Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5141/JEFB.2007.30.4.347

Structure and Dynamics of Korean Red Pine Stands Established as Riparian Vegetation at the Tsang Stream in Mt. Seorak National Park, Eastern Korea  

Chun, Young-Moon (Department of Biology, Sunchon National University)
Park, Sung-Ae (Faculty of Environment and Life Sciences, Seoul Women's University)
Lee, Chang-Seok (Faculty of Environment and Life Sciences, Seoul Women's University)
Publication Information
Journal of Ecology and Environment / v.30, no.4, 2007 , pp. 347-356 More about this Journal
Abstract
The structure and dynamics of Korean red pine stands established in the riparian zone were studied in the Tsang stream in Mt. Seorak National Park, in east-central Korea. Pine stands were classified into four successional stages, the initial, establishing, competitive, and stabilizing stages, based on the age distribution of a dominant tree, Pinus densiflora, the vegetation stratification, and the microtopography of the riverine environment. The stages usually corresponded to disturbance frequencies, depending on the horizontal and vertical distances from the watercourse. Stands of the initial and establishing stages lacked tree or subtree layers, or both. As stands progressed through the developmental stages, soil particle size became finer and moisture retention capacity was improved. The stand ordination reflected the developmental stage, and the species ordination differentiated species specializing in relatively dry and wet habitats. The results of the analysis of vegetation dynamics provided ecological information which will be useful for understanding the developmental processes of vegetation established in riparian zones. Species diversity indices usually increased across developmental stages, following the typical pattern for successional processes. We discuss the importance and necessity of riparian vegetation in Korea, where most riparian forests have disappeared due to excessive human land use.
Keywords
Developmental stage; Korean red pine; Mt. Seorak; Riparian forest; Vegetation structure and dynamics;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Song JS, Song SD. 1996. A phytosociological study on the riverside vegetation around Hanchon, an upper stream of Nak-tong River. Kor J Ecol 19: 431-451   과학기술학회마을
2 Sweeney, BW. 1993. Effects of streamside vegetation on macroinvertebrate communities of White Clay Creek in eastern North America. Proc Acad Natl Sci Phila 144: 291-340
3 Toyohara G. 1984. A phytosociological study and a tentative draft on vegetation mapping of the secondary forests in Hiroshima Prefecture with special reference to pine forests. J Sci Hiroshima Univ Ser B/2: 131-170
4 Tsujimoto T. 1999. Fluvial processes in streams with vegetation. J Hydraulic Res 37: 789-803   DOI   ScienceOn
5 US EPA. 1995. Ecological restoration: a tool to manage stream quality. Office of water, US EPA, Washington DC, EPA 841-F-95-007
6 van Andel J, Bakker JP, Grootjans AP. 1993. Mechanisms of vegetation succession: a review of concepts and perspectives. Acta Bot Neer 42: 413-433   DOI
7 van der Maarel E. 1979. Transformation of cover-abundance values in phytosociology and its effects on community similarity. Vegetatio 39: 97-114   DOI
8 van der Maarel E, Sykes MT. 1993. Small-scale plant species turnover in a limestone grassland: the carousel model and some comments on the niche concept. J Veg Sci 4: 179-188   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Watt AS. 1947. Pattern and process in the plant community. J Ecol 35: 1-22   DOI   ScienceOn
10 White PS, Pickett STA. 1985. The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics. Academic Press, San Diego, California
11 Williams CE, Johnson WC. 1990. Age structure and the maintenance of Pinus pungens in pine-oak forests of southwestern Virginia. Am Midl Nat 124: 130-141   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Yim YJ, Baik SD. 1985. The vegetation of Mt. Seolag. Chung-Ang University Press, Seoul
13 Naiman RJ, Bilby RE (eds). 1998. River Ecology and Management: Lessons From the Pacific Coastal Ecoregion. Springer-Verlag, NY
14 Naiman RJ, Decamps H (eds). 1990. The Ecology and Management of Aquatic-Terrestrial Ecotones. Parthenon Publishing, Carnforth
15 Naiman RJ, Decamps H. 1997. The ecology of interfaces: riparian Zones. Ann Rev Ecol Sys 28: 621-658   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Oliver CD, Larson BC. 1990. Forest Stand Dynamics. McGraw-Hill Inc, NY
17 Orwig DA, Abrams MD. 1994. Land-use history (1729-1992), composition, and dynamics of oak-pine forests within the Piedmont and coastal plain northern Virginia. Can J For Res 24: 1216-1225   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Petts GE. 1990. Forested river corridors: a lost resource? In: Water Engineering and Landscape (Cosgrove D, Petts GE, eds). Belhaven, London, pp 12-34
19 Petts GE, Moller H, Roux AL (eds). 1989. Historical Changes of Large Alluvial Rivers: Western Europe. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester
20 Pinay GH, Decamps H. 1988. The role of riparian woods in regulating nitrogen fluxes between the alluvial aquifer and surface water: a conceptual model. Regulated Rivers. Res Manag 2: 507-516   DOI
21 Runkle, JR. 1985. Disturbance regimes in temperate forests. In: Disturbance and patch dynamics (Pickett STA, White STA, eds). Academic Press, NY, pp 17-34
22 Salinas MJ, Guirado J. 2002. Riparian plant restoration in summer-dry riverbeds of Southeastern Spain. Rest Ecol 10: 695-702   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Samuels M L, Witmer J A. 2003. Statistics for the Life Sciences. Pearson Education International, New Jersey
24 Skeen JN, Doerr PD, Van Lear DH. 1993. Oak-hickory-pine forests. In: Biodiversity of the Southeastern United States: Upland Terrestrial Communities, (Martin WH, Boyce SG, Echternacht AC, eds). John Wiley & Sons, NY, pp 1-34
25 Lee IK. 1976. The distribution and the actual state of Pinus densiflora in Korea. Nat Cons 13: 5-8
26 Lee YK, Kim JW. 2005. Riparian vegetation of South Korea. Keimyung University Press, Daegu
27 Lowrance R, Altier LS, Newbold JD, Schnabel RR, Groffman PM, Denver JM, Correll DL, Gilliam, JW, Robinson JL, Bringsfield RS, Staver KW, Lucas W, Todd AH. 1995. Water quality functions of riparian forest buffer systems in the Chesapeake Bay watershed. EPA 903-R-95-004. US EPA, Washington DC
28 Lowrance R, Vellidis G, Wauchope RD, Gay P, Bosch DD. 1997a. Herbicidic transport in a managed riparian forest buffer system. Trans Am Soc Agric Eng 40: 1047-1057   DOI
29 Lowrance R, Altier LS , Newbold JD, Schnabel RR, Groffman PM, Denver JM, Correll DL, Gilliam JW, Robinson JL, Bringsfield RS, Staver KW, Lucas W, Todd AH. 1997b. Water quality functions of riparian forest buffer systems in the Chesapeake Bay watershed. Environ Manag 21: 687-712   DOI
30 Malanson GP. 1993. Riparian landscapes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
31 Ming D. 1987. Population structure and dynamics of Pinus massoniana Lamb. on mount Jinyun, Sichuan, China. Vegetatio 72: 35-44   DOI
32 McCook LJ. 1994. Understanding ecololgical community succession: Causal models and theories, a review. Vegetatio 110: 115-147   DOI
33 McCune B, Mefford MJ. 1999. PC-ORD, Multivariate analysis of ecological data. Version 4.0. MJM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, Oregon
34 Miles J. 1979. Vegetation Dynamics. Chapman and Hall, London
35 Lee CS, You YH, Robinson GR. 2002. Secondary succession and natural habitat restoration in abandoned rice fields of central Korea. Rest Ecol 10: 306-314   DOI   ScienceOn
36 Lee HS, Yoo HM, Lee CS. 2003. Distribution pattern of white snakeroot as an invasive alien plant and restoration strategy to inhibit its expansion in Seoripool park, Seoul. Kor J Biol Sci 7: 197-205   DOI
37 Howard-Williams C, Pickmere S, Davies J. 1986. Nutrient retention and processing in New Zealand streams: the influence of riparian vegetation. New Zealand Agri Sci 20: 110-114
38 Johnson RR, Simpson JM. 1971. Important birds from Blue Point cottonwoods, Maricopa County, Arizona. Condor 73: 379-380   DOI   ScienceOn
39 Kim JG, Yim YJ. 1991. Vegetation seres on the pebble area at Gyebang stream bank of North Han River in Korea. Kor J Ecol 14: 195-210
40 KMA (Korea Meteorological Administration). 2001. Annual climatological report
41 Lee CS. 1995a. Disturbance regime of the Pinus densiflora forest in Korea. Kor J Ecol 18: 179-188
42 Lee CS. 1995b. Regeneration process after disturbance of the Pinus densiflora forest in Korea. Kor J Ecol 18: 189-201
43 Lee CS, Hong SK. 2001. Landscape ecological perspectives in the structure and dynamics of fire-disturbed by fire. Kor J Ecol 21: 389-399
44 Lee CS. 1996. Structure and dynamics of riparian vegetation in DMZ and CCZ. Ecosystem Survey Report on DMZ and CCZ. Forestry Research Institute, Seoul
45 Lee, CS, Kim JH, Yi H, You YH. 2004. Seedling establishment and regeneration of Korean red pine (Pinus densiflora S. et Z.) forests in Korea. For Ecol Manage 199: 423-432   DOI   ScienceOn
46 Lee, CS, Cho YC, Shin HC, Moon JS, Lee BC Lee, Bae YS, Byun HG and Yi H. 2005. Ecological response of streams in Korea under different management regimes. Water Engin Res 6:131-147
47 Lee CS, Kim HE. 1989. Ecological study for natural regeneration by selfsown of Pinus densiflora forest. Res Rep Agric Sci Chungbuk Natl. Univ. 7: 100-109
48 Lee, CS, Moon JS, Woo HS, Ahn HG, Cho GH, Bae YS, and Byun HG. 2006. An analysis on landscape structure and biodiversity of the Bokha River as a model to restore the degraded urban river. J Ecol Field Biol 29: 113-124   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn
49 Chun YM, Lee HJ, Lee CS. 2006. Vegetation trajectories of Korean red pine (Pinus densiflora Sieb. et Zucc.) forests at Mt. Seorak, Korea. J Plant Biol 49: 141-152   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn
50 Clement FE. 1916. Plant Succession: Analysis of the Development of Vegetation Carnegie Institute of Washington Publication. No. 242, Washington DC
51 Cooke JG, Cooper AB. 1988. Sources and sinks of nutrients in a New Zealand hill pasture catchment. III. Nitrogen. Hydrological Processes 2: 135-149   DOI
52 Daily GC, Ellison K. 2002. The new economy of nature. Island Press, Washington DC
53 Day RJ. 1972. Stand structure, succession, and use of southern Alberta's Rocky Mountain forest. Ecology 53: 474-478
54 Gregory SV, Swanson FJ, McKee WA, Cummins KW. 1991. An ecosystem perspective of riparian zones. BioScience 41: 540-551   DOI   ScienceOn
55 Decamps H. 1996. Edgardo baldi memorial lecture. The renewal of floodplain forests along rivers: A landscape perspective. Verh Internat Verein Limnol 26: 35-59
56 Dister E, Gomer D, Obrdlik P, Petermann P, Schneider E. 1990. Water management and ecological perspectives of the Upper Rhine's floodplains. Reg Rivers Res Manag 5: 1-15   DOI
57 Fustec EA, Mariott, Grillo X, Sajus J. 1991. Nitrate removal by denitrification in alluvial groundwater: Role of a former channel. J Hydrology 123: 337-354   DOI   ScienceOn
58 Haycock NE, Burt TP. 1990. Handling excess nitrates. Nature 348: 29
59 Haycock NE, Burt TP. 1991. The sensitivity of rivers to nitrate leaching: the effectiveness of near-stream land as a nutrient retention zone. In: Landscape sensitivity (Allison RJ, Thomas DSG, eds). John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, pp 261-271
60 Hill MO. 1979. DECORANA - a FORTRAN program for detrended correspondence analysis and reciprocal averaging. Cornell Univ Ithaca, NY
61 Adam P. 1990. Salt marsh Ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
62 Braun-Blanquet J. 1964. Pflanzensoziologie. Grundzge der Vegetationskunde. Springer-Verlag. Wien
63 Agee JK. 1993. Fire Ecology of Pacific Northwest Forests. Island Press, Washington DC
64 Andrzejczyk T, Brzeziecki B. 1995. The structure and dynamics of old-growth Pinus sylvestris (L.) stands in the Wigry National Park, north-eastern Poland. Vegetatio 117: 81-94   DOI
65 Barbour MG, Burk JH, Pitts WD, Gilliam FS, Schwartz MW. 1998. Terrestrial Plant Ecology. Addison Wesley Longham, Inc, NY
66 Bravard JP, Amoros C, Pautou G, 1986. Impact of civil engineering works on the successions of communities in a fluvial system. Oikos 47: 92-111   DOI
67 Briggs M. 1996. Riparian ecosystem recovery in arid lands: strategies and references. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, Arizona
68 Carothers SW, Johnson RR, Aitchison SW. 1974. Population structure and social organization of the southwestern riparian birds. American Zoologist 14: 97-108   DOI