Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5141/JEFB.2008.31.3.233

Evaluation of Environmental Factors to Determine the Distribution of Functional Feeding Groups of Benthic Macroinvertebrates Using an Artificial Neural Network  

Park, Young-Seuk (Department of Biology and Institute of Global Environment, Kyung Hee University)
Lek, Sovan (EDB (Laboratoire Evolution Diversite Biologique), UMR 5174, CNRS - Universite Paul Sabatier)
Chon, Tae-Soo (Department of Biology, Pusan National University)
Verdonschot, Piet F.M. (Alterra, Green World Research, Department of Freshwater Ecosystems)
Publication Information
Journal of Ecology and Environment / v.31, no.3, 2008 , pp. 233-241 More about this Journal
Abstract
Functional feeding groups (FFGs) of benthic macroinvertebrates are guilds of invertebrate taxa that obtain food in similar ways, regardless of their taxonomic affinities. They can represent a heterogeneous assemblage of benthic fauna and may indicate disturbances of their habitats. The proportion of different groups can change in response to disturbances that affect the food base of the system, thereby offering a means of assessing disruption of ecosystem functioning. In this study, we used benthic macroinvertebrate communities collected at 650 sites of 23 different water types in the province of Overijssel, The Netherlands. Physical and chemical environmental factors were measured at each sampling site. Each taxon was assigned to its corresponding FFG based on its food resources. A multilayer perceptron (MLP) using a backpropagation algorithm, a supervised artificial neural network, was applied to evaluate the influence of environmental variables to the FFGs of benthic macroinvertebrates through a sensitivity analysis. In the evaluation of input variables, the sensitivity analysis with partial derivatives demonstrates the relative importance of influential environmental variables on the FFG, showing that different variables influence the FFG in various ways. Collector-filterers and shredders were mainly influenced by $Ca^{2+}$ and width of the streams, and scrapers were influenced mostly with $Ca^{2+}$ and depth, and predators were by depth and pH. $Ca^{2+}$ and depth displayed relatively high influence on all four FFGs, while some variables such as pH, %gravel, %silt, and %bank affected specific groups. This approach can help to characterize community structure and to ecologically assess target ecosystems.
Keywords
Artificial neural network; Benthic macroinvertebrates; Contribution evaluation; Functional feeding groups; Prediction; Sensitivity analysis;
Citations & Related Records

Times Cited By SCOPUS : 0
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Callisto M, Moreno P, Barbosa FAR. 2001. Habitat diversity and benthic functional trophic groups at Serra Do Cipo, Southeast Brazil. Rev Brasil Biol 61(2): 259-266   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Chon T-S, Park Y-S, Kim J-M, Lee B-Y, Chung Y-J, Kim Y. 2000. Use of an artificial neural network to predict population dynamics of the forest-pest pine needle gall midge (Diptera: Cecidomyiida). Environ Entomol 29: 1208-1215   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Cummins KW, Klug MJ. 1979. Feeding ecology of stream invertebrates. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 10: 147-172   DOI
4 Dimopoulos I, Chronopoulos J, Chronopoulos-Sereli A, Lek S. 1999. Neural network models to study relationships between lead concentration in grasses and permanent urban descriptors in Athens city (Greece). Ecol Model 120: 157-165   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Dimopoulos Y, Bourret P, Lek S. 1995. Use of some sensitivity criteria for choosing networks with good generalisation ability. Neural Process Lett 2: 1-4
6 Garson GD. 1991. Interpreting neural network connection weights. Artificial Intel Expert 6: 47-51
7 Hawkins CP, Norris RH, Gerritsen J, Hughes RM, Jackson SK, Johnson RK, Stevenson RJ. 2000. Evaluation of the use of landscape classifications for the prediction of freshwater biota: synthesis and recommendations. J N Am Benthol Soc 19: 541-556   DOI   ScienceOn
8 MacArthur RH. 1965. Patterns of species diversity. Biol Rev 40: 510- 533   DOI
9 Lenat DR. 1988. Water quality assessment of streams using a qualitative collection method for benthic macroinvertebrates. J N Am Benthol Soc 7: 222-233   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Levin SA. 1992. The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology 73: 1943-1967   DOI   ScienceOn
11 TNRCC 1999. Receiving Water Assessment Procedures Manual. Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission, Austin TX
12 Turner MG, Gardner RH. 1991. Quantitative Methods in Landscape Ecology: The Analysis and Interpretation of Landscape Heterogeneity. Springer-Verlag, New York
13 Skelton PH, Cambray JA, Lombard A, Benn GA. 1995. Patterns of distribution and conservation status of freshwater fishes in South Africa. South Africa J Zool 30: 71-81   DOI
14 Ward JV, Stanford JA. 1983. The serial discontinuity concept of lotic ecosystems. In: Dynamics of Lotic Ecosystems (Fontaine TD, Bartell SM, eds). Ann Arbor Sci, Michigan, pp 29-42
15 Wallace JB, Webster JR, Woodall WR. 1977. The role of filter feeders in flowing waters
16 Ward JV, Stanford JA. 1979. Ecological factors controlling stream zoobenthos with emphasis on thermal modification of regulated streams. In: The Ecology of Regulated Streams (Ward JV, Stanford JA, eds). Plenum Press, New York, pp 35-55
17 Allan JD, Castillo MM. 2007. Stream Ecology: Structure and Function of Running Waters. Springer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands
18 Allan JD. 1982. Feeding habits and prey consumption of three setipalpian stoneflies (Plecoptera) in a mountain stream. Ecology 63: 26-34   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Balls G-R, Palmer Brown D, Sanders G-E. 1996. Investigating microclimatic influences on ozone injury in clover (Trifolium subterraneum) using artificial neural networks. New Phytologist 132: 271- 280   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Barbour MT, Gerritsen J, Snyder BD, Stribling JB. 1999. Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Streams and Wadeable Rivers: Periphyton, Benthic Macroinvertebrates and Fish, Second Edition. EPA 841-B-99-002. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Office of Water; Washington, D.C
21 Resh VH, Jackson JK. 1993. Rapid assessment approaches to biomonitoring using benthic macroinvertebrates. In: Freshwater Biomonitoring and Benthic Macroinvertebrates (Rosenberg DM, Resh VH, eds). Chapman & Hall, New York. pp 195-233
22 Rosenberg DM, Resh VH (eds). 1993. Freshwater Biomonitoring and Benthic Invertebrates. Chapman and Hall, New York
23 Paruelo JM, Tomasel F. 1997. Prediction of functional characteristics of ecosystems: a comparison of artificial neural networks and regression models. Ecol Model 98: 173-186   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Park Y-S, Rabinovich J, Lek S. 2007. Sensitivity analysis and stability patterns of two-species pest models using artificial neural networks. Ecol Model 204: 427-438   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Olden JD, Jackson DA. 2002. Illuminating the 'black box': understanding variable contributions in artificial neural networks. Ecol Model 154: 135-150   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Olden JD, Joy MK, Death RG. 2004. An accurate comparison of methods for quantifying variable importance in artificial neural networks using simulated data. Ecol Model 178: 389-397   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Olden JD. 2003. A species-specific approach to modelling biological communities and its potential for conservation. Conserv Biol 17: 854-863   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Park Y-S, Chon T-S. 2007. Biologically-inspired machine learning implemented to ecological informatics. Ecol Model 203: 1-7   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Maier HR, Dandy GC. 1996. The use of artificial neural networks for the prediction of water quality parameters. Water Resour Res 32: 1013-1022   DOI
30 McCallum H. 2000. Population Parameters. Estimation for Ecological Models. Blackwell Science, Oxford
31 Liong SY, Lim WH, Paudyal GN. 2000. River stage forecasting in Bangladesh: neural network approach. J. Comput. Civil Eng 14: 1-8   DOI   ScienceOn
32 Hershey AE, Hitner AL, Hullar MAJ, Miller MC, Vestal JR, Lock MA, Rundle S, Peterson BJ. 1988. Nutrient influence on a stream grazer: orthocladius microcommunities respond to nutrient input. Ecology 69: 1383-1392   DOI   ScienceOn
33 Hart DD, Robinson CT. 1990. Resource limitation in a stream community: Phosphorous enrichment effects on periphyton and grazers. Ecology 71: 1494-1502   DOI   ScienceOn
34 Haykin S. 1994. Neural Networks. MacMillian College Publishing Company, New York
35 Hellawell JM. 1978. Biological Surveillance of Rivers. Water Research Center. Stevenage Laboratory, England
36 Gevrey M, Dimopoulos I, Lek S. 2003. Review and comparison of methods to study the contribution of variables in artificial neural network models. Ecol Model 160: 249-264   DOI   ScienceOn
37 Gevrey M, Park Y-S, Verdonschot P, Lek S. 2005. Predicting Dutch macroinvertebrate species richness and functional feeding groups using five modelling techniques. In: Modelling Community Structure in Freshwater Ecosystems (Lek S, Scardi M, Verdonschot P, Descy J, Park Y-S, eds). Springer, Berlin, pp 158-166
38 Goh ATC. 1995. Back-propagation neural networks for modelling complex systems. Artificial Intel Eng 9: 143-151   DOI   ScienceOn
39 Scardi M, Harding LW. 1999. Developing an empirical model of phytoplankton primary production: a neural network case study. Ecol Model 120: 213-223   DOI   ScienceOn
40 Rumelhart DE, Hinton GE, Williams RJ. 1986. Learning internal representations by error propagation. In: Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, Vol. I. Foundations (Rumelhart DE, McCelland JL, eds). MIT Press, Cambridge pp 318-362
41 Legendre P, Legendre L. 1998. Numerical Ecology. Elsevier, Amsterdam
42 Cummins KW. 1979. The natural stream ecosystem. In: The Ecology of Regulated Streams (Ward JV, Stanford JA, eds). Plenum Press, New York. pp 7-24
43 Lek S, Delacoste M, Baran P, Dimopoulos I, Lauga J, Aulagnier S. 1996. Application of neural networks to modelling nonlinear relationships in ecology. Ecol Model 90: 39-52   DOI   ScienceOn
44 Furse MT, Moss D, Wright JF, Armitage P. 1984. The influence of seasonal and taxonomic factors on the ordination and classification of running water sites in Great Britain, and on the prediction of their macroinvertebrate communities. Freshwat Biol 14: 257-280   DOI
45 Feminella JW, Resh VH. 1990. Hydrologic influences, disturbance, and intraspecific competition in a stream caddisfly population. Ecology 71: 2083-2094   DOI   ScienceOn
46 Lek S, Guégan JF (eds). 2000. Artificial Neuronal Networks: Application to Ecology and Evolution. Springer-Verlag, Berlin
47 Lek S, Guégan JF. 1999. Artificial neural networks as a tool in ecological modelling an introduction. Ecol Model 120: 65-73   DOI   ScienceOn
48 Lek S, Scardi M, Verdonschot P, Descy J, Park Y-S (eds). 2005. Modelling Community Structure in Freshwater Ecosystems. Springer, Berlin
49 Lek S, Delacoste M, Baran P, Dimopoulos I, Lauga J, Aulagnier S. 1996. Application of neural networks to modelling nonlinear relationships in ecology. Ecol Model 90: 39-52   DOI   ScienceOn
50 Jorgensen SE, Verdonschot P, Lek S. 2002. Explanation of the observed structure of functional feeding groups of aquatic macro-invertebrates by an ecological and the maximum exergy principle. Ecol Model 158: 223-231   DOI   ScienceOn
51 Kung SY. 1993. Digital Neural Networks. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey
52 Verdonschot PFM, Nijboer RC. 2000. Typology of macrofaunal assemblages applied to water and nature management: a Dutch approach. In: Assessing the Biological Quality of Fresh Waters (Wright JF, Sutcliffe DW, Furse MT, eds). RIVPACS and other techniques. Freshwater Biological Association, Ambleside, Cumbria, UK. pp 241-262
53 Malmqvist B, Otto C. 1987. The influence of substrate stability on the composition of stream benthos: an experimental study. Oikos 48: 33-38   DOI
54 Mihuc TB. 1997. The functional trophic role of lotic primary consumers: generalist versus specialist strategier. Freshwater Biol 37: 455-462   DOI   ScienceOn
55 Recknagel F, French M, Harkonen P, Yabunaka K-L. 1997. Artificial neural network approach for modelling and prediction of algal blooms. Ecol Model 96: 11-28   DOI   ScienceOn
56 Smith MJ, Kay WR, Edward DHD, Papas PJ, Richardson KSJ, Simpson JS. 1999. AusRivAs: using macroinvertevrates to assess ecological conditions of rivers in Western Australia. Fresh Biol 41: 269-282   DOI   ScienceOn
57 Vannote RL, Minshall GW, Cummins KW, Sedell JR, Cushing CE. 1980. The river continuum concept. Can J Fish Aqua Sci 37: 130- 137   DOI
58 Wiggins GB, Mackay RJ. 1978. Some relationships between systematic and trophic ecology in Nearctic aquatic insects, with special reference to Trichoptera. Ecology 59: 1211-1220   DOI   ScienceOn
59 Brittain JE, Saltveit SJ. 1989. A review of the effect of river regulation on mayflies (Ephemeroptera). Reg Riv Res Manage 3: 191-204   DOI
60 Callisto M, Esteves FA. 1998. Categorização funcional dos macroinvertebrados bentônicos em quarto ecossistemas lóticos sob influência das atividades de umamineração de bauxita na amazônia central (Brasil). Oecologia Brasiliensis 5: 223-234   DOI