Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5141/JEFB.2006.29.5.411

Comparison of Mating Systems in Populations of Gleditsia japonica var. koraiensis  

Huh, Man-Kyu (Department of Molecular Biology, Dong-eui University)
Publication Information
Journal of Ecology and Environment / v.29, no.5, 2006 , pp. 411-414 More about this Journal
Abstract
The mating systems of two groups of natural populations of Gleditsia japonica var. koraiensis in Korea were determined using allozyme analysis. The result suggests that G. japonica var. koraiensis is predominantly outcrossing. The tm values of eight populations in Korea varied from 0.667 (Mdh-1) to 0.938 (ldh-1), giving an average 0.820. Population and individual outcrossing estimates were associated with flowering tree density or degree of spatial isolation. The reason for relatively low outcrossing rates of some populations could be attributed to reduction of effective population sizes of sib for the medicine, small population size, and isolation of flowering mature trees. The heterozygote excesses were observed in some natural populations, whereas other populations exhibited varying degrees of inbreeding and heterozygotes deficit. Thus, selection against homozygotes operated in the progeny populations throughout the life cycle.
Keywords
Gleditsia japonica var. koraiensis; Mating systems; Allozyme analysis;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Holsinger KE. 1991. Mass-action models of plant mating systems: the evolutionary stability of mixed mating systems. Am Nat 138: 606- 622   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Nei M, Murawama T, Chakraborty R. 1975. The bottleneck effect and genetic variability in populations. Evolution 29: 1-10   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Yagoubi b, Chriki A. 2000. Estimation of mating system parameters in Hedysarum coronarium L. (Leguminosae, Fabaceae). Agronmie 20: 933-942   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Brown AHD. 1990. Genetic characterization of plant mating systems. In: Plant population genetics, breeding, and genetic resources (Brown AHD, Clegg MT, Kaher AL, Weir BS, eds), Sinaur, Sunderland, Massachusetts. pp 145-162
5 Brown AHD, Allard RW. 1970. Estimation of the mating system in open-pollinated maize populations using isozyme polymorphisms. Genetics 66: 133-145
6 Clegg MT. 1980. Measuring plant mating systems. BioScience 30: 814- 818   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Escalante AM, Coello G, Eguiarte LE. 1994. Genetic structure and mating systems in wild and cultivated populations of Phaseolus coccineus and P. vulgaris (Fabaceae). Am J Bot 81: 1096-1103   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Fyfe JL, Bailey NTJ. 1951. Plant breeding studies in leguminous forage crops. 1. Natural cross breeding in winter beans. J Agri Sci 41: 371-378   DOI
9 Heywood JC. 1991. Spatial analysis of genetic variation in plant populations. Ann Rew Eco Syst 22: 335-355   DOI
10 Liengsiri C, Boyle TJB, Yeh FC. 1998. Mating system in Pterocarpus macrocarpus Kurz in Thailand. J Hered 89: 216-221   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Riberiro RA, Lovato MB. 2004. Mating system in a neotropical tree species, Senna multijuga (Fabaceae). Genet Mol Biol 27: 418-424   DOI
12 Ritland K. 1990. A serious of FORTRAN computer programs for estimating plant mating systems. J Hered 81: 235-237
13 Schnabel A. 1988. Genetic structure and gene flow in Geledtsia tricanthos L. Ph.D. Dissertation. Univ of Kansas, Lawrence
14 Schnabel A, Hamrick JL. 1990. Organization of genetic diversity within and among populations of Geledtsia tricanthos (Leguminosae). Am J Bot 77: 1060-1069   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B. 1987. Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Ann Rev Eco and Syst 18: 237-268   DOI
16 Soltis DE, Haufler H, Darrow DC, Gastony GJ. 1983. Starch gel electrophoresis of ferns: A complication of grinding buffers, gel and electrode buffers, and staining schedules. Am Fern J 73: 9-27   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Uyenoyama MK. 1986. Inbreeding and the cost of meiosis: the evolution of selfing in population practicing biparental inbreeding. Evolution 40: 388-404   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Kim CG, Choung Y, Joo KY, Lee KS. 2006. Effects of hillslope treats for vegetation development and soil conservation in burned forests. J Ecol Field Biol 29: 295-303   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Cruzan MB, Hamrick JL, Arnold ML, Bennet BD. 1994. Mating system variation in hybridizing irises effects of phenology and floral densities on family rates. Heredity 72: 95-105   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Kang HS, Lee DK. 2006. Stand structure and regeneration pattern of Kalopanax septemlobus at the national deciduous broad- leaved forest in Mt. Jeombong, Korea. J Ecol Field Biol 29: 17-22   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Heywood JC. 1993. Biparental inbreeding depression in the self- incompatible annual plant Gaillardia pulchella (Asteraceae). Am J Bot 80: 545-550   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Woodland DW. 1991. Contemporary plant systematics. Prentice-Hall Inc., New Jersey, 582 pp
23 Wright S. 1965. The interpretation of population structure by F-statistics with special regard to systems of mating. Evolution 19: 395-420   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Murawski DA, Hamrick JL. 1992. Mating system and phenology of Ceiba pentandra (Bombacaceae) in central Panama. J Hered 83: 401-404   DOI
25 Hall P, Chase MR, Bawa KS. 1994. Low genetic variation but high population differentiation in a common tropical forest tree species. Conserv Biol 8: 471-482   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Maki M. 1993. Outcrossing and fecundity advantage of females in gynodiecious Chiongraphis japonica var. eurohimensis (Liliaceae). Am J Bot 80: 629-634   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Murawski DA, Dayanandan B, Bawa KS. 1994. Outcrossing rates of two endemic Shorea species from Sri Lankan tropical rain forests. Biotropica 26: 23-29   DOI   ScienceOn