Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7318/KJFC/2016.31.1.033

An Analysis on Nutrition Knowledge Level and Food Preference according to the Food-related Lifestyle Tendency - Focus on Housewives in the Seoul and Gyeonggi area -  

Lee, In Ork (Department of Hotel Food Service & Culinary Arts, Youngdong University)
Jung, So Yeoun (Department of Foodstylist, Chungkang College of Cultural Industries)
Hong, Geum Ju (Department of Hotel Foodservice Management, Chungwoon University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society of Food Culture / v.31, no.1, 2016 , pp. 33-41 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine the difference in nutritional knowledge and food preferences according to food-related lifestyle among 400 married women. Using the K-average clustering method, food-related lifestyles of subjects were categorized into three clusters: rational and diversity-oriented group, convenience-oriented group, and health-oriented group. The nutritional knowledge level and food preferences among three clusters were compared to each other using ANOVA test. The findings were summarized as follows: For the nutritional knowledge level, health-oriented group showed the highest mean score, whereas the lowest score was detected in the convenience-oriented group. The convenience-oriented group showed higher preferences for fish, meat, eggs, fruits, milk/dairy products, seaweed, grains, etc. among natural food than the other groups. Meanwhile, the rational and diversity-oriented group preferred legumes, and green vegetables, whereas the health-oriented group showed preferences for other vegetables. However, the convenience-oriented group reported more preferences for breads, noodles, pancakes, fried/stir-fried food, and processed food such as sausage, ham, and fast food, This study found that nutritional knowledge level and food preferences were significantly different according to food-related lifestyles of married women living in Seoul and Gyonggie areas. Thus, it is suggested that nutritional education targeting married women needs to be carefully designed by considering their food-related lifestyle.
Keywords
Food-related lifestyle; nutrition knowledge level; food preference according;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 4  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Na JK. 2005. Understanding Foodservice Industry. Baeksan publishing, Seoul, pp 238-239
2 Park YS, Lee JW, Seo JS, Lee BK, Lee HS. 2010. Nutrition education & counseling. Gyomoon publishers. Seoul 2
3 Song JJ. 2011. Statistical Analysis of spss/amos require for paper writing. 21cbook, kyonggi-do, pp 246-275
4 Korean society of food science and technology 2006. Food Science terminology dictionary. Kwangil publishing, kyonggi-do, p 146
5 Chaiy SI. 1992. Social Science Research Method and Analysis. Hakhyunsa, Seoul, p 230
6 Korea Rural Economic Institue. 2007. Analysis of Food Consumption Trend of Korean people. Report of research R560, p 15
7 Korea dictionary Research. 1996. Manual nursing practice, Korean academy of nursing
8 Cho YH. 2011. The mutual relationship and the level of the daycare center teacher and the mother about the eating habits, the nutritional knowledge and the nutritional attitude. Master's degree thesis, Sungshin Women's University, Korea, pp 17-19
9 Choi JE, Kim YG. 2012. The Relationship between University Students' Nutrition Knowledge, Dietary Self-efficacy, Dietary Habits and Menu Choice Behavior. J. Foodserv. Manag., 15(6):249-275
10 Chung LI. 2005. Analysis of consumer inclination to convenience towards home meal replacement in Korea. Ph.D. Dissertation, Yonsei University, Korea, pp1-4
11 Divine R, Lepisto L. 2005. Analysis of the Health Lifestyle Consumer. J. Consum. Mark., 22(5):275-283   DOI
12 Han AR. 2014. A Study on how the university students' patterns in food purchase according to their food lifestyle affects their purchasing behavior of convenience and processed food. Master's degree thesis, Nambu university, Korea, pp 103-108
13 Jang SH. 2010. An Investigation into Dietary Habit and Food Preference by University Student's Nutrition Knowledge. Master's degree thesis, Konkuk University, Korea, pp 16-17
14 Jin YH. 2001. Dietary behaviors of adults in Kimcheon city. J. Korean Soc. Food Cult., 16(1):43-57
15 Kwon YJ, Song HG, Kim JE. 2007. The influence of LOHAS tendency of dining-out consumers on wellness and ordering behavior of healthful menu. Korean J. Tour. Sci., 31(5):247-270
16 Kim BR, Cho YE. 2001. A study on the evaluation of food intake of middle school students in Kangneung. Korean J. Soc. Food Sci. Nutr., 30(5):986-992
17 Kim HY, Yang IS, Lee HY, Kang YH. 2003. The analysis of usage for nutritional information by junior and high school students in seoul. Korean J. Nutr., 36(9):960-965
18 Kim KH. 2003. A Study of the Dietary Habits, the Nutritional Knowledge and the Consumption Patterns of Convenience Foods of University Students in the Gwangju Area. Korean J. Community Nutr., 8(2):181-191
19 Lee KW, Chung HC, Cho MS. 2011. Sushi Consumption Behavior of Koreans according to Food-related Lifestyle Type among Consumers. J. Korean Soc. Food Cult., 26(6):574-582
20 Lee JH. 2012. A study about the effect of Kimchi purchasing selection features on purchasing intent by food-related lifestyles of women. J. Foodserv. Manag., 15(5):249-271
21 Kim JY, Ahn BI. 2015. Effect of Consumers' Dietary Lifestyle on the Consumption Pattern of Processed Foods. Korean J. Food Mark. Econ., 32(1):31-53.
22 Lee YJ. 2010. A Study of the Effects on a Healthy Dietary Life and Purchase of Environmental-Friendly Food Materials According to Mother's LOHAS Lifestyle Attitudes. J. Korean Soc. Food Cult., 25(6):708-718
23 O'Meara. 2000. Changing habits changing lives, Penguin Books, Australia, pp 67-70
24 Sin EK, Lee YK. 2005. Menu development and evaluation through eating behavior and food preference of preschool children in day-care centers. J. Korean Soc. Food Cult., 20(1):1-14
25 Steptoe A, Pollard T, Wardle J. 1995. Development of a measure of the motives underlying the selection of food: The food choice questionnaire. Appetite, 25(3):267-84   DOI