Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5141/JEFB.2006.29.4.331

Estimating Detection Probabilities and Site Occupancy Rates of Three Anuran Species Using Call Surveys in Haenam Gun, Korea  

Sung, Ha-Cheol (Department of Biology Education, Korea National University of Education)
Kim, Su-Kyung (Department of Biology Education, Korea National University of Education)
Cheong, Seok-Wan (Department of Biology Education, Korea National University of Education)
Park, Shi-Ryong (Department of Biology Education, Korea National University of Education)
Roh, Dong-Chan (Jeonbuk Science High School)
Baek, Kyung-Whan (Haenam High School)
Lee, Jung-Hyun (Department of Science Education, Kangwon National University)
Park, Dae-Sik (Department of Science Education, Kangwon National University)
Publication Information
Journal of Ecology and Environment / v.29, no.4, 2006 , pp. 331-335 More about this Journal
Abstract
We investigated the distribution of three anuran species, Three-striped pond frogs (Rana nigromaculata), Bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana), and Narrow-mouthed toads (Kaloula borealis), in an administrative district, Haenam Gun, Junnam Province, Korea using volunteer call surveys. Twenty-eight volunteer call surveyors were assigned to each $2{\times}2km^2$ survey plot. Call surveys on whether the species are present or not were conducted for 5 minutes between 30 minutes after sunset and the midnight on rice fields and ponds from 10 April to 28 August in 2005. Depending on species, call surveys were carried out at seven to 28 plots with average 8.4 to 10.7 visits per the plot. We calculated the detection probabilities and occupancy rates of the three species using four models with three covariates: temperature, humidity, and the amount of water at the habitat. The model average detection probabilities of three anuran species of R. nigromaculata, R. catesbeiana, and K. borealis were 0.53, 0.74, and 0.41 respectively, and the site occupancy rates of them were 0.93, 0.94, and 0.86 respectively. Our results indicate that R. nigromaculata, R. catesbeiana, and K. borealis are common in Haenam Gun.
Keywords
Anuran species; Call survey; Kaloula borealis; Rana catesbeiana; Rana nigromaculata; Site occupancy rate;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Alford RA, Richards SJ. 1999. Global amphibian declines: a problem in applied ecology. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 30: 133-165   DOI
2 Bell BD, Carver S, Mitchell NJ, Pledger S. 2004. The recent decline of a New Zealand endemic: how and why did populations of Archey's frog Leiopelma archeyi crash over 1996-2001? Biol Conserv 120: 189-199   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Bridges AS, Dorcas ME. 2000. Temporal variation in anuran calling behavior: implications for surveys and monitoring programs. Copeia 2000: 587-592   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Burnham KP, Anderson DR. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edition. Springer-Verlag, New York
5 Campbell SP, Clark JA, Crampton L, Guerry AD, Hatch LR, Hosseini PR, Lawler JJ, O'Connor RJ. 2002. An assessment of monitoring efforts in endangered species recovery plans. Ecol Appl 12: 674- 681   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Cooke AS. 1972. Indications of recent change in status in the British Isles of the frog (Rana temporaria) and the toad (Bufo bufo). J Zool 167: 161-178
7 MacKenzie DI, Nichols JD, Lachman GB, Droege S, Royle JA, Langtimm CA. 2002. Estimating site occupancy rates when detection probabilities are less than one. Ecology 83: 2248-2255   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Sung HC, Kim SK, Park SR, Park DS. 2005. Effectiveness of mating call playbacks in anuran call monitoring: a case study of Threestriped pond frogs (Rana nigromaculata). Integ Biosci 9: 199-203   과학기술학회마을
9 Wake DB. 1991. Declining amphibian populations. Science 253: 860   DOI
10 Yoccoz NG, Nichols JD, Boulinier T. 2001. Monitoring of biological diversity in space and time; concepts, methods and designs. Trends Ecol Evol 16: 446-453   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Schmidt BR. 2005. Monitoring the distribution of pond-breeding amphibians when species are detected imperfectly. Aquatic Conserv 15: 681-692   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Blaustein AR, Wake DB. 1990. Declining amphibian populations: a global phenomenon? Trends Ecol Evol 5: 203-204   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Houlahan JE, Findlay CS, Schmidt BR, Meyer AH, Kuzmin SL. 2000 Quantitative evidence for global amphibian population declines. Nature (London) 404: 752-755   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Pellet J, Schmidt BR. 2005. Monitoring distributions using call surveys: Estimating site occupancy, detection probabilities and inferring absence. Biol Conserv 123: 27-35   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Richter SC, Young JE, Johnson GN, Seigel RA. 2003. Stochastic variation in reproductive success of a rare frog, Rana sevosa: implications for conservation and for monitoring amphibian populations. Biol Conserv 111: 171-177   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Royle JA. 2004. N-mixture models for estimating population size from spatially replicated counts. Biometrics 60:108-115   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Storfer A. 2003. Amphibian declines: Future directions. Divers Distrib 9: 151-163   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Pollock KH, Nichols JD, Farnsworth G, Simons TR, Bailey L, Sauer JR. 2002. Large-scale wildlife monitoring studies: Statistical methods for design and analysis. Environmetrics 13: 1-15   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Bailey LL, Simons TR, Pollock KH. 2004. Spatial and temporal variation in detection probability of Plethodon salamanders using the robust capturerecapture design. J Wildl Manage 68: 14-24   DOI   ScienceOn
20 MacKenzie DI. 2005. Was it there? Dealing with imperfect detection for species presence/absence data. Aust New Zealand J Stat 47: 65-74   DOI   ScienceOn
21 McDiarmid RW, Donnelly MA. 1994. Group activities and field trips. In: Measuring and monitoring biological diversity-standard methods for amphibians (Heyer W, McDiarmid RW, Donnelly M, Hayek L, eds). Smithsonian Institute Press, Washington DC