Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5141/ecoenv.2015.054

Decomposition of leaf litter of some evergreen broadleaf trees in Korea  

Lee, Kyung Eui (Department of Life Science, Chung-Ang University)
Cha, Sangsub (Department of Life Science, Chung-Ang University)
Lee, Sang Hoon (Department of Life Science, Chung-Ang University)
Shim, Jae Kuk (Department of Life Science, Chung-Ang University)
Publication Information
Journal of Ecology and Environment / v.38, no.4, 2015 , pp. 517-528 More about this Journal
Abstract
Litter decomposition is an important process in terrestrial ecosystem. However, studies on decomposition are rare, especially in evergreen broadleaf trees. We collected the leaf litter of five evergreen broadleaf trees (Daphniphyllum macropodum, Dendropanax morbifera, Castanopsis cuspidata var. thunbergii, Machilus thunbergii and Quercus acuta), and carried out a decomposition experiment using the litterbag method in Ju-do, Wando-gun, Korea for 731 days from December 25, 2011 to December 25, 2013. Among the five experimental tree species, C. cuspidata var. thunbergii distribution was limited in Jeju Island, and D. macropodum was distributed at the highest latitude at Mt. Baekyang (N 35°40′). About 2% of the initial litter mass of D. macropodum and D. morbifera remained, while 20.9% remained for C. cuspidata var. thunbergii, 30.4% for M. thunbergii, and 31.6% for Q. acuta. D. macropodum litter decayed four times faster (k = 2.02 yr-1) than the litter of Q. acuta (k = 0.58 yr-1). The decomposition of litter was positively influenced by thermal climate such as accumulated mean daily air temperature (year day index) and precipitation, as well as by physical characteristics such as thickness (R2=0.939, P = 0.007) and specific leaf area (SLA) (R2 = 0.964, P = 0.003). The characteristics of chemical composition such as lignin (R2 = 0.939, P = 0.007) and water-soluble materials (R2 = 0.898, P = 0.014) showed significant correlations with litter decomposition. However, the nutrients in litter showed complicated species-specific trends. The litter of D. macropodum and D. morbifera had fast decomposition despite their low nitrogen concentration and high C/N ratio. This means that the litter decomposition was more strongly affected by physical characteristics than chemical composition and nutrient content. On the other hand, the litter of Q. acuta which had the slowest decay rate had a high amount of N and low C/N ratio. Thus, the decomposition of Q. acuta litter was more affected by the P content of the litter than the N content, although all litter had similar physical characteristics.
Keywords
decomposition; decomposition constant; evergreen broadleaf; leaf litter; physico-chemical effects;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Aerts R, Chapin FS III. 2000. The mineral nutrition of wild plants revisited: a re-evaluation of processes and patterns. Adv Ecol Res 30: 1-67.
2 Aerts R, De Caluwe H. 1997. Nutritional and plant mediated controls on leaf litter decomposition of Carex species. Ecology 78: 244-260.   DOI
3 Allen SE, Grimshaw HM, Parkinson JA, Quarmby CL. 1974. Chemical analysis of ecological materials. Blackwell Scientific Publications, London, pp 245-247.
4 Austin AT, Vitousek PM. 1998. Nutrient dynamics on a precipitation gradient in Hawai’i. Oecologia 113: 519- 529.   DOI
5 Austin AT, Vivanco L. 2006. Plant litter decomposition in a semi-arid ecosystem controlled by photodegradation. Nature 442: 555-558.   DOI
6 Chang NK, Han SE. 1985. A study on the production and decomposition of litters of evergreen broadleaved forests in Haenam and Koje-do. Korean J Ecol 8: 163-169.
7 Berg B, Berg MP, Bottner P, Box E, Breymeyer A, de Anta RC, Couteaux M, Escudero A, Gallardo A, Kratz W, Madeira M, Mälkönen E, Mcclaugherty C, Meentemeyer V, Muñoz F, Piussi P, Remacle J, De Santo AV. 1993. Litter mass loss rates in pine forests of Europe and Eastern United States: some relationships with climate and litter quality. Biogeochemistry 20: 127-159.   DOI
8 Berg B, Lundmark JE. 1987. Decomposition of needle litter in lodgepole pine and Scots pine monocultural systems – A comparison. Scand J For Res 2: 3-12.   DOI
9 Bollen WB. 1953. Mulches and soil conditioners, Carbon and nitrogen in farm and forest products. J Agric Food Chem 7: 379-381.   DOI
10 Chen X, Wei X, Scherer R. 2005. Influence of wildfire and harvest on biomass, carbon pool, and decomposition of large woody debris in forested streams of southern interior British Columbia. For Ecol Manag 208: 101-114.   DOI
11 Cotrufo MF, Briones MJI, Ineson P. 1998. Elevated CO2 affects field decomposition rate and palatability of tree leaf litter: Importance of changes in substrate quality. Soil Biol Biochem 30: 1565-1571.   DOI
12 Coûteaux MM, Bottner P, Berg B. 1995. Litter decomposition, climate and litter quality. Trends Ecol Evol 10: 63-66.   DOI
13 Cunha-Santino MBD, Pacobahyba LD, Bianchini Jr I. 2003. Changes in the amount of soluble carbohydrates and polyphenols contents during decomposition of Montrichardia arborescens (L.) Schott. Acta Amazonica 33: 469-476.   DOI
14 Garrett LG, Kimberley MO, Oliver GR, Pearce SH, Beets PN. 2012. Decomposition of coarse woody roots and branches in managed Pinus radiata plantations in New Zealand – A time series approach. For Ecol Manag 269: 116-123.   DOI
15 Fioretto A, Di Nardo C, Papa S, Fuggi A. 2005. Lignin and cellulose degradation and nitrogen dynamics during decomposition of three leaf litter species in a Mediterranean ecosystem. Soil Biol Biochem 37: 1083-1091.   DOI
16 Fogel R, Cromack Jr K. 1977. Effect of habitat and substrate quality on Douglas fir litter decomposition in western Oregon. Can J Bot 55: 1632-1640.   DOI
17 Heal OW, Anderson JM, Swift MJ. 1997. Plant litter quality and decomposition: an historical overview. In:Driven by Nature: Plant Litter Quality and Decomposition (Cadisch G, Giller KE, eds). CAB International, Wallingford, pp 3-32.
18 Gallardo A, Merino J. 1992. Nitrogen immobilization in leaf litter at two Mediterranean ecosystems of SW Spain. Biogeochemistry 15: 213-228.   DOI
19 Gessner MO. 1991. Differences in processing dynamics of fresh and dried leaf litter in a stream ecosytem. Freshw Biol 26: 387-398.   DOI
20 Han YS. 2014. A study on carbon distribution and budget of dominant plant community in Gotjawal, Jeju Island. MS Thesis. Kongju University, Gongju, South Korea.
21 Helrich KC. 1990. Official methods of Analysis of the AOAC Association of Official Analytical Chemists Inc. Arlington, VA.
22 Hobbie SE. 1996. Temperature and plants species control over litter decomposition in Alaskan tundra. Ecol Monogr 66: 503-522.   DOI
23 Klotzbücher T, Kaiser K, Guggenberger G, Gatzek C, Kalbitz K. 2011. A new conceptual model for the fate of lignin in decomposing plant litter. Ecology 92: 1052-1062.   DOI
24 Koukoura Z, Mamolos AP, Kalburtji KL. 2003. Decomposition of dominant plant species litter in a semi-arid grassland. Appl Soil Ecol 23: 13-23.   DOI
25 Lamlom SH, Savidge RA. 2003. A reassessment of carbon content in wood: variation within and between 41 North American species. Biomass Bioenergy 25: 381-388.   DOI
26 Lim SM, Cha SS, Shim JK. 2011. Effects of simulated acid rain on microbial activities and litter decomposition. J Ecol Field Biol 34: 401-410.   DOI
27 Moretto AS, Distel RA, Didoné NG. 2001. Decomposition and nutrient dynamic of leaf litter and roots from palatable and unpalatable grasses in a semi-arid grassland. Appl Soil Ecol 18: 31-37.   DOI
28 Meentemeyer V. 1978. Macroclimate and lignin control of litter decomposition rates. Ecology 59: 465-472.   DOI
29 Melillo JM, Aber JD, Muratore JF. 1982. Nitrogen and lignin control of hardwood leaf litter decomposition dynamics. Ecology 63: 621-626.   DOI
30 Millar CS. 1974. Decomposition of coniferous leaf litter. In:Biology of plant litter decomposition. (Dickinson C H, Pugh G J F, eds). Academic press, London and New York, pp 105-128.
31 Olson JS. 1963. Energy Storage and the Balance of Producers and Decomposers in Ecological Systems. Ecology 44: 322-331.   DOI
32 Polyakova O, Billor N. 2007. Impact of deciduous tree species on litterfall quality, decomposition rates and nutrient circulation in pine stands. For Ecol Manage 253: 11-18.   DOI
33 Ribeiro C, Madeira M, Arau´jo MC. 2002. Decomposition and nutrient release from leaf litter of Eucalyptus globules grown under different water and nutrient regimes. For Ecol Manag 171: 31-41.   DOI
34 Silver WL, Miya RK. 2001. Global patterns in root decomposition: comparisons of climate and litter quality effects. Oecologia 129: 407-419.   DOI
35 Rowland AP, Roberts JD. 1994. Lignin and cellulose fractionation in decomposition studies using acid-detergent fibre methods. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 25: 269-277.   DOI
36 Sariyildiz T, Anderson JM. 2003. Interactions between litter quality, decomposition and soil fertility: a laboratory study. Soil Biol Biochem 35: 391-399.   DOI
37 Swift MJ, Heal OW, Anderson JM. 1979. Decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems. University of California Press, Oakland, CA.
38 Saura-Mas S, Estiarte M, Penuelas J, Lloret F. 2012. Effects of climate change on leaf litter decomposition across post-fire plant regenerative groups. Environ Exp Bot 77: 274-282.   DOI
39 Singh KP, Singh PK, Tripathi SK. 1999. Litterfall, litter decomposition and nutrient release patterns in four native tree species raised on coal mine spoil at Singrauli, India. Biol Fertil Soils 29: 371-378.   DOI
40 Sundarapandian SM, Swamy PS. 1999. Litter production and leaf-litter decomposition of selected tree species in tropical forests at Kodayar in Western Ghats, India. For Ecol Manag 123: 231-244.   DOI
41 Tateno R, Tokuchi N, Yamanaka N, Du S, Otsuki K, Shimamura T, Xue Z, Wang S, Hou Q. 2007. Comparison of litterfall production and leaf litter decomposition between an exotic black locust plantation and an indigenous oak forest near Yan’an on the Loess Plateau, China. Forest Ecol Manage 241: 84–90.   DOI
42 Van Vuuren MMI, Berendse F, De Visser W. 1993. Species and site differences in the decomposition of litters and roots from wet heathlands. Can J Bot 71: 167-173.   DOI
43 Vitousek PM, Turner DR, Parton WJ, Sanford RL. 1994. Litter decomposition on the Mauna Loa environmental matrix, Hawai’i: patterns, mechanisms, and models. Ecology 75: 418-429.   DOI
44 Wang Q, Wang S, Huang Y. 2008. Comparisons of litterfall, litter decomposition and nutrient return in a monoculture Cunninghamia lanceolata and a mixed stand in southern China. For Ecol Manag 255: 1210–1218.   DOI
45 Yang KC. 1995. Studies on litter decomposition and nutrient release in some three spacies. MS Thesis. Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea.
46 Wieder WR, Cleveland CC, Townsend AR. 2009. Controls over leaf litter decomposition in wet tropical forests. Ecology 90: 3333-3341.   DOI
47 Won HY, Kim DK, Lee KJ, Park SB, Choi JS, Mun HT. 2014. Long term decomposition and nutrients dynamics of Quercus mongolica and Pinus densiflora leaf litter in Mt. Worak National Park. Korean J Environ Ecol 28: 566-573.   DOI
48 Yang FF, Li YL, Zhou GY, Wenigmann KO, Zhang DQ, Wenigmann M, Liu SZ, Zhang QM. 2010. Dynamics of coarse woody debris and decomposition rates in an old-growth forest in lower tropical China. For Ecol Manag 259: 1666-1672.   DOI
49 Yim YJ, Kira T. 1975. Distribution of forest vegetation and climate in the Korea peninsula; I. Distribution of some indices of thermal climate. Jap J Ecol 25: 77-88.
50 Yim YJ, Lee WC. 1976. On the vegetations of Judo and Gamagseum. J Plant Biol 19: 49-61.
51 Zimmer M. 2002. Is decomposition of woodland leaf litter influenced by its species richness?. Soil Biol Biochem 34: 277-284.   DOI