Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.12939/FBA.2012.43.2.079

The Study on the Comparative Analysis of the Aquaculture Production Efficiency Regarding Methods and Species  

Park, Cheol-Hyung (부경대학교 자원경제학과)
Publication Information
The Journal of Fisheries Business Administration / v.43, no.2, 2012 , pp. 79-94 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to investigate the production efficiencies of the Korean aquaculture fishery with respect to species and methods using a Data Envelopment Analysis. The study extracted the 8 fishes in each of the sea cage culture, aquarium basin, and enclosed aquaculture for the analytical purposes. First, the study estimated the technical, pure technical, and scale efficiencies of the total of 24 aquaculture fishes based on the traditional DEA under the assumptions of both CRS and VRS. 2 fishes were identified as the efficient DMUs under the CCR-model, and 6 fishes under the BCC-model. Second, we tested to see if there was any difference in production efficiencies regarding those three different methods of aquaculture. we could not find any evidence of the differences in efficiency using a rank sum test based on the traditional DEA. However, we could do find that the pure technical efficiency in the sea cage culture was lower than others at 1% level of significance and the pure technical efficiency in enclosed aquaculture was also lower than others at 5% level of significance using Bilateral-DEA, which could explicitly consider the heterogeneity in the 3 production methods of aquaculture. Finally, the study obtained the 95% confidence intervals of the efficiency scores for the 24 fishes under our study using the smoothed bootstraping method in the process of the re-sampling in cooperation with both a kernel density estimation and a reflection method. At the same time, we could estimate the bias-corrected efficiency scores while the traditionally estimated efficiency scores suffered from the biases in the process of solving a linear programming with the deterministic nature of a production frontier. And hence, we could distinguish the differences in production efficiencies of the 8 fishes with respect to those 3 methods of aquaculture.
Keywords
DEA; CCR; BCC; Bilateral-DEA; Bootstrap-DEA;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 4  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 김도훈," 우리나라 근해어업의 어획능력 측정에 관한 연구", 수산경영론집, 제37권 제1호, 2006, pp.1 -24.
2 김도훈. 서주남. 이상고," Technical efficiency of the coastal composite fishery in Korea : a comparison of data envelopment analysis and stochastic frontier analysis", 수산경영론집, 제41권 제3호, 2010, pp.45-58.
3 김재희," 교차효율분석을 활용한 원양어업의 업종별 경쟁력 추정", 해양정책연구, 제24권 제1호, 2009, pp.57-76.
4 박철형," Super-SBM을 이용한 어항의 효율성분석에 관한 연구", 수산경영론집, 제41권 제3호, 2010, pp.129-152.
5 박철형. 최치훈, " DEA를 이용한 수산양식업 효율성의 비교분석에 관한 연구", 한국도서연구, 제24권 제1호, 2012, pp.33-49.
6 서주남. 송정헌," 해조류 양식업 규모의 효율성 추정에 관한 연구-부산 기장지역 미역양식을 중심으로-", 수산경영론집, 제40권 제1호, 2009, pp.1-26.
7 유금록," 부트스트랩 자료포락분석에 의한 공공부문의 효율성과 결정요인의 경험적 평가 : 서울시 보건소를 중심으로", 한국정책학회보, 제17권 제2호, 2008, pp.291-321.
8 이강우," DEA모형에 의한 지역수협의 경영평가", 수산경영론집, 제42권 제2호, 2011, pp.15-30.
9 최정윤. 남수현. 강석규," 한국수산업협동조합의 경영효율성 평가 : 자료포락분석", 수산경영론집, 제34권 제2호, 2003, pp.109-130.
10 표희동. 김종천," 수산물 도매업의 생산 효율성 평가에 관한 연구", 수산경영론집, 제41권 제3호, 2010, pp.21-44.
11 Banker, R. D., A. Charness and W. W. Cooper," Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis," Management Science, 30, 1984, pp.1078-1092.
12 Cooper W. W., Seiford L. M., and Tone K., Data Envelopment Analysis, Kluver Academic Publishers, 2000.
13 Efron, B." Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife," Annals of Statistics, 7, 1979, pp.1-26.
14 Silverman, B. W.," Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis," London, Chapman and Hall, 1986.
15 Simar, L. & Wilson, P. W.," Sensitivity Analysis of Efficiency Scores: How to Bootstrap in Nonparametric Frontier Models," Management Science, 44, 1998, pp.49-61.
16 Simar, L. & Wilson, P. W.," Estimating and Bootstrapping Malmquist Indices," European Journal of Operational Research, 115, 1999, pp.459-471.
17 Simar, L. & Wilson, P. W.," Statistical Inference in Nonparametric Frontier Models: The State of the Art," Journal of Productivity Analysis, 13, 2000, pp.49-78.
18 Simar, L. & Wilson, P. W.," A General Methodology for Bootstrapping Nonparametric Frontier Models," Journal of Applied Statistics, 27, 2000, pp.779-802.