Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.12939/FBA.2017.48.3.015

A Study on the Application of International Law through Disputes Settlement in Northeast Asia Fishing Ground  

Lee, Woo-Do (The Busan KyungSang University)
Kim, Nam-Soo (The Korean Association of Asset Management)
Lee, Jin-Soo (Pukyong National University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Fisheries Business Administration / v.48, no.3, 2017 , pp. 15-32 More about this Journal
Abstract
This article's aim is to review the jurisprudence which has emerged pursuant to the international dispute settlement provisions and to provide a provisional expectation as to the future of international dispute settlement under "UNCLOS". Globally, marine fisheries play an important role in ocean biodiversity and the food security of millions of people, providing a vital source of high-quality dietary protein and supporting individuals' livelihoods and income. In the 1982 Convention, the establishment of co-operative mechanisms for effective monitoring, control, surveillance and enforcement, decision-making procedures facilitating the adoption of such measures of conservation and management, and the promotion of the peaceful settlement of disputes are called for. In this study, 'Northeast Asian Sea' means that the Yellow/East China Sea, the East Sea, the Ohotsk Sea, the Kamchaka Sea, the Alaska Sea, and the Bering Sea surrounded by Korea, China, Japan, Russia, U.S.A. and Canada including their EEZs. There are several bilateral fisheries agreements existing in Northeast Asian area, the Fisheries Agreement between Republic Korea and Japan, between Republic of Korea and China, between China and Japan, between Republic Korea and U.S.A., between Republic Korea and Russia, between Russia and Japan, And there are several regional fisheries organizations existing in Northeast Asian area, for example NPAFC(Convention for the Conservation of Anadromous Stocks in the North Pacific Ocean), CBSPC (Convention on the Central Bering Sea Pollack Conservation), PICES(North Pacific Marine Science Organization), NPFC(North Pacific Fishery Commi-ssion) etc. It analyzed the proliferation of bilateral treaties and multilateral treaties due to the adoption of the EEZ in Northeast Asia reviewed the strengthening of management rights on the high seas marine living resources and marine environment preservation of regional fisheries organizations. In view of the changes in the international fisheries mechanism this paper suggested the future direction of the country in overseas fisheries. We concluded as follows. We shall apply bilateral treaties first, regional fisheries organizations' treaties secondly, and provisions under "UNCLOS" for dispute settlement last.
Keywords
EEZ; marine fisheries; UN Convention; International Fisheries Regime; Northeast Asia;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 구민교 (2011),"지속가능한 동북아시아 해양질서의 모색:우리나라의 해양정책과 그 정책적 함의를 중심으로", 국제.지역연구, 20 (2).
2 김대영 (2014),"한중어업질서의 진단 및 양국 어업관계의 개선방향", 수산경영론집, 45 (3).
3 김민서.이기범 (2016),"UN해양법협약상 강제관할권에 관한 연구", 나라정책연구소 연구보고서.
4 김민종 (2003),"북양트롤선 DIKO호 사건과 미국의 재판절차에 대한 고찰", 해양수산연구, 18 (1).
5 김찬규.노명준.이창위 (1999),"한일어업협정 및 한중어업협정 체결 이후 동북아의 어업질서 운영방안", 국제법학회논총, 44 (1).
6 김현수 (2011),"지역수산관리기구의 분쟁해결제도", 해사법연구, 23 (2).
7 이석용 (2016),"해양생물자원 보호를 위한 국제어업법 변화 연구", 과학기술법연구, 22 (1).
8 이진규 (2010),"유엔해양법협약 상 강제적 분쟁해결제도에 관한 소고", 분쟁해결연구, l8 (1).
9 이창위 (1999),"동북아지역의 새 어업협정체제와 중간수역에 대한 고찰", 국제법학회논총, 44 (1).
10 이창위 (2002),"새로운 어업질서와 동북아지역의 해양경제", 해사법연구.
11 정일영 (2001),"일본 국내법원의 한국어선 대동호 및 만구호 사건 판결문", 국제법학논총, 45 (3).
12 정해웅 (2014),"유엔해양법협약과 동북아해양법질서", 유엔해양법발효 20주년 기념 심포지엄, 국제해양법학회, 한국해양과학기술원.
13 최종화 (2008), 현대국제해양법, 제6 전정판, 두남.
14 해양수산부 (2002), 한중어업협정에 관한 연구.
15 해양수산부 (2002), 해양한국발전 프로그램(KSGP)연구개발사업 연구보고서.
16 홍승용,"새 어업질서에 대비하자/洪承湧한국해양수산개발원장(한국시론)", 한국일보. 1998.11.16. : http://www.hankookilbo.com/v/16048cb1428a4e59b6679da62213e567.
17 ITLOS (2007), Application for the Prompt Release of a Vessel, in ITLOS, The 53th Tominmaru (Japan v. Russian Federation, 6 July, 2007), para.12.
18 ITLOS (2007), The"Hoshinmaru"Case(Japan v. Russian Federation), Judgement of International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, List of cases: No. 14, 6 August 2007, para.27.
19 ITLOS (2007), Application for the Prompt Release of a Vessel and its Crew in ITLOS, The 88th Hoshinmaru(Japan v. Russian Federation, 6 July, 2007), Annex 4.
20 ITLOS (2007), The"Hoshinmaru"Case(Japan v. Russian Federation), Judgement of International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, List of cases: No. 14, 6 August 2007, para.1.
21 ITLOS (2007), The"TOMIMARU"Case(Japan v. Russian Federation), Judgement of International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, List of cases: No. 15, 6 August 2007, para.1.
22 ITLOS (2007), The"TOMIMARU"Case(Japan v. Russian Federation), Judgement of International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, List of cases: No. 15, 6 August 2007, para.22.
23 Rayfuse, R. (2005),"The Future of Compulsory Dispute Settlement under the Law of the Sea Convention,"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review, 36.
24 Yoshifumi, T. (2015), The International Law of the Sea, 2nd ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.