Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.13000/JFMSE.2016.28.6.1602

Risk Assessment for Retrofitting a Ballast Water Treatment System on an Exising Vessel  

JEE, Jae-Hoon (Korean Register of Shipping)
OH, Cheol (Korea Maritime and Ocean University)
Publication Information
Journal of Fisheries and Marine Sciences Education / v.28, no.6, 2016 , pp. 1602-1613 More about this Journal
Abstract
Since Ballast Water Management Convention has been adopted, Ballast Water Management Convention is not effected yet. This convention will only enter into force 12 months after its ratification by 30 states, collectively representing 35% of world merchant shipping tonnnage. Morocco, Indonesia and Ghana have ratified this convention during last 29th IMO Assembly meeting which was held in November 2015. In 2016, Belgium, Fiji, Saint Lucia and Peru have become the latest countries to ratify the convention. As of now, 51 states and 34.87% combined merchant fleets are being calculated. BWM convention will be applied to not only new ships but also, existing ships after it is effected. Thus, existing vessel will be retrofitted a Ballast Water Treatment System according to D-2 Requirement until first IOPP nenewal survey after date of entry into force of the convention. Currently, about 65 BWTSs certified by Administration will be reported to IMO, even type of BWTSs is very various. Thus, a risk of each BWTS can be existed, and this existed risk can be also effected to ship's crew safety and protection of ship's own property. Therefore, we have evaluated a risk assessment for an existing vessel retrofitting an ultra violet type Ballast Water Treatment System which is mostly developed in the world. And we described the procedure of selecting a sample vessel, consequently, bulk carrier is selected because this vessel kind is mostly charged in the world. Especially, DWT 175K size is selected. Risk Assessment is using a HAZID and HAZOP method, evaluation method is referred to IMO Document "Considerated test of the Guidelines for Formal Safety Assessment (FSA) for use in the IMO rule-marking process(MSC/Circ.1203-MEPC/Circ.392)". The Risk Assessment Section is decided to 3 Nodes, Consequently, total risks have evaluated 51 items.
Keywords
Ballast Water Treatment System; Ultra Violet; Bulk Carrier; Risk Assessment;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Banerji. S. Werschkun. B. Hofer. T.(2012). "Assessing the risk of ballast water treatment to human health", Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology, 62(3), 513-522   DOI
2 International Maritime Organization(2015). "List of ballast water management systems that make use of Active Substances which received Basic and Final Approval, BWM.2/Circ.34/Rev.4" 2-13.
3 IMO.(2015). Considerated test of the Guidelines for Formal Safety Assessment(FSA) for use in the IMO rule-marking process(MSC/Circ.1023 MEPC/Circ.392)
4 Korean Register of Shipping(2016). "Briefings of IMO Meeting MEPC 69", 1-2.
5 Korean Register of Shipping(2010) "Guideline for Retrofitting BWTS for Ships" 32-46.
6 Kim, E. C.(2012). "Consideration on the Ballast Water Treatment System Technology and its Development Strategies", Korean of Society Marine Environment and Energy, 15(4), 349-356   DOI
7 Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology (2008). "Research and Development of Technology to Prepare for controlling Ship's Ballast", 68.
8 Moon. K. T. et al. "The Study on Risk and Redundancy Assessment Methodology of Ship Machinery System", Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea, 47(1), 76-87
9 "Number of ships in the world merchant fleet as of January 1, 2015 by type", http://www.statista.com http://www.imo.org/en/OurWork/Environment/Ballast WaterManagement/Documents/BWM.2-CIRC.34-REV .4.pdf