Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7318/KJFC.2007.22.5.645

The Effect of Dietary Ultra Finely Pulverized Rice Starch on Growth Performance and Development of Small Intestine  

Park, Jin-Hee (Department of Foods & Nutrition, Kookmin University)
Kim, Myung-Hwan (Department of Food Engineering, Dankook University)
Chang, Moon-Jeong (Department of Foods & Nutrition, Kookmin University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society of Food Culture / v.22, no.5, 2007 , pp. 645-651 More about this Journal
Abstract
Male weanling Sprague Dawley rats were used to evaluate the effect of dietary rice starch with different particle size on growth performance, intestinal function and proliferation. There were two dietary treatment: rice starch (RS), ultra finely pulverized rice starch with less than $15{\mu}m$ size (PRS). They were eight rats per treatment. In vitro digestibility, body weight change and organs weight were evaluated. Serum GPT, GOT and blood urea nitrogen were analyzed. Transit time, short chain fatty acid contents of cecum, and cell proliferation of duodenum and jejunum were measured. In vitro digestibility of PRS was higher than that of RS. Rats fed ultra finely pulverized rice starch for 3 weeks grew faster than rats fed rice starch. PRS group has higher weights of liver, kidney, spleen and epididymal fat pad, perhaps as a result of increased digestibility. GPT and GOT were not different between two groups. Blood urea nitrogen was higher in RS-fed rats than that of PRS-fed rats. Feeding ultra finely pulverized rice starch resulted in a proliferation of duodenum significantly. These results suggest that ultra finely pulverized rice starch increases the growth performance in weanling animals with reduced number of cells in the cell cycle of small intestine.
Keywords
ultra finely pulverized rice starch; growth performance; gut function;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Englyst HN, Cummings JH, 1985 Digestion of the polysaccharides of some cereal foods in the human small intestine. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 42: 778-787   DOI
2 Krog N, Olesen SK, Toemases H, Joensson T. 1989. Retrogradation of the starch fraction in wheat bread. Cereal Foods World 34: 281-285
3 Liu H, Harold C, Ramsden L. Functional properties and enzymatic digestibility of cationic and cross-linked cationic ae.wx. and normal maize starch. 1999. J. Agric. Food Chem. 47: 2523-2528   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Medel P, Salado S, , de Blas JC, Mateos GG. 1999. Processed cereals in diets for early-weaned piglets. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 82: 145-156   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Kim SY, Lee SR, In vitro digestibility of chemically modified starches and ramen starches. 1994. Kor. J. Food Sci. Technol. 26: 475-478   과학기술학회마을
6 Yanai T, Matsumoto C, Takashima H, Yoshida K, Sakai H, Isowa K, Iwasaki T, Sato Y, Masegi T. 1996. Immunohistochemical demonstration of S-phase cells by antibromodeoxyuridine monoclonal antibody in cattle tissues. J. Comp. Path. 114: 265-272   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Englyst HN. Cummings JH. 1990. Non-starch polysaccharides (dietary fibre) and resistant starch. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 270: 205-225
8 Patridge GG, Gill BP. 1993. New approaches with pig weaner diets: In: Garnsworthy PC, Cole DJA (Eds) Recent advances in animal nutrition. Nottingham University Press. UK. pp 221-248
9 Carre B, Idi A, Maisonnier S, Melcion J-P, Oury F-X, Gomez J, Pluchard P. 2002. Relationships between digestibilities of food components and characteristics of wheats (Triticum aestivum) introduced as the only cereal source in a broiler diet. Br. Poultry Sci. 43: 404-415   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Hoebler C, Karinthi A, Chiron H, Champ M, Barry JL. 1999. Bioavailability of starch in bread rich in amylose: metabolic responses in healthy subjects and starch structure. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 53: 360-366   DOI
11 Williams BA, Verstegen MWA, Tamminga S. 2001. Fermentation in the large intestine of single-stomached animals and its relationship to animal health. Nutr. Res. Rev. 14: 207-227   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Reville M, Grosse F, Kachellhoffer J, Doffoel, M, Raul F. 1991. Ileal compensation for age-dependent loss of jejunal function in rats. J. Nutr. 121: 498-503   DOI
13 Jenkins DJ, Wolever TM, Taylor RH, Baker H, Fielder H, Baldwin JM, Bowling AC, Newman HC, Jenkins AL, Goff DV. 1981. Glycemic index of foods: a phsyiological basis for carbohydrate exchange. Am. J Clin. Nutr. 34: 362-366   DOI
14 Aumaitre A, Peiniau J, Madec F. 1995. Digestive adaptation after weaning and nutritional consequences in the piglet. Pig News Inf. 16: 73N-79N
15 COMA Committee on Medical Aspects of Food Policy. 1994. Weaning and the weaning diet. Rep. Health Soc. Subj. 45 : 1-113
16 Zabielski R, Le Huerou-Luron I, Guilloteau P. 1999. Development of gastrointestinal and pancreatic functions in mammalians(mainly bovine and porcine species): influence of age and ingested food. Reprod. Nutr. Dev. 39: 5-26   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Stephen M-M, van Camp J, Mamiro PRS, Ooghe W, Kolsteren P, Huyghebaert A. 2002. Evaluation of the nutritional characteristics of a finger millet based complementary food. J. Agric. Food Chem. 50: 3030-3036   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Le Blay G, Michel C, Blottiere HM, Cherbut C. 1999. Enhancement of butyrate production in the rat caecolonic tract by long-term ingestion of resistant potato starch. Br. J. Nutr. 82: 419-426   DOI
19 Svihus B, Uhlen AK, Harstad OM. 2005. Effect of starch granule structure, associated components and processing on nutritive value of cereal starch: A review. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 122: 303-320   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Grand RJ, Watkins JB, Torti FM. 1976. Development of the human gastrointestinal tract: a review. Gastroenterology 70: 790-810
21 Wiseman J. Variations in starch digestibility in non-ruminants. 2006. Anim. Feed Sci . Technol. 130: 66-77   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Sangild PT. 2006. Gut responses to enteral nutrition in preterm infants and animals. Exp. Biol. Med. 231: 1695-1711   DOI
23 Schutte B, Reynders MMJ. Bosman FT, Blijham GH. 1987. Studies with antibromodeoxyuridine antibodies II: Simultaneous immunocytochemical detection of antigen expression and DNA synthesis by in vivo labeling of mouse intestinal mucosa. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 35: 371-374   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Stephen AM, Haddad AC, Phillips SF. 1983. Passage of carbohydrate into the colon. Direct measurements in humans. Gastroenterology 85: 589-595
25 Bjorck I, Gunnarsson A, Ostergard K. 1989. A study of native and chemically modified potato starch II. : Digestibility in the rat intestinal tract. Starch-Starke 41: 128-134   DOI
26 Medel P, Garcia M, Lazaro R, de Blas C, Mateos GG. 2000. Particle size and heat treatment of barley in diets for earlyweaned piglets. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 84: 13-21   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Chang MJ, Kim MH. 2003. Comparative growth performance and physiological function of physically modified rice starch and gelatinized rice starch in growing rats. Kor. J. Food Cult. 18: 592-600   과학기술학회마을
28 Berry CS 1986. Resistant starch: formation and measurement of starch that survives exhaustive digestion with amylolytic enzymes during the determination of dietary fibre. J. Cereal Sci. 4: 301-314   DOI
29 Brunsgaard G, Bach-Knudsen KE, Eggum BO. 1995. The influence of the period of adaptation on the digestibility of diets containing different types of indigestible polysaccharides in rats. Br. J. Nutr. 74: 833-848   DOI   ScienceOn
30 Vestergaard EM, Danielsen V, Jacobsen EE, Rasmussen V. 1990. Heat treated cereals for piglets. Statens Husdyrbrugsforsoeg, Foulum 674: 71
31 Würsch P, del Vedovo S, Kroellreutter B. 1986. Cell structure and starch nature as key determinant of the digestion rate of starch in legumes. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 43: 25-29   DOI