Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41610-020-0151-2

Role of litter production and its decomposition, and factors affecting the processes in a tropical forest ecosystem: a review  

Giweta, Mekonnen (Ethiopia Environment and Forest Research Institute (EEFRI))
Publication Information
Journal of Ecology and Environment / v.44, no.2, 2020 , pp. 81-89 More about this Journal
Abstract
In the forest ecosystems, litterfall is an important component of the nutrient cycle that regulates the accumulation of soil organic matter (SOM), the input and output of the nutrients, nutrient replenishment, biodiversity conservation, and other ecosystem functions. Therefore, a profound understanding of the major processes (litterfall production and its decomposition rate) in the cycle is vital for sustainable forest management (SFM). Despite these facts, there is still a limited knowledge in tropical forest ecosystems, and further researches are highly needed. This shortfall of research-based knowledge, especially in tropical forest ecosystems, may be a contributing factor to the lack of understanding of the role of plant litter in the forest ecosystem function for sustainable forest management, particularly in the tropical forest landscapes. Therefore, in this paper, I review the role of plant litter in tropical forest ecosystems with the aims of assessing the importance of plant litter in forest ecosystems for the biogeochemical cycle. Then, the major factors that affect the plant litter production and decomposition were identified, which could direct and contribute to future research. The small set of studies reviewed in this paper demonstrated the potential of plant litter to improve the biogeochemical cycle and nutrients in the forest ecosystems. However, further researches are needed particularly on the effect of species, forest structures, seasons, and climate factors on the plant litter production and decomposition in various types of forest ecosystems.
Keywords
Biogeochemical cycle; Ecosystem functions; Litterfall; Litter decomposition; Sustainable forest management; Tropical forest;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Joffre R, Agren GJ, Gillon D, Bosatta E. Organic matter quality in ecological studies: theory meets experiment. Oikos. 2001;93:451-8.   DOI
2 Krishna MP, Mohan M. Litter decomposition in forest ecosystems: a review. Energ Ecol Environ. 2007;2(4):236-49.   DOI
3 Kumar M, Joshi M, Todaria NP. Regeneration status of a sub-tropical Anogeissus latifolia forest in Garhwal Himalaya, India. J For Res. 2010;21(4):439-44.   DOI
4 Laganiere J, Pare D, Bradley RL. How does a tree species influence litter decomposition. Separating the relative contribution of litter quality, litter mixing, and forest door conditions. Can J For Res. 2010;40:465.   DOI
5 Lavelle P, Bignell D, Lepage M, Wolters V, Rogers P, Ineson P, Healow, Dhillion S. Soil functions in a changing world: the role of invertebrate ecosystem engineers. Eur J Soil Biol. 1997;33:159-93.
6 Lira J, Sepp T, Parrest O. The forest structure and ecosystem quality in conditions of anthropogenic disturbance along productivity gradient. For Ecol Manage. 2007;250:34-46.   DOI
7 Liu L. Patterns of litterfall and nutrient return at different altitudes in evergreen hardwood forests of Central Taiwan. Ann. For. Sci. 2012;69(8):877-86.   DOI
8 Magid J, Cadisc G, Giller KE. Short and medium term plant litter decomposition in a tropical Ultisol elucidated by physical fraction in a dual $^{13}C$ and $^{14}C$ isotope study. Soil Biol Biochem. 2002;34:127301281.
9 McCarthy AJ. Lignocellulose-degrading actinomycetes. Federation of Microbiological Societies (FEMS). Microbiol Rev. 1987;46:145-63.
10 Mctiernan KB, Ineson P, Coward PA. Respiration and nutrient release from tree leaf mixtures. Oikos. 1997;78:754.
11 Meentemeyer V. Macroclimate and lignin control of litter decomposition rates. Ecology. 1978;59:465-72.   DOI
12 Coleman DC. and Crossley DA.Fundamental of Soil Ecology. Newyork: Academic Press Inc. 1996;205.
13 Chapman SK, Koch GW. What type of diversity yields synergy during mixed litter decomposition in a natural forest ecosystem? Plant Soil. 2007;299:153-62.   DOI
14 Chaubey OP, Prasad R, Mishra GP. Litter production and nutrient return in teak plantations and adjoining natural forests in Madhya Pradesh. Jour Trop For. 1988;4:242-55.
15 Clark DA, Brown S, Kicklighter DW, Chambers JQ, Thomlinson JR. Measuring net production in forests: concepts and field methods. Ecol Appl. 2001;11:356-70.   DOI
16 Cornwell WK, Cornlissen JHC, Amatangelo K, Dorrrepaal E, Eviner VT, Godoy O, et al. Plant species traits are the predominant control on litter decomposition rates within biomes worldwide. Ecol Lett. 2008;11:1065-71.   DOI
17 De Weirdt M, Verbeeck H, Maignan F, Peylin P, Poluter B, Bonal D, Cias P, Steppe K. Seasonal leaf dynamics for tropical evergreen forests in a process-based global ecosystem model. Geosci Model Dev. 2012;5:1091-108.   DOI
18 Crawford DL. Biodegradation of agricultural and rural wastes. In: Goodfellow M, Williams ST, Mordaski M, editors. Actinomycetes in biotechnology. London:Academic; 1988. p. 433-9.
19 Cuevas E, Lugo AE. Dynamics of organic matter and nutrient return from litterfall in stands of ten tropical tree plantation species. For Ecol Manage. 1998;112:263-79.   DOI
20 Cuevas E, Medina E. Nutrient dynamics within Amazonian forests: part 1, nutrient flux in fine litter fall and efficiency of nutrient utilization. Oecologia. 1986;68:466-72.   DOI
21 Devis AS, Yadava PS. Wood and leaf litter decomposition of Dipterocarpus tuberculatus Roxb. in a tropical deciduous forest of Manipur, North East India. Curr Sci. 2007;93:243-6.
22 Argao LEOC, Malhi Y, Metcalfe DB, Silva-Espejo JE, Jimenez E, Navarrete D, Asquez R. Above- and below-ground net primary productivity across net primary productivity across ten Amazonian forests on contrasting soils. Biogeosci. 2009;6:2759-778.   DOI
23 Akpor OB, Okoh AI, Babalola GO. Culturable microbial population during decomposition of Cola nitida leaf litters in a tropical soil setting. 2006;18(3):313-9.
24 Aravena JC, Carmona MR, Perez CA, Armesto JJ. Changes in tree species richness stand structure and soil properties in a successional chronosequence in northern Chile Island. Chile RevChil Hist Nat. 2002;75:339-60.
25 Andren O, Paustian K. Barely straw decomposition in the field: A comparison of models. Ecology. 1987;68:1190-200.   DOI
26 Berg B, Laskowski R. Litter decomposition: A guide to carbon and nutrient turnover. Adv Ecol Res. 2006;38:448.
27 Qiulu XZ, Xie SC, Liu WY. Studies on the forest ecosystem in Allao Mountains, Yunnan, China. Kumming: Science and Technology Press; 1998.
28 Rawat N, Nautiyal MC. Litter production pattern and nutrients discharge from decomposing litter in Himalayan alpine ecosystem. New York Sci J. 2009;2(6):ISSN 1554-0200.2009.
29 Ruiz-Benito P, Gomez-Aparicio L, Paquette A, et al. Diversity increases carbon storage and tree productivity in Spain forest. Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 2014;23:311-22.   DOI
30 Becker H, Pabst J, Mnyonga J, Kuzyakov Y. Annual litterfall dynamics and nutrient deposition depending on elevation and land use at Mt. Kilimanjaro. Biogeosci Discuss. 2015;2:10031-57.
31 Brady NC, Weil RR. The nature and properties of soils. Pearson prentice hall, upper saddle river. NY. 2010.
32 Bray JR, Gorham E. Litter production in forests of the world. Adv Ecol Res. 1964;2:101-57.   DOI
33 Brown GG. How do earthworms affect microfloral and faunal community diversity? Plant Soil. 1995;170:209-31.   DOI
34 Cadish G, Giller KE. Driven by nature: plant litter quality and decomposition. Wallingford: CAB International; 1997.
35 Dilly O, Bloem J, Vos A, Munch JC. Bacterial diversity in agricultural soils during litter decomposition. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004;70:468-74.   DOI
36 Franklin J, Spies TA, Pelt RV, Carey AB, Thornburgh DA, Berg DR, et al. Disturbance and structural development of natural forest ecosystems with silvicultural implications, using Douglas-fir forests as an example. For Ecol Manage. 2002;155:399-423.   DOI
37 Gartner TB, Cardon ZG. Decomposition dynamics in mixed-species leaf litter a review. Oikos. 2004;104:230.   DOI
38 Gartner TB, Cardon ZG. Site of leaf origin affects how mixed litter decomposes. Soil Biol Biochem. 2006;38(8):2307-17.   DOI
39 Schaefer M and Schauermann J. The soil fauna of beech forests: Comparison between a mull and a modern soil. Pedobiologia. 1990;34(5):299-314.
40 Sariyildiz T. Effects of gap-size classes on long-term litter decomposition rates of beech, oak and chestnut species at high elevations in Northeast Turkey. Ecosystems. 2008;11:841.   DOI
41 Scheer MB. Nutrient flow in rainfall and throughfall in two stretches in an Atlantic Rain Forest in southern Brazil (in Portuguese). Floresta. 2009;39:117-30.   DOI
42 Schinner F. Introduction. In: Schinner F, Ohlinger R, Kandeler E, Margesin R, editors. Methods in soil biology. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1996. p. 3-6.
43 Seta T, Zerihun W. Litterfall dynamics in Boter-Becho forest: moist evergreen montane forests of southwestern Ethiopia. J Ecol Nat Environ. 2018;10(1):13-21.   DOI
44 Sundarapandian SM, Swamy PS. Litter production and leaf litter decomposition of selected tree species in tropical forests at Kodayar in the Western Ghats, India. For Ecol Manage. 1999;123:231-44.   DOI
45 Swift MJ, Heal OW, Anderson JM. Decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1979.
46 Szanser M, Ilieva-Makulec K, Kajak A, et al. Impact of litter species diversity on decomposition processes and communities of soil organisms. Soil Biol Biochem. 2001;43:9-19.   DOI
47 Taylor BR, Parkinson D, Parsons WFJ. Nitrogen and lignin content as predictors of litter decay rates: a microcosm test. Ecology. 1989;70:97.   DOI
48 Tripathi OP, Pandey HN, Tripathi RS. Litter production, decomposition and physicchemical properties of soil in 3 developed agroforestry systems of Meghalaya, Northeast India. Afr J Plant Sci. 2009;3(8):160-7.
49 Gillon D, Joffre R, Ibrahim A. Initial litter properties and decay rate: a microcosm experiment on Mediterranean species. Can J Bot. 1993;72:946-54.   DOI
50 Giebelmann UC, Martins KG, Brandle M, Schadler M, Marques R, Brandl R. Lack of home-field advantage in the decomposition of leaf litter in the Atlantic rainforest of Brazil. Appl Soil Ecol. 2013;8:1.   DOI
51 Gonzalez G, Ley RE, Schmidt SK, Zou X, Seastedt TR. Soil ecological interactions: comparison between tropical and subalpine forests. Oceologia. 2001;128:549-56.   DOI
52 Gonzalez G, Zou X. Earthworm influence on N availability and the growth of Cecropla scheberiana in tropical pasture and forest soils. Pedobiologia. 1999;43:824-9.
53 Gonzalez ME, Veblen TT, Siblod JS. Fire history of Arucaria-Nothofagus forests in Villarrica National Park, Chile. J Biogeogr. 2005;32:1187-202.   DOI
54 Hattenschwiler S, Jorgensen HB. Carbon quality rather than stoichiometry controls litter decomposition in a tropical rain forest. J Ecol. 2010;98:754.   DOI
55 Hayes GF, Holl KD. Cattle grazing impacts on annual forbs and vegetation composition of mesic grasslands in California. Conserv Biol. 2003;17:1694-702.   DOI
56 Wedin DA, Tieszen LL, Deway B, Pastor J. Carbon isotope dynamics during grass decomposition and soil organic matter formation. Ecology. 1995;76:1383-92.   DOI
57 Veen GF, Sundqvist MA, Wardle DA. Environmental factors and traits that drive plant litter decomposition do not determine home-field advantage effects. Funct Ecol. 2015;29:981-91.   DOI
58 Vitousek P. Nutrient cycling and nutrient use efficiency. Am Nat. 1982;119:553-72.   DOI
59 Vivanco L, Austin AT. Tree species identity alters forest litter decomposition through long-term plant and soil interaction in Patagonia, Argentina. J Ecol. 2008;96:727-36.   DOI
60 Wiebe KL. Responses of cavity-nesting birds to fire: testing a general model with data from the northern flicker. Ecology. 2014;95:2537-47.   DOI
61 Zhang H, Yuan W, Liu S. Seasonal patterns of litterfall in forest ecosystem worldwide. Ecol Complexity. 2014;20:240-7.   DOI
62 Vitousek P, Sanford RL. Nutrient cycling in tropical forest. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 1986;17:137-67.   DOI
63 Perez-Harguindeguy N, Diaz S, Cornelissen JHC, Venramini F, Cabido M, Castellanos A. Chemistry and toughness predict leaf litter decomposition rates over a wide spectrum of functional types and taxa in Central Argentina. Plant Soil. 2000;218:21-30.   DOI
64 Melo MA, Budke JC, Henke-Oliveira C. Relationships between structure of the tree component and environment variables in a subtropical seasonal forest in the upper Uragay River Valley, Brazil. Acta Bot Bras. 2013;27:751-60.   DOI
65 Mishra BP, Tripathi OP, Tripathi RS, Pandey HN. Effects of anthropogenic disturbance on plant diversity and community structure of a sacred grove in Meghalaya, north east India. Biodivers Conserv. 2004;13:421-36.   DOI
66 Olson JS. Energy storage and the balance of production and decomposition in ecological systems. Ecology. 1963;44:323-31.   DOI
67 Pant SC, Tiwari SC. Litter fall and litter decomposition in a montane oak forest of Garhwal Himalaya. Trop Ecol. 1992;33(1):103-9.
68 Parsons SA, Valdez-Ramirez V, Congdon RA, Williams SE. Contrasting patterns of litterfall seasonality and seasonal changes in litter decomposability in a tropical rainforest region. Biogeosciences. 2014;11:5047-56.   DOI
69 Perez-Suarez M, Arredondo-moreno T, Huber-Sannwald E. Early stage of single and mixed leaf-litter decomposition in semiarid forest pine-oak: the role of rainfall and microsite. Biogeochemistry. 2012;108:245.   DOI
70 Perez-Suarez M, Arredondo-Moreno JT, Huber-Sannwald E, Vargas-Hernandez, JJ. Production and quality of senesced and green litterfall in a pineoak forest in central-northwest Mexico. For Ecol Manage. 2009;258:1307-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.06.031.   DOI
71 Prescott CE. Do rates of litter decomposition tell us anything we really need to know? For Ecol Manage. 2005;220:66.   DOI