1 |
Aguirre A, Vallejo-Marin M, Piedra-Malagon EM, Cruz-Ortega R, Dirzo R. 2009. Morphological variation in the flowers of Jacaratia mexicana A. DC. (Caricaceae), a subdioecious tree. Plant Biol (Stuttg) 11: 417-424.
DOI
|
2 |
Agwu OP, Bakayoko A, Bolanle-Ojo OT, Jimoh SO, Stefan P. 2018. Influence of Climate, Seed Sizes and Land Use Types on the Germination and Early Growth of Garcinia kola and Cola nitida in Nigeria. Agri Res Tech 19: 556083.
|
3 |
Ashman TL. 2000. Pollinator selectivity and its implications for the evolution of dioecy and sexual dimorphism. Ecology 81: 2577-2591.
DOI
|
4 |
Ashman TL, Diefenderfer C. 2001. Sex ratio represents a unique context for selection on attractive traits: consequences for the evolution of sexual dimorphism. Am Nat 157: 334-347.
DOI
|
5 |
Assouad MW, Dommee B, Lumaret R, Valdeyron G. 1978. Reproductive capacities in the sexual forms of the gynodioecious species Thymus vulgaris L. Bot J Linn Soc 77: 29-39.
DOI
|
6 |
Barrett SC, Hough J. 2013. Sexual dimorphism in flowering plants. J Exp Bot 64: 67-82.
DOI
|
7 |
Bawa KS, Beach JH. 1981. Evolution of Sexual Systems in Flowering Plants. Ann Mo Bot Gard 68: 254-274.
DOI
|
8 |
Bertin RI. 1982. The evolution and maintenance of andromonoecy. Evol Theory 6: 25-32.
|
9 |
Cepeda-Cornejo V, Dirzo R. 2010. Sex-related differences in reproductive allocation, growth, defense and herbivory in three dioecious neotropical palms. PLoS One 5: e9824.
|
10 |
Charlesworth B. 1991. The evolution of sex chromosomes. Science 251: 1030-1033.
DOI
|
11 |
Charlesworth B, Charlesworth D. 1978a. A Model for the Evolution of Dioecy and Gynodioecy. Am Nat 112: 975-997.
DOI
|
12 |
Charlesworth D. 2002. Plant sex determination and sex chromosomes. Heredity 88: 94-101.
DOI
|
13 |
Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B. 1978b. Population genetics of partial male-sterility and the evolution of monoecy and dioecy. Heredity 41: 137-153.
DOI
|
14 |
Costich DE, Meagher TR, 2001. Impacts of floral gender and whole-plant gender on floral evolution in Ecballium elaterium (Cucurbitaceae). Biol J Linn Soc 74: 475-487.
DOI
|
15 |
Delph LF. 1996. Flower size dimorphism in plants with unisexual flowers. In: Floral Biology: Studies on Floral Evolution in Animal-Pollinated Plants (Lloyd DG, Barrett SCH, eds). Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 217-237.
|
16 |
Delph LF, Ashman TL. 2006. Trait selection in flowering plants: how does sexual selection contribute? Integr Comp Biol 46: 465-472.
DOI
|
17 |
Delph LF, Galloway LF, Stanton ML. 1996. Sexual Dimorphism in Flower Size. Am Nat 148: 299-320.
DOI
|
18 |
Eckhart VM. 1999. Sexual dimorphism in flowers and inflorescences. In: Gender and Sexual Dimorphism in Flowering Plants (Geber MA, Dawson TE, Delph LF, eds). Springer, New York, pp 123-148.
|
19 |
Fenster CB, Carr DE. 1997. Genetics of sex allocation in Mimulus (Scrophulariaceae). J Evol Biol 10: 641-661.
DOI
|
20 |
George ST, Latha AKB, Mathew KL, Geetha CK. 1992. Pattern of flowering and flower development in kodapuli (Garcinia cambogia Desr.). Indian Cocoa Arecanut Spices J 16: 68-70.
|
21 |
Harder LD, Barrett SCH. 1996. Pollen dispersal and mating patterns in animal-pollinated plants. In: Floral Biology: Studies on Floral Evolution in Animal-Pollinated Plants (Lloyd DG, Barrett SCH, eds). Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 140-190.
|
22 |
Humeau L, Pailler T, Thompson J. 2003. Flower size dimorphism in diclinous plants native to La Reunion Island. Plant Syst Evol 240: 163-173.
DOI
|
23 |
Isawumi AM. 1993. The common edible fruits of Nigeria, Part II. Niger Field 58: 1-2.
|
24 |
Lloyd DG. 1975. Breeding Systems in Cotula. III. Dioecious Populations. New Phytol 74: 109-123.
DOI
|
25 |
Joseph KS, Murthy HN. 2015. Sexual system of Garcinia indica Choisy: geographic variation in trioecy and sexual dimorphism in floral traits. Plant Syst Evol 301: 1065-1071.
DOI
|
26 |
Keay RWJ, Onochie CFA, Stanfield DP. 1964. Nigerian Trees. Department of Forest Research, Ibadan.
|
27 |
Leal DO, Benevides CR, Silva RCP, Santiago-Fernandes LDR, Sa-Haiad B, Lima HA. 2013. Garcinia brasiliensis: insights into reproductive phenology and sexual system in a Neotropical environment. Plant Syst Evol 299: 1577-1585.
DOI
|
28 |
Manourova A, Leuner O, Tchoundjeu Z, Van Damme P, Verner V, Pribyl O, Lojka B. 2019. Medicinal Potential, Utilization and Domestication Status of Bitter Kola (Garcinia kola Heckel) in West and Central Africa. Forests 10: 124.
|
29 |
Morgan M. 1993. Fruit to flower ratios and trade-offs in size and number. Evol Ecol 7: 219-232.
DOI
|
30 |
Nicolas M, Marais G, Hykelova V, Janousek B, Laporte V, Vyskot B, Mouchiroud D, Negrutiu I, Charlesworth D, Moneger F. 2005. A gradual process of recombination restriction in the evolutionary history of the sex chromosomes in dioecious plants. PLoS Biol 3: e4.
|
31 |
Obeso JR. 2002. The costs of reproduction in plants. New Phytol 155: 321-348.
DOI
|
32 |
Okonkwo HO, Eric EE, Ejizu AN. 2020. Tree-to-Tree Variation of Seed Germination Characteristics in a Garcinia kola (Heckel) Plantation in the Humid Tropical Rainforest. J Agric Food Environ 7: 1-6.
|
33 |
Okonkwo HO, Omokhua GE. 2022. Sexual system, sexual polymorphism and resource partitioning in a Garcinia kola (Heckel) population at Onne, River state Nigeria. J For Sci Environ 7: 49-55.
|
34 |
Richards AJ. 1997. Plant Breeding Systems. 2nd ed. Chapman and Hall, London.
|
35 |
Pangsuban S, Bamroongrugsa N, Kanchanapoom K, Nualsri C. 2007. An evaluation of the sexual system of Garcinia atroviridis L. (Clusiaceae), based on reproductive features. Songklanakarin J Sci Technol 29: 1457-1468.
|
36 |
Richards AJ. 1990a. Studies in Garcinia, dioecious tropical forest trees: agamospermy. Bot J Linn Soc 103: 233-250.
DOI
|
37 |
Richards AJ. 1990b. Studies in Garcinia, dioecious tropical forest trees: the phenology, pollination biology and fertilization of G. hombroniana Pierre. Bot J Linn Soc 103: 251-261.
DOI
|
38 |
Ross MD. 1982. Five Evolutionary Pathways to Subdioecy. Am Nat 119: 297-318.
|
39 |
Sakai AK, Weller SG. 1999. Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants: a review of terminology, biogeographic patterns, ecological correlates, and phylogenetic approaches. In: Gender and Sexual Dimorphism in Flowering Plants (Geber MA, Dawson TE, Delph LF, eds). Springer, New York, pp 1-31.
|
40 |
Sakai S. 1993. Allocation to attractive structures in animal-pollinated flowers. Evolution 47: 1711-1720.
DOI
|
41 |
Sargent RD, Goodwillie C, Kalisz S, Ree RH. 2007. Phylogenetic evidence for a flower size and number trade-off. Am J Bot 94: 2059-2062.
DOI
|
42 |
Sugiyama S, Bazzaz FA. 1998. Size dependence of reproductive allocation: the influence of resource availability, competition and genetic identity. Funct Ecol 12: 280-288.
DOI
|
43 |
Sweeney PW. 2008. Phylogeny and Floral Diversity in the Genus Garcinia (Clusiaceae) and Relatives. Int J Plant Sci 169: 1228-1303.
DOI
|
44 |
Willson MF. 1979. Sexual Selection in Plants. Am Nat 113: 777-790.
DOI
|
45 |
Yakimowski SB, Glaettli M, Barrett SCH. 2011. Floral dimorphism in plant populations with combined versus separate sexes. Ann Bot 108: 765-776.
DOI
|
46 |
Worley AC, Barrett SCH. 2000. Evolution of floral display in Eichhornia paniculata (Pontederiaceae): direct and correlated responses to selection on flower size and number. Evolution 54: 1533-1545.
DOI
|