Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7318/KJFC.2008.23.5.605

Classification of Service Attributes and Strategic Customer Service Management based on the Asymmetric and Non-linear Relationship between Service Attributes and Customer Satisfaction  

Park, Jung-Young (KoreaEAP)
Lee, Gye-Hee (Department of Tourism Management, Kyung Hee University, College of Hotel & Tourism Management)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society of Food Culture / v.23, no.5, 2008 , pp. 605-615 More about this Journal
Abstract
The principal objective of this study was to categorize service attributes on the basis of the asymmetric and non-linear relationship existing between service attributes and customer satisfaction. Researchers generally assume that service attribute performances and customer satisfaction are both symmetrical and linear. That is to say, improvements in attribute performance will inevitably result in increased customer satisfaction. However, this is not always the case. Certain attributes have been shown not to create satisfaction even when improved, and others do not create dissatisfaction even when their performance ratings become negative. Understanding this relationship is crucial not only to researchers, but also to service managers. Service managers can arrange their priorities with regard to which attributes must be improved or promoted first, in an environment of limited technical, financial, and human resources. Many studies into this asymmetric and non-linear relationship have recently been conducted, beginning with Herzberg's motivation-hygiene theory (1976) and the disconfirmation theory, which was eventually developed into Kano's model (1984). This study attempted to determine the impact level of service attributes on incidents of satisfaction or dissatisfaction. It used 30 service attributes generated by Park (2008) in the CIT research into family restaurants. The data were collected from 600 participants, 300 incidences of satisfaction and 300 incidents of dissatisfaction, via an online survey. The t-test was used to confirm the difference between the satisfaction group's and dissatisfaction group's attributes. 11 attributes were found to be significant at a level of p>0.05. This indicates that the 11 attributes exerted different impacts on satisfaction and dissatisfaction, which confirmed the asymmetric and non-linear relationship. 14 attributes were categorized into the core service, 1 attribute into the quality service, 7 attributes into the basic service, and 8 attributes into the neutral service. Strategic customer service management was recommended for the 'A' family restaurant as an example, on the basis of the asymmetric and non-linear relationship and the characteristics of the four service factors.
Keywords
asymmetry; non-linear; core factor; quality factor; basic factor; neutral factor;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Chung SS. 2005. Effects of service recovery on consumers' satisfaction in the lodging industry. Ph. degree thesis. Kyungwon University. pp 70-88
2 Anderson EW, Sullivan MW. 1993. The antecedents and consequences of customer satisfaction for firms. Marketing Science, 12(Spring):125-143   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Brandt D Randall. 1988. How service marketers can identify valueenhancing service elements. The Journal of Service Marketing, 2(3):35-41   DOI
4 Flanagan JC. 1954. The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51:327-357   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Mittal V, Ross WT, Baldasare P. 1998. The asymmetric impact of negative and positive attribute-level performance on overall satisfaction and repurchase intentions. Journal of Marketing, 62:33-47   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Oliva TA, Oliver RL, Bearden WO. 1995. The relationship among consumer satisfaction, involvement, and product performance. Behavior Science, 40(April):104-132   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Oliver RL. 1980. A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(4):495-507
8 Tan Kay C, Pawitra Theresia A. 2001. Integrating SERVQUAL and Kano's model into QFD for service excellence development. Managing Service Quality, 11(6):418-430   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Fuller J, Matzler K, Faullant R. 2006. Asymmetric effects in customer satisfaction. Annals of Tourism Research, 33(4):1159-1163   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Park JY. 2001. An exploratory study on food service encounters- Using the critical incident technique. Ph. degree thesis. Kyonggi University. pp 61-100
11 Ting SC, Chen CN. 2002. The asymmetrical and non-linear effects of store quality attributes on customer satisfaction. Total Quality Management, 13(4):547-569   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Timko M. 1993. An experiment in continuous analysis. Center of Quality of Management Journal, 2(4):17-20
13 Deng Weijaw. 2007. Using a revised importance-performance analysis approach: The case of Taiwanese hot springs tourism. Tourism Management, 28:1274-1284   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Namkung Y, Jang S. 2007. Does food quality really matter in restaurants? Its impact on customer satisfaction and behavioral interntions, Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 31(3):387-410   DOI
15 Anderson EW, Mittal V. 2000. Strengthening the satisfaction-profit chain. Journal of Service Research, 3(2):107-120   DOI
16 Herzberg F. 1976. The Managerial Choice. Dow Hones-Irwin, Illinois. pp 58-67
17 Matzler K, Bailom F, Hinterjuber H, Renzl B, Pichler J. 2002. The asymmetric relationship between attribute-level performance and overall customer satisfaction: a reconsideration of the importance-performance analysis. Industrial Marketing Management, 33:271-277   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Matzler K, Hinterhuber H. 1998. How to make product development projects more successful by intergrating Kano's model of customer satisfaction into quality function deployment. Technovation, 18(1):25-38   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Cadotte ER, Turgeon N. 1988. Key factors in guest satisfaction. The Cornel Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 28:45-51
20 Johnston R, silvestro R. 1990. The determinants of service quality-a customer-basedapproach. The Prodeedings of the Decision Science Institute Conference, San Diego, CA. November
21 Johnston Robert. 1995. The determinants of service quality; satisfiers and dissatisfiers. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 6(5):53-71   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Bharadwaj S, Menon A. 1997. Discussion in applying the Kano Methodology to meet customer requirements: NASA's micro gravity science program. Quality Management Journal, 4(3):107-109
23 Kim YH. 2004. According to the service failures's types the effects of the perceived service recovery on the emotional response, the service value and the loyalty in the restaurant: A CIT approach. Ph. degree thesis. Sejong University. pp 130-139
24 Park JY. 2008. Core . quality . basic service factors of family restaurants and differentiation strategy for customer service management. Journal of the Korean Society of Food Culture, 23(2):184-193   과학기술학회마을
25 Lee HS. 2006. A study on the priority of selection determinants of family restaurant. Journal of Foodservice Management, 9(2):7-26
26 Kano N. 1984. Attractive quality and must be quality. Hinshitsu(Quality), 14(2):147-156
27 Kim JS. 2003. A study on the reaction between analysis for types of service failure, recovery and post recovery, availing CIT in the hotel industry. Ph. degree thesis. Dong-A University. pp 80-104