temporal dynamics of wild boar (Sus scrofa) rooting in a mosaic landscape. J Zool. 2000;252(2):263-71.   DOI
4 Wilcox JT, Vuren DH. Wild pigs as predators in Oak Woodlands of California. J Mammal. 2009;90(1):114-8.   DOI
5 Wirthner S, Schutz M, Page-Dumroese DS, Busse MD, Kirchner JW, Risch AC. Do changes in soil properties after rooting by wild boars (Sus scrofa) affect understory vegetation in Swiss hardwood forests? Can J For Res. 2012;42(3):585-92.   DOI
6 Wishart J, Lapidge S, Braysher M, Sarre SD, Hone J. Observations on effects of feral pig (Sus scrofa) age and sex on diet. Wildl Res. 2015;42(6):470-4.   DOI
7 Kim Y, Cho S, Choung Y. Habitat preference of wild boar (Sus scrofa) for feeding in cool-temperate forests. J Ecol Environ. 2019;43(1):30.   DOI
8 KNPRI. Seoraksan National Park Resource Investigation - Jeombongsan. Korea National Park Research Institute: Namwon; 2012. (in Korean).
9 KNPRI. A survey of the distribution of Sus scrofa in urban national parks. Korea National Park Research Institute: Wonju; 2016. (in Korean).
10 Kolodziej K, Theissinger K, Brun J, Schulz HK, Schulz R. Determination of the minimum number of microsatellite markers for individual genotyping in wild boar (Sus scrofa) using a test with close relatives. Eur J Wildl Res. 2012;58(3):621-8.   DOI
11 Leray M, Yang JY, Meyer CP, Mills SC, Agudelo N, Ranwez V, Boehm JT, Machida RJ. A new versatile primer set targeting short fragment of the mitochondrial COI region for metabarcoding metazoan diversity: application for characterizing coral reef fish gut contents. Front Zool. 2013;10(1):34.   DOI
12 Kress WJ, Erickson DL. A two-locus global DNA barcode for land plants: the coding rbcL gene complements the non-coding trnH-psbA spacer region. PLoS One. 2007;2(6):e508.   DOI
13 Lee SM, Lee WS. Diet of the wild boar (Sus scrofa) in Agricultural Land of Geochang, Gyeongnam Province, Korea. Jour Korean For Soc. 2014;103(2):307-12.   DOI
14 Lee SM, Lee EJ. Diet of the wild boar (Sus scrofa): implications for management in forest-agricultural and urban environments in South Korea. Peer J. 2019;7:e7835.   DOI
15 Morden CJC, Weladjia RB, Ropstad E, Dahl E, Holand O. Use of faecal pellet size to differentiate age classes in female Svalbard reindeer Rangifer tarandus platyrhynchus. Wildl Biol. 2011;17(4):441-8.   DOI
16 Riaz T, Shehzad W, Viari A, Pompanon F, Taberlet P, Coissac E. ecoPrimers: inference of new DNA barcode markers from whole genome sequence analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39(21):e145.   DOI
17 Robeson MS, Khanipov K, Golovko G, Wisely SM, White MD, Bodenchuck M, Smyser TJ, Fofanov Y, Fierer N, Piaggio AJ. Assessing the utility of metabarcoding for diet analyses of the omnivorous wild pig (Sus scrofa). Ecol Evol. 2018;8(1):185-96.   DOI
18 Kohn MH, Wayne RK. Facts from feces revisited. Trends Ecol Evol. 1997;12(6):223-7.   DOI
19 Soininen EM, Valentini A, Coissac E, Miquel C, Gielly L, Brochmann C, Brysting AK, Sonstebo JH, Ims RA, Yoccoz NG, Taberlet P. Analysing diet of small herbivores: the efficiency of DNA barcoding coupled with high-throughput pyrosequencing for deciphering the composition of complex plant mixtures. Front Zool. 2009;6(1):16.   DOI
20 Skogland T. Sex ratio in relation to maternal condition and parental investment in wild reindeer Rangifer t. tarandus. Oikos. 1986;46(3):417-9.   DOI
21 Taberlet P, Coissac E, Pompanon F, Gielly L, Miquel C, Valentini A, Vermat T, Corthier G, Brochmann C, Willerslev E. Power and limitations of the chloroplast trnL (UAA) intron for plant DNA barcoding. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35(3):e14.   DOI
22 Ballari SA, Cuevas MF, Ojeda RA, Navarro JL. Diet of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in a protected area of Argentina: the importance of baiting. Mammal Res. 2015;60:81-7.   DOI
23 Barrios-Garcia MN, Ballari SA. Impact of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in its introduced and native range: a review. Biol Invasions. 2012;14(11):2283-300.   DOI
24 Baubet E, Ropert-Coudert Y, Brandt S. Seasonal and annual variations in earthworm consumption by wild boar (Sus scrofa scrofa L.). Wildl Res. 2003;30(2):179-86.   DOI
25 Baubet E, Bonenfant C, Brandt S. Diet of the wild boar in the French alps. Galemys. 2004;16:101-13.
26 Fonseca C. Winter habitat selection by wild boar Sus scrofa in southeastern Poland. Eur J Wildl Res. 2008;54(2):361-6.   DOI
27 Calenge C, Maillard D, Fournier P, Fouque C. Efficiency of spreading maize in the garrigues to reduce wild boar (Sus scrofa) damage to Mediterranean vineyards. Eur J Wildl Res. 2004;50(3):112-20.   DOI
28 Carr CM, Hardy SM, Brown TM, Macdonald TA, Hebert PD. 2011. A trioceanic perspective: DNA barcoding reveals geographic structure and cryptic diversity in Canadian Polychaetes. PLoS One, 2011;6(7):e22232.   DOI
29 Cho IC, Kang SY, Lee SS, Choi YL, Ko MS, Oh MY, Han SH. Molecular sexing using SRY and ZF genes in pigs. J Anim Sci Technol. 2005;47(3):317-24 (in Korean).   DOI
30 Choi TY, Lee YS, Park CH. Home-range of wild boar, Sus scrofa, living in the Jirisan National Park, Korea. J Ecol Environ. 2006;29(3):253-7 (in Korean).
31 Han SH, Oh JG, Cho IC, Ko MS, Kim TW, Chang MH, Kim BS, Park SG, Oh HS. A molecular genetic analysis of the introduced wild boar species (Sus scrofa coreanus) on Mount Halla, Jeju Island, Korea. J Ecol Environ. 2011;25(5):658-65 (in Korean).
32 Herrero J, Garcia-Serrano A, Couto S, Ortuno VM, Garcia-Gonzalez R. 2006. Diet of wild boar Sus scrofa L. and crop damage in an intensive agroecosystem. Eur J Wildl Res 2006;52(4):245-250.   DOI
33 Kierepka EM, Unger SD, Keiter DA, Beasley JC, Rhodes JROE, Cunningham FL, Piaggio AJ. Identification of robust microsatellite markers for wild pig fecal DNA. J Wildl Manag. 2016;80(6):1120-8.   DOI