Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.13000/JFMSE.2015.27.1.125

A Study on the Strategy of Performance Assessment based on Classroom  

Won, Hyo-Heon (Pukyong National University)
Heo, Gyun (Pukyong National University)
Publication Information
Journal of Fisheries and Marine Sciences Education / v.27, no.1, 2015 , pp. 125-132 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to search the concept and meaning of performance assessment(PA) in the classroom, and the to proposed some strategies to apply PA. The result of this study was presented below. First, differentiation strategy is necessary in the evaluation goal. Individualization will be an example of differentiation strategy in the evaluation of group goal. Second, various strategies are needed based on the subjects of evaluation. Self-evaluation, peer-evaluation, and small group-evaluation are some examples evaluation for the subjects. Third, there is a need for phase-strategy assessment. For the class associated performance assessment, we have to consider the evaluation activities based on the time likes before (pre), on, and after class. How to select the evaluation task is also one of the key sucess factors for improving the class associated performance assessment.
Keywords
Performance Assessment; Classroom Evaluation; Evaluation Strategy;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Berk, R. A.(1986). Performance assessment: methods & applications, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
2 Choi, H. S.(1999). Obstructive factor analysis & improvement plan of curriculum & performance assessment, Korean Journal of Educational Research, 38(1), 153-184.
3 Dewey, J.(1938). Experience and education, NY: Collier Books.
4 Jonassen, D. H.(1991). Evaluating constructivist learning, Educational Technology, 31(9), 28-33.
5 Kolb D. A.(1984). Experiential Learning experience as a source of learning and development, NJ: Prentice Hall.
6 McTighe J. & Ferrara S.(1994). Assessing learning in the classroom, Washington,D.C: National Education Association.
7 Nam, M. H.(1995). Research on validity of performance assessment, Doctoral Paper in Korea University.
8 Park, C.(2014). Formative assessment and teacher education, Journal of Educational Evaluation, 27(4), 987-1007.
9 Park, S. M.(1998). A theoretical and practical linkage between constructivism and performance assessment, Social Studies Education, 31, 339-356.
10 Phye, G. D.(1997). Handbook of classroom assessment: learning, adjustment, and achievement, CA: Academic Press.
11 Scriven, M.(1967). The methodology of evaluation. In R. W. Tyler, R. Gagne, & M. Scriven(Eds.) Perspectives on Curricular Evaluation, AERA Monograph Series on Curriculum Evaluation. No.1, pp.39-83. Chicago: Rand McNally.
12 Seong, T. J. Im, H. J.(2014). Suggestions for teacher's perception and applicable method through the new understanding of formative assessment, Journal of Educational Evaluation, 27(3), 597-615
13 Stiggins, R. J.(1994). Student-centered classroom assessment, NY: Macmillan Publishing Company.
14 Stiggins, R. (2005). From formative assessment to assessment FOR learning: A path to success in standards-based schools, Phi Delta Kappan, 87(4), 324-328.   DOI
15 Won, H. H.(2014). Suggestions for improvement of performance assessment according to achievement evaluation, The Journal of Fisheries and Marine Science Education, 26(1), 203-213.   DOI