Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5385/jksn.2011.18.2.240

Effective Ways of Performing Surveillance Surface Cultures in Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants  

Lee, Ju-Young (Department of Pediatrics, Seoul National University College of Medicine)
Kim, Ee-Kyung (Department of Pediatrics, Seoul National University College of Medicine)
Lee, Jin-A (Department of Pediatrics, Seoul National University College of Medicine)
Choi, Chang-Won (Department of Pediatrics, Seoul National University College of Medicine)
Kim, Han-Suk (Department of Pediatrics, Seoul National University College of Medicine)
Kim, Beyong-Il (Department of Pediatrics, Seoul National University College of Medicine)
Choi, Jung-Hwan (Department of Pediatrics, Seoul National University College of Medicine)
Publication Information
Neonatal Medicine / v.18, no.2, 2011 , pp. 240-247 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: The rationale for skin surface cultures is that bacterial colonization precedes infection and, as a result, that identification of a potential pathogen is predictive of later systemic infection in preterm infants. We aimed to analyze results of surveillance surface cultures in extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants and seek for effective ways of performing surveillance surface cultures. Methods: We analyzed the surveillance surface cultures of 113 ELBW infants over a 4-year period. Surveillance cultures were obtained routinely from five sites: axilla, external ear canal, nasopharynx, throat (or tracheal aspirate if intubated) and anus. Each surface culture obtained during the 13 days, prior to the date of the blood culture, was compared with the blood culture obtained when sepsis was suspected. The sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) of the surveillance cultures were calculated among 1894 blood-surface culture pairs by surface sites, recovered organisms and interval between surveillance samples and blood cultures. Results: The overall sensitivity, specificity and PPV of surface cultures were 45.9, 22.4 and 6.8%, respectively. The PPV was highest for the throat/tracheal cultures (11.0%) and lowest for the anal cultures (2.3%). As the time of culturing progressed toward the day of blood culturing, the sensitivity and specificity of the surface cultures significantly increased. Only axillary and throat/tracheal cultures were useful in predicting the microorganisms causing sepsis. Conclusion: Surface cultures could help to predict sepsis pathogens and infection surveillance in preterm infants could be continued with a reduced number of cultured sites focusing on the axilla and throat/trachea.
Keywords
Extremely low birth weight infant; Neonatal intensive care; Infection control; Culture; Surveillance;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Stoll BJ, Hansen N, Fanaroff AA, Wright LL, Carlo WA, Ehrenkranz RA, et al. Late-onset sepsis in very low birth weight neonates: the experience of the NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Pediatrics 2002;110:285-91.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 van der Zwet WC, Kaiser AM, van Elburg RM, Berkhof J, Fetter WP, Parlevliet GA, et al. Nosocomial infections in a Dutch neonatal intensive care unit: surveillance study with definitions for infection specifically adapted for neonates. J Hosp Infect 2005;61:300-11.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Ligi I, Arnaud F, Jouve E, Tardieu S, Sambuc R, Simeoni U. Iatrogenic events in admitted neonates: a prospective cohort study. Lancet 2008; 371:404-10.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Mireya UA, Marti PO, Xavier KV, Cristina LO, Miguel MM, Magda CM. Nosocomial infections in paediatric and neonatal intensive care units. J Infect 2007;54:212-20.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Sprunt K. Practical use of surveillance for prevention of nosocomial infection. Semin Perinatol 1985;9:47-50.
6 Jolley AE. The value of surveillance cultures on neonatal intensive care units. J Hosp Infect 1993;25:153-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Evans ME, Schaffner W, Federspiel CF, Cotton RB, McKee KT Jr, Stratton CW. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of body surface cultures in a neonatal intensive care unit. JAMA 1988;259:248-52.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Gray JW. Surveillance of infection in neonatal intensive care units. Early Hum Dev 2007;83:157-63.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Kim KN, Park HJ. Changes in pathogens and antibiotic sensitivities in very low birth weight infants with neonatal sepsis. J Korean Soc Neonatol 2008;15:54-60.
10 Park HW, Kim KS, Kim AL, Koo SE, Lee BS, Lim GA, et al. Causative agents and antimicrobial sensitivity of neonatal sepsis: ten-year experience in one neonatal intensive care unit. J Korean Soc Neonatol 2009;16:172-81.
11 Pittet D. Infection control and quality health care in the new millennium. Am J Infect Control 2005;33:258-67.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Schwab F, Geffers C, Barwolff S, Ruden H, Gastmeier P. Reducing neonatal nosocomial bloodstream infections through participation in a national surveillance system. J Hosp Infect 2007;65:319-25.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Puri J, Revathi G, Faridi MM, Talwar V, Kumar A, Parkash B. Role of body surface cultures in prediction of sepsis in a neonatal intensive care unit. Ann Trop Paediatr 1995;15:307-11.
14 Shenoy S, Antony G, Shenoy UV. Value of superficial cultures in diagnosing neonatal sepsis. Indian J Pediatr 2000;67:337-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Choi Y, Saha SK, Ahmed AS, Law PA, Chowdhury MA, Islam M, et al. Routine skin cultures in predicting sepsis pathogens among hospitalized preterm neonates in Bangladesh. Neonatology 2008;94:123-31.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Dobson SR, Isaacs D, Wilkinson AR, Hope PL. Reduced use of surface cultures for suspected neonatal sepsis and surveillance. Arch Dis Child 1992;67:44-7.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Phillips P, Cortina-Borja M, Millar M, Gilbert R. Risk-adjusted surveillance of hospital-acquired infections in neonatal intensive care units: a systematic review. J Hosp Infect 2008;70:203-11.   DOI   ScienceOn