1 |
간진숙․금미숙․이칭찬(2012). 수분별 유아수업 설계모형이 유아교사의 전문성 발달에 미치는 효과, 수산해양교육연구 24(1), 56-78.
|
2 |
김달효(2006). 능력별 집단편성의 비판적 이해, 서울: 시그마프레스.
|
3 |
김달효(2007). 능력별 집단편성에 대한 교사와 학생의 인식, 수산해양교육연구 19(3), 390-402.
|
4 |
김달효(2008). 학생의 능력별 집단편성에 따른 관련 변인의 차이 분석, 중등교육연구 56(2), 1-22.
|
5 |
김영철 등(1995). 고등학교 평준화 정책의 개선방안, 한국교육개발원.
|
6 |
김태균(2007). 수준별 이동 수업이 학생들의 수학적 성향과 수학성취도에 미치는 효과, 중앙대학교 석사학위논문.
|
7 |
김홍원 등(2004). 수준별 이동수업 내실화 방안연구, 한국교육개발원 연구보고서.
|
8 |
박소영(2001). 중학교 수준별 수업 운영 실태에 관한 교사 인식 조사, 교육과정연구 19(2), 한국교육과정학회, 95-117.
|
9 |
박소영(2004). 수준별 교육과정의 운영 실태와 개선 방안 연구, 수산해양교육연구 16(1), 21-34.
|
10 |
박현애(2008). 수준별 이동수업에 관한 학생과 교사들의 인식에 대한 연구, 목포대학교 석사학위논문.
|
11 |
배정애(2001). 중학교 수준별 교육에 대한 교사․학생의 인식 비교․분석, 경성대학교 석사학위논문.
|
12 |
성기선.강태중(2001). 평준화 정책과 지적 수월성 교육의 관계에 대한 실증적 검토, KEDI 교육정책포럼-한국교육의 현실과 대안(2), 한국교육개발원.
|
13 |
원영심(2008). 집단의 크기를 달리한 수준별 이동수업 효과 분석, 건국대학교 석사학위논문.
|
14 |
원효헌․김명생(2009). 중학교 수학과 특별보충과정이 학생의 정의적 특성에 미치는 효과 분석, 수산해양교육연구 21(1), 151-161.
|
15 |
정미경(2000). 수준별 수업과 교육기회의 평등화문제, 교육과정연구 18(1), 275-297.
|
16 |
중앙교육진흥연구소(2001). 일반계 고등학교의 학교별 교육효과 분석, 중앙교육진흥연구소.
|
17 |
황희숙․김주안(2000). 협동기술을 적용한 구성주의적 수업의 효과 분석, 수산해양교육연구 12(2), 102-121.
|
18 |
Boaler, J., William, D., & Brown, M.(2000). Students' experiences of ability grouping: disaffection, polarization and the construction of failure, British Educational Research Journal 26(5), 631-648.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
19 |
Clammer, R.(1985). Mixed ability teaching: meanings and motives, A study of two geography departments, SERCH, 7, 17-19.
|
20 |
Cole, M., & Griffin, P.(1987). Contextual factors in education: improving science and mathematics education for minorities and women, Madison, WI: Wisconsin Center for Education Research.
|
21 |
Dawson, M. M.(1987). Beyond ability grouping: a review of the effectiveness of ability grouping and its alternatives, School Psychology Review 16(3), 348-369.
|
22 |
Eder, D.(1981). Ability grouping as a selffulfilling prophecy : a micro-analysis of teacherstudent interaction, Sociology of Education, 54, 151-162.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
23 |
Ekstrom, R. B., & Villegas, A. M.(1991). Ability grouping in middle grade mathematics: processes and consequences, Research in Middle Level Education 15(1), 1-20.
DOI
|
24 |
Esposito, D.(1973). Homogeneous and heterogeneous ability grouping: principal findings and implications for evaluating and designing more effective educational environments, Review of Education Research 43(2), 163-179.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
25 |
Finley, M. K.(1984). Teachers and tracking in a comprehensive high school, Sociology of Education, 57, 233-243.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
26 |
Gamoran, A., & Berends, M.(1987). The effects of stratification in secondary schools: synthesis of survey and ethnographic research, Review of Educational Research 57, 415-435.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
27 |
Gene, S.(1995). NASSP Bulletin, Feb. 79, 18-19.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
28 |
George, P. S.(1993). Tracking and ability grouping in the middle school: ten tentative truths, Middle School Journal 24, 17-24.
DOI
|
29 |
Good, T. L.(1981). Teacher expectations and student perceptions: a decade of research, Educational Leadership 38, 415-427.
|
30 |
Goldberg, M. L., Passow, A. H., & Justman, J.(1966). The effects of ability grouping, New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.
|
31 |
Good, T. L., & Marshall, S.(1984). Do students learn more in heterogeneous group? In. S. W. Raudenbush, & J. D. Williams.(eds). The social context of instruction : group organization and group processes, New York: Academic Press.
|
32 |
Hallinan, M. T., & Sorensen, A.(1985). Ability grouping and student friendship, American Educational Research 22(4), 485-499.
|
33 |
Ireson, J., & Hallam, S.(2001). Ability grouping in education, London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
|
34 |
Kulik, C. C., & Kulik, J. A.(1984). Effects of ability grouping on elementary school pupils: a meta-analysis, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, August, 24-28.
|
35 |
Kulik, C. C., & Kulik, J. A.(1990). Effectiveness of mastery learning programmes : a metaanalysis, Review of Educational Research 60, 265-299.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
36 |
Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C. C.(1992). Meta-analytic findings on grouping programs, Gifted Child Quarterly 36(2), 73-77.
DOI
|
37 |
Loveless, T.(1999). The tracking wars, Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
|
38 |
Oakes, J.(1985). Keeping track: how schools structure inequality, New York: Yale University Press.
|
39 |
Oakes, J., Gamoran, A., & Page, R.(1992). Curriculum differentiation: opportunities, consequences and meaning, In P. Jackson, (ed). Handbook of research on curriculum, New York: Macmillan.
|
40 |
Page, R.(1992). Lower track classrooms: a curricular and cultural perspective, New York: Teachers College Press.
|
41 |
Slavin, R. E.(1989). Class size and student achievement : small effects of small classes, Educational Psychologist 24(1), 99-100.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
42 |
Wheelock, A.(1994). Alternatives to tracking and ability grouping, American Association of School Administrators, Arlington. VA.
|
43 |
Slavin, R. E.(1990). Ability grouping and student achievement in secondary schools: a best evidence synthesis, Review of Educational Research 60, 471-499.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
44 |
Slavin, R. E., & Braddock, J. H. III.(1993). Ability grouping: on the wrong track, The College Board Review 168, 11-18.
|
45 |
Watson, S. B., & Marshall, J. E.(1995). Heterogeneous grouping as an element of cooperative learning in an elementary education science course, School Science & Mathematics 95(8), 401-408.
DOI
|
46 |
Yair, G.(1997). Teachers' polarization in heterogeneous classrooms and the social distribution of achievement: an Israeli case study, Teaching and Teacher Education 13(3), 279-293.
DOI
ScienceOn
|