Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41610-020-00159-6

Habitat selection in the lesser cuckoo, an avian brood parasite breeding on Jeju Island, Korea  

Yun, Seongho (Korea Institute of Ornithology, Kyung Hee University)
Lee, Jin-Won (Korea Institute of Ornithology, Kyung Hee University)
Yoo, Jeong-Chil (Korea Institute of Ornithology, Kyung Hee University)
Publication Information
Journal of Ecology and Environment / v.44, no.2, 2020 , pp. 106-114 More about this Journal
Abstract
Background: Determining patterns of habitat use is key to understanding of animal ecology. Approximately 1% of bird species use brood parasitism for their breeding strategy, in which they exploit other species' (hosts) parental care by laying eggs in their nests. Brood parasitism may complicate the habitat requirement of brood parasites because they need habitats that support both their host and their own conditions for breeding. Brood parasitism, through changes in reproductive roles of sex or individual, may further diversify habitat use patterns among individuals. However, patterns of habitat use in avian brood parasites have rarely been characterized. In this study, we categorized the habitat preference of a population of brood parasitic lesser cuckoos (Cuculus poliocephalus) breeding on Jeju Island, Korea. By using compositional analyses together with radio-tracking and land cover data, we determined patterns of habitat use and their sexual and diurnal differences. Results: We found that the lesser cuckoo had a relatively large home range and its overall habitat composition (the second-order selection) was similar to those of the study area; open areas such as the field and grassland habitats accounted for 80% of the home range. Nonetheless, their habitat, comprised of 2.54 different habitats per hectare, could be characterized as a mosaic. We also found sexual differences in habitat composition and selection in the core-use area of home ranges (third-order selection). In particular, the forest habitat was preferentially utilized by females, while underutilized by males. However, there was no diurnal change in the pattern of habitat use. Both sexes preferred field habitats at the second-order selection. At the third-order selection, males preferred field habitats followed by grasslands and females preferred grasslands followed by forest habitats. Conclusions: We suggest that the field and grassland habitats represent the two most important areas for the lesser cuckoo on Jeju Island. Nevertheless, this study shows that habitat preference may differ between sexes, likely due to differences in sex roles, sex-based energy demands, and potential sexual conflict.
Keywords
Core-use area; Habitat composition; Habitat preference; Home range; Radio-tracking; Sexual difference;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Rettie WJ, McLoughlin PD. Overcoming radiotelemetry bias in habitat-selection studies. Can J Zool. 1999;77:1175-84.   DOI
2 Roelke DL, Sogard SM. Gender-based differences in habitat selection and activity level in the northern pipefish (Syngnathus fuscus). Copeia. 1993;1993:528-32.   DOI
3 Rothstein SI, Verner J, Steven E. Radio-tracking confirms a unique diurnal pattern of spatial occurrence in the parasitic brown-headed cowbird. Ecology. 1984;65:77-88.   DOI
4 Scardamaglia RC, Reboreda JC. Ranging behavior of female and male shiny cowbirds and screaming cowbirds while searching for host nests. Auk. 2014;131:610-8.   DOI
5 Seaman DE, Millspaugh JJ, Kernohan BJ, Brundige GC, Raedeke KJ, Gitzen RA. Effects of sample size on kernel home range estimates. J Wildl Manag. 1999:739-47.
6 Bon R, Campan R. Unexplained sexual segregation in polygamous ungulates: a defense of an ontogenetic approach. Behav Process. 1996;38:131-54.   DOI
7 Bozek CK, Prange S, Gehrt SD. The influence of anthropogenic resources on multi-scale habitat selection by raccoons. Urban Ecosyst. 2007;10:413-25.   DOI
8 Brown JS. Patch use as an indicator of habitat preference, predation risk, and competition. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 1988;22:37-47.   DOI
9 Chapman T, Arnqvist G, Bangham J, Rowe L. Sexual conflict. Trends Ecol Evol. 2003;18:41-7.   DOI
10 Cody ML. Habitat selection in birds. Califonia: Academic Press; 1985.
11 Crawley MJ. The R book. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons; 2012.
12 Croston R, Hauber ME. The ecology of avian brood parasitism. Nat Educ Knowledge. 2010;1:3.
13 Darden SK, Croft DP. Male harassment drives females to alter habitat use and leads to segregation of the sexes. Biol Lett. 2008;4:449-51.   DOI
14 Aebischer NJ, Robertson PA, Kenward RE. Compositional analysis of habitat use from animal radio-tracking data. Ecology. 1993;74:1313-25.   DOI
15 Bingham RL, Brennan LA. Comparison of type I error rates for statistical analyses of resource selection. J Wildl Manag. 2004;68:206-12.   DOI
16 Dickson BG, Beier P. Home-range and habitat selection by adult cougars in southern California. J Wildl Manag. 2002;66:1235-45.   DOI
17 Ersts PJ, Rosenbaum HC. Habitat preference reflects social organization of humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) on a wintering ground. J Zool. 2003;260:337-45.   DOI
18 Freeman S, Jackson WM. Univariate metrics are not adequate to measure avian body size. Auk. 1990;107:69-74.
19 Godet L, Marquet M, Eybert M-C, Gregoire E, Monnet S, Fournier J. Bluethroats Luscinia svecica namnetum offset landscape constraints by expanding their home range. J Ornithol. 2015;156:591-600.   DOI
20 Sykes PW, Carpenter JW, Holzman S, Geissler PH. Evaluation of three miniature radio transmitter attachment methods for small passerines. Wildl Soc Bull. 1990;18:41-8.
21 Todorov V, Filzmoser P. An object-oriented framework for robust multivariate analysis. J Stat Softw. 2009;32:1-47.
22 Trivers RL. Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B, editor. Sexual selection and the descent of man. Chicago: Aldine; 1972. p. 136-79.
23 Herve M. RVAideMemoire: testing and plotting procedures for biostatistics. R package version 0.9-73. 2019. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=RVAideMemoire. Accessed 23 Dec 2019.
24 Hamao S. Japanese Bush Warbler. Bird Res News. 2014;4:3-4.
25 Hamao S, Hayama M. Breeding ecology of the Japanese Bush Warbler in the Ogasawara Islands. Ornithol Sci. 2015;14:111-5.   DOI
26 Hauber ME, Dearborn DC. Parentage without parental care: what to look for in genetic studies of obligate brood-parasitic mating systems. Auk. 2003;120:1-13.   DOI
27 Ishizawa J, Chiba S. Food analysis of four species of cuckoos in Japan. J YIO. 1966;4:302-26.
28 Jakimchuk RD, Ferguson SH, Sopuck LG. Differential habitat use and sexual segregation in the Central Arctic caribou herd. Can J Zool. 1987;65:534-41.   DOI
29 Janke AK, Gates RJ. Home range and habitat selection of northern bobwhite coveys in an agricultural landscape. J Wildl Manag. 2013;77:405-13.   DOI
30 Vogl W, Taborsky M, Taborsky B, Teuschl Y, Honza M. Cuckoo females preferentially use specific habitats when searching for host nests. Anim Behav. 2002;64:843-50.   DOI
31 Vogl W, Taborsky B, Taborsky M, Teuschl Y, Honza M. Habitat and space use of European cuckoo females during the egg laying period. Behaviour. 2004;141:881-98.   DOI
32 Ward S. Energy expenditure of female barn swallows Hirundo rustica during egg formation. Physiol Zool. 1996;69:930-51.   DOI
33 Yoo S, Kim H-N, Lee J-W, Yoo J-C. Seasonal and diurnal patterns of population vocal activity in avian brood parasites. Ibis. 2020: doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.12741.
34 Yun S, Kim H, Moon H-K, Lee J-W, Yoo J-C. Home range overlap and its genetic correlates in an avian brood parasite, the lesser cuckoo Cuculus poliocephalus. J Ethol. 2019;37:271-81.   DOI
35 Jirotkul M. Population density influences male-male competition in guppies. Anim Behav. 1999;58:1169-75.   DOI
36 Johnson DH. The comparison of usage and availability measurements for evaluating resource preference. Ecology. 1980;61:65-71.   DOI
37 Langmore NE, Adcock GJ, Kilner RM. The spatial organization and mating system of Horsfield's bronze-cuckoos, Chalcites basalis. Anim Behav. 2007;74:403-12.   DOI
38 Lee J-W. Searching for hosts of avian brood parasites breeding in Korea. Korean J Ornithol. 2014;21:25-37.
39 Lee J-W, Kim H-N, Yoo S, Yoo J-C. Common cuckoo females may escape male sexual harassment by color polymorphism. Sci Rep. 2019;9:7515.   DOI
40 Martin AR, da Silva VMF. River dolphins and flooded forest: seasonal habitat use and sexual segregation of botos (Inia geoffrensis) in an extreme cetacean environment. J Zool. 2004;263:295-305.   DOI
41 Nakamura H, Miyazawa Y, Kashiwagi K. Behavior of radio-tracked common cuckoo females during the breeding season in Japan. Ornithol Sci. 2005;4:31-41.   DOI
42 Mohr CO. Table of equivalent populations of North American small mammals. Am Midl Nat. 1947;37:223-49.   DOI
43 Mysterud A. The relationship between ecological segregation and sexual body size dimorphism in large herbivores. Oecologia. 2000;124:40-54.   DOI
44 Nakamura H, Miyazawa Y. Movements, space use and social organization of radio-tracked common cuckoos during the breeeding season in Japan. Jpn J Ornithol. 1997;46:23-54.   DOI
45 Ornat AL, Greenberg R. Sexual segregation by habitat in migratory warblers in Quintana Roo, Mexico. Auk. 1990;107:539-43.
46 Payne RB. The cuckoos. New York: Oxford University Press; 2005.
47 Pulliam HR, Danielson BJ. Sources, sinks, and habitat selection: a landscape perspective on population dynamics. Am Nat. 1991;137:S50-66.   DOI
48 R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2017.