Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5141/JEFB.2002.25.1.001

Experimental Techniques for Evaluating the Success of Restoration Projects  

Robinson, George R. (Department of Biological Sciences, State University of New York at Albany)
Handel, Steven-N.l (Department of Ecology and & Evolutionary Biology, Rutgers University)
Mattei, Jennifer (Biology department, Sacred heart University)
Publication Information
The Korean Journal of Ecology / v.25, no.1, 2002 , pp. 1-7 More about this Journal
Abstract
The ecological background of a restoration project is complex and difficult to betermine without experimentation. A useful context for experiments is the well-studied process of natural succession, because the factors that drive or inhibit succession are also at work during reclamation (a form of primary succession) and restoration (which often resembles secondary succession). Using experimental studies on urban wasteland reclamation, we have tested for factors that stimulate or inhibit succession during early phases of woodland development in the Northeastern United states. The emphasis has been on mutualisms (seed dispersal, pollination, and mycorrhizae) and microsite limitations in the recruitment, growth, and reproduction of woody plants. Using plantings of seeds, seedlings, and clusters of reproductively mature plants on abandoned landfills, we have observed that (1) soil microsite deficiencies lead to very poor germination (<0.1$\%$) and seedling survival (<0.01$\%$) of most native species; (2) seed dispersal by birds is a significant and reliable source of woody plant recruitment; however (3) proximity effects are strong, with most (up to 95$\%$) of seed rain falling in the vicinity of planted clusters that are closest to putative seed sources; and (4) remnant natural woodlands are critical components of the recruitment process. To emphasize the last point, in one case, we found that the destruction of approximately 50$\%$ of nearby natural woodland vegetation led to a commensurate decline in seed rain. In another case, we found that the species richness of recruits was strictly limited by the species composition of nearby source plant communities, with no evidence of community enrichment by long distance dispersal over 5 years. We conclude from these results that the size and proximity of remnant natural populations are critical considerations when planning reclamation and restoration programs that rely on natural successional processes.
Keywords
Reclamation; Remnant natural populations; Restoration;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Aber, J. D. 1987. Restored forests and the identification of critical factors in species-site interactions. Pages 241-250 In W.R. Jordan III, M.E. Gilpin, and J.D. Aber (Eds.), Restoration Ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England
2 Bazzaz, F. A. 1990. Plant-plant interactions in successional environments. Pages 239-263 In J.B. Grace and D. Tilman (Eds.), Perspectives on Plant Competition. Academic Press, New York
3 Bell, S. S. , M. S. Fonseca, and L. B. Motten. 1997. Linking restoration and landscape ecology. Restoration Ecology 5: 318-323   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Berger, J. J. 1993. Ecological restoration and non indigenous plant species: A review. Restoration Ecology 1: 74-82   DOI
5 Bradshaw, A. D. 1992. The biology of land restoration. Pages 25-44 In S.K. Jain and L.W. Botsford (Eds.), Applied Population Biology. Klumer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
6 Guarani, M. R., R. Rheingans and F. Matagnini. 1995. Early woody plant invasions under tree plantations in Costa Rica: Implications for forest restoration. Restoration Ecology 3: 252-266   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Guevara, S., S. E. Purata and E. Van der Maarel. 1986. The role of remnant forest trees in tropical secondary succession Vegetatio 66: 77-84
8 Ash, H.J., R. P. Gemmell and A. D. Bradshaw. 1994. The introduction of native plant species on industrial waste heaps: A test of immigration and other factors affecting primary succession. Journal of Applied Ecology 31: 74-84   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Ashby, W. C. 1987. Forests. Pages 89-108 In W.R. Jordan III, M.E. Gilpin, and J.D. Aber (Eds.), Restoration Ecology Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England
10 Auld, B. A. and B. G. Coote. 1980. A model of a spreading plant population. Oikos 34:287-292   DOI
11 McClanahan, T. R. and R. W. Wolfe. 1987. Dispersal of ornithochorous seeds from forest edges in central Florida. Vegetatio 71:107-112
12 McDonnell, M. J. 1986. Old field vegetation height and the dispersal pattern of bird-disseminated woody plants. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 113:6-11   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Montalvo, A. M., S. L. Williams, K. J. Rice, S. L. Buchmann, C. Cory, S. N. Handel, G. P. Nabhan, R. Primack and R.H. Robichaux. 1997. Restoration biology: A population biology perspective. Restoratlon Ecology 5:277-290   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Moody, M. E. and R. N. Mack. 1988. Controlling the spread of plant invasions: The importance of nascent foci. Journal of Applied Ecology. 25:1009-1021   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Harper, J. L. 1977. Population Biology of Plants. Academic Press, New York
16 Woodwell, G. M. 1992. When succession fails... Pages 27-35. In M.K. Wali (Ed.), Ecosystem Rehabilitation. Volume 2: Ecosystem Analysis and Synthesis. SPB Academic, The Hague, The Netherlands
17 Handel, S. N. 1997. The role of plant-animal mutualisms in the design and restoration of natural communities. Pages 111-132. In K. M. Urbanska, N.R. Webb, and P.J. Edwards (Eds.), Restoration ecology and sustainable development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
18 Handel, S. N., G. R. Robinson and A. J. Beattie. 1994. Biodiversity resources for ecological restoration. Restoration Ecology 2:230-241   DOI
19 Harper, J. L. 1987. The heuristic value of ecological restoration. Pages 35-45. In W.R. Jordan III, M.E. Gilpin, and J.D. Aber (Eds.), Restoration Ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England
20 Krefting, L. W. and E. I. Roe. 1949. The role of some birds and mammals in seed germination. Ecological Monographs 19: 269-286   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Luken, J. O. 1990. Directing Ecological Succession. Chapman and Hall, London
22 Stapanian, M. A. 1986. Seed dispersal by birds and squirrels in the deciduous forests of the United States. Pages 225-236, In Estrada, A. and Fleming, T.H. (Eds.), Frugivores and Seed Dispersal. Dr W. Junk, Dordrecht
23 Robinson, G. R., and S. N. Handel. 1993. Forest restoration on a closed landfill: Rapid addition of new species by bird dispersal. Conservation Biology 7: 271-278   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Robinson, G. R., S. N. Handel and V.R. Schmalhofer. 1992. Survival, Reproduction, and recruitment of woody plants after 14 years on a reforested landfill. Environmental Management 16:265-271   DOI
25 Robinson, G. R. and S. N. Handel. 1999. Spatial and temporal patterns of recruitment in an urban woodland restoration. Ecological Applications 10:174-188   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Stiles, E. W. 1989. Fruits, seeds, and dispersal agents. Pages 87-122 In W.G. Abrahamson, editor. Plant-Animal Interactions. McGraw-Hill, NewYork
27 Wunderle, J. M. 1997. The role of animal seed dispersal in accelerating native forest regeneration on degraded tropical lands. Forest Ecology and Management 99:223-235   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Young, J. A. and C. G. Young. 1992. Seeds of Woody Plants in North America. Discorides Press, Portland, Oregon, 407 pp
29 Bradshaw, A. D. 1984. Ecological principles and land reclamation practice. Landscape Planning 11: 35-8   DOI   ScienceOn
30 Bradshaw, A. D. 1983. Ecological principles in landscape. Pages 15-36 In Bradshaw, A.D., Goode, D.A., and Thorp, E.H.P. (Eds.), Ecology and Design in Landscape. Blackwell, Oxford
31 Archibold, O. W. 1979. Seed input as a factor in the regeneration of strip-mine wastes in Saskatchewan. Can. J. Bot. 58:1490-95
32 Bradshaw, A. D. 1989. Management problems arising from successional processes. Pages 68-78 In Buckley, G.P. (Ed.), Biological Habitat Reconstruction. Belhaven Press, London
33 Austin, M. P. 1981. Permanent quadrats: an interface for theory and practice. Vegetatio 46:1-10   DOI
34 Bastin, L. and C. D. Thomas. 1999. The distribution of plant species in urban vegetation fragments. Landscape Ecology 14:493-507   DOI   ScienceOn
35 Duncan, R. S. and C. A. Chapman. 1999. Seed dispersal and potential forest succession in abandoned agriculture in tropical Africa. Ecological Applications 9: 998-1008   DOI   ScienceOn
36 Ehrenfeld, J. G. and L. A. Toth. 1997. Restoration ecology and the ecosystem perspective. Restoration Ecology 5: 307-317   DOI   ScienceOn
37 Finegan, B. 1984. Forest succession. Nature 312:109-114   DOI
38 Gill, D. S. and P. L. Marks 1991. Tree and shrub seedling colonization of old fields in central New York. Ecological Monographs 61:183-205   DOI   ScienceOn
39 Glass, S. 1989. The role of soil seed banks in restoration and management. Restoration and Management Notes 7:24-29
40 Parker, V. T. 1997. The scale of successional models and restoration objectives. Restoration Ecology 5: 301-306   DOI   ScienceOn
41 Ray, G. R. and B. J. Brown. 1994. Seed ecology of woody species in a Caribbean dry forest. Restoration Ecology 2: 156-163   DOI
42 Buckley, G. P. and D. G. Knight. 1989. The feasibility of woodland reconstruction. Pages 171-187 In Buckley, G P. (Ed.), Biological Habitat Reconstruction. Belhaven Press, London
43 Chan, F. J., R.W. Harris and A. T. Leiser. 1977. Direct seeding woody plants in the landscape. Division of Agricultural Sciences, University of California, Leaflet 2577
44 Da Silva, J. M. C., C. Uhl and G. Murray. 1996. Plant succession, landscape management, and the ecology of frugivorous birds in abandoned Amazonian pastures. Conservation Biology 10:491-503   DOI   ScienceOn
45 Dobson, A. P., A. D. Bradshaw and A. J. M. Baker. 1997. Hopes for the future: Restoration ecology and conservation biology. Science 277: 515-522   DOI   ScienceOn
46 Turner, I. M., and R. T. Corlett. 1996. The conservation value of small, isolated fragments of lowland tropical rain forest. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11: 330-333   DOI   ScienceOn
47 Urbanska, K. M. 1997. Safe sites - interface of plant population ecology and restoration ecology. Pages 81-110. In K.M. Urbanska, N. R. Webb, and P. J. Edwards (Eds,), Restoration ecology and sustainable development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
48 van Aarde, R. J., S. M. Ferreira, J. J. Kritzinger, P. J. van Dyck, M. Vogt, and T. D. Wassenaar. 1997. An evaluation of habitat rehabilitation on coastal dune forests in northern KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Restoration Ecology 4: 334-345   DOI   ScienceOn
49 Vitousek, P. M. C. M. D' Antonio, L.L. Loope and R. Westbrooks. 1996. Biological invasions as global environmental change. American Scientist 84:468-478
50 Yarranton, G. A. and R. G Morrison.. 1974. Spatial dynamics of a primary succession. Nucleation. Journal of Ecology 62: 416-428
51 Yurlina, M. E. 1998. Bee Mutualists and Plant Reproduction in Urban Woodland Restorations. Ph.D. Dissertation, Graduate Program in Ecology and Evolution, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA