Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7747/JFES.2021.37.3.226

Analysis of Total Phenolic, Flavonoid Contents, and Antioxidant Capacity Extract from Leaves of Selected Accessions of Two Wild Pear Species, Pyrus pyrifolia and P. ussuriensis  

Yang, Si Woong (Department of Forest Environment System, College of Forest & Environmental Sciences, Kangwon National University)
Lee, Hwa (Department of Forest Environment System, College of Forest & Environmental Sciences, Kangwon National University)
Song, Jae Mo (Gangwon Forest Science Institute)
Choi, Sun Eun (Department of Forest Biomaterials Engineering, College of Forest & Environmental Sciences, Kangwon National University)
Cheong, Eun Ju (Department of Forest Environment System, College of Forest & Environmental Sciences, Kangwon National University)
Publication Information
Journal of Forest and Environmental Science / v.37, no.3, 2021 , pp. 226-234 More about this Journal
Abstract
Two species, P. pyrifolia and P. ussuriensis, of the genus Pyrus native to Korea, are valuable genetic resources that can be used for food, dietary supplement, pharmaceutical, and cosmetics. Bioactive compounds of the plant leaves are the main components that are used for the products. Farmers had cultivated a few individuals from the wild to produce fruits or leaves for traditional remedy or tea; however, bioactive components of their leaves are not tested. We selected some trees from the natural stand that have distinct traits for the improvement program. We investigated the bioassay on the extracts' bioactive compounds and antioxidant capacity from the selected accessions and other accessions, including newly developed cultivars. The contents of the phenolic compounds and flavonoids from the leaf extracts of the selected accessions were higher than the commonly cultivated trees in both species but lower than 'Sanhyang' in P. ussuriensis. The antioxidant capacity was measured using two assay methods, DPPH and ABST. The selected cultivars also had higher inhibitory activity than common trees. The selected accession 'Cultivar 3' in P. pyrifolia had the highest radical scavenging activity than others. Although leaves of the accessions were used only in this study, all three selected individuals have the potential for cultivar in containing high bioactive compounds and antioxidant capacity.
Keywords
Pyrus pyrifolia; Pyrus ussuriensis; wild pear; bioactive compound; antioxidant capacity;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 4  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Luta G, Gherghina E, Balan D, Israel-Roming F. 2020. Bioactive Compounds and Antioxidant Properties of Some Wild Plants with Potential Culinary Uses. Rev Chim 71: 179-184.   DOI
2 Oh Y, Shin H, Kim K, Han H, Kim YK, Kim D. 2015. Researches of pear tree (Pyrus spp.) genomics. J Plant Biotechnol 42: 290-297.   DOI
3 Panche AN, Diwan AD, Chandra SR. 2016. Flavonoids: an overview. J Nutr Sci 5: e47.   DOI
4 Re R, Pellegrini N, Proteggente A, Pannala A, Yang M, Rice-Evans C. 1999. Antioxidant activity applying an improved ABTS radical cation decolorization assay. Free Radic Biol Med 26: 1231-1237.   DOI
5 Shon HK, Lee YS, Park YH, Kim MJ, Lee KA. 2008. Physico-chemical Properties of Gugija (Lycii fructus) Extracts. Korean J Food Cookery Sci 24: 905-911.
6 Van den Berg R, Haenen GRMM, van den Berg H, Bast A. 1999. Applicability of an improved Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC) assay for evaluation of antioxidant capacity measurements of mixtures. Food Chem 66: 511-517.   DOI
7 Wang H, Liu YM, Qi ZM, Wang SY, Liu SX, Li X, Wang HJ, Xia XC. 2013. An overview on natural polysaccharides with antioxidant properties. Curr Med Chem 20: 2899-2913.   DOI
8 Wang M, Li J, Rangarajan M, Shao Y, LaVoie EJ, Huang TC, Ho CT. 1998. Antioxidative Phenolic Compounds from Sage (Salvia officinalis). J Agric Food Chem 46: 4869-4873.   DOI
9 Yahia Y, Benabderrahim MA, Tlili N, Bagues M, Nagaz K. 2020. Bioactive compounds, antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of extracts from different plant parts of two Ziziphus Mill. species. PLoS One 15: e0232599.   DOI
10 Yu TJ. 1989. The Food Guide. Munundang, Seoul, pp 166.
11 Hamzaliglu A, Gokmen V. 2016. Interaction between Bioactive Carbonyl Compounds and Asparagine and Impact on Acrylamide. In: Acrylamide in Food: Analysis, Content and Potential Health Effects (Gokmen V, ed). Academic Pres, London, pp 355-376.
12 Koh A, Choi S, Kim Y, Park G. 2016. Protective Effects of Pyrus pyrifolia NAKAI Leaf Extracts on UVB-induced Toxicity in Human Dermal Fibroblasts. J Soc Cosmet Sci Korea 42: 87-94.   DOI
13 Andersen OM, Jordheim M. 2006. The Anthocyanins. In: Flavonoids: Chemistry, Biochemistry and Applications (Andersen OM, Markham KR, eds). CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 471-551.
14 Awika JM, Rooney LW, Wu X, Prior RL, Cisneros-Zevallos L. 2003. Screening methods to measure antioxidant activity of sorghum (sorghum bicolor) and sorghum products. J Agric Food Chem 51: 6657-6662.   DOI
15 Blois M. 1958. Antioxidant Determinations by the Use of a Stable Free Radical. Nature 181: 1199-1200.   DOI
16 Choi JH, Lee EY, Kim JS, Choi GB, Jung SG, Ham YS, Seo DC, Heo JS. 2006. Physiological Activities According to Cultivars and Parts of Ulsan Pear. Appl Biol Chem 49: 43-48.
17 Moreno MIN, Isla MI, Sampietro AR, Vattuone MA. 2000. Comparison of the free radical-scavenging activity of propolis from several regions of Argentina. J Ethnopharmacol 71: 109-114.   DOI
18 Suzuki K, Suzuki M, Akamatsu H, Matsungaga K. 2002. Allergic contact dermatitis from minoxidil: study of the cross-reaction to minoxidil. Am J Contact Dermat 13: 45-46.
19 Kim JH. 1998. Agriculture Technology Series 34. The Latest Culture of Pear: New Cultivar, New Technology, New Agriculture. Osung Publisher, Seoul, 421 pp.
20 Chojnacki T, Vogtman T. 1984. The occurrence and seasonal distribution of C50-C60-polyprenols and of C100-and similar long-chain polyprenols in leaves of plants. Acta Biochim Pol 31: 115-126.
21 Faccio G. 2020. Plant Complexity and Cosmetic Innovation. iScience 23: 101358.   DOI
22 Jo HJ, Kim JW, Yoon JA, Kim KI, Chung KH, Song BC, An JH. 2014. Antioxidant Activities of Amaranth (Amaranthus spp. L.) Flower Extracts. Korean J Food Nutr 27: 175-182.   DOI
23 Kwon Y, Youn KS. 2017. Antioxidant and Physiological Activities of Hijikia Fusiforme by Extraction Methods. Korean J Food Preserv 24: 631-637.   DOI
24 Kim DS, Choi MH, Shin HJ. 2018. Polyphenol contents and antioxidant activities of domestic bamboo leaves with different extraction solvents. J Adv Eng Technol 11: 7-13.
25 Kim EJ, Choi JY, Yu MR, Kim MY, Lee SH, Lee BH. 2012. Total Polyphenols, Total Flavonoid Contents, and Antioxidant Activity of Korean Natural and Medicinal Plants. Korean J Food Sci Technol 44: 337-342.   DOI
26 Kim H, Kim TH, Jeon B, Bang MH, Kim WJ, Park JW, Chung DK. 2020. Evaluation of the Physiological Activity on the Skin and Identification of the Active Ingredient of Leaf Extract from Sanhyang Sandolbae (Pyrus ussuriensis) as a New Variety. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 49: 35-45.   DOI
27 Lee CE, Kim YH, Lee BG, Lee DH. 2010. Antioxidant Effect of the Fraction Isolated from Pyrus ussuriensis Leaves. J Korean For Soc 99: 885-890.
28 Lee CH, Shin SL, Kim NR, Hwang JK. 2011. Comparison of Antioxidant Effects of Different Korean Pear Species. Korean J Plant Res 24: 253-259.   DOI
29 Lee DY, Lee HS, Jo JH, Yi YW, Kim SJ, Kang K, Kwon TW, Yang SG, Lee IH. 2020. Comparison of Ingredients and Activities of Danggwisoo-san and Jakyakgamcho-tang by Extraction Method. J Korean Med Rehabi 30: 31-39.
30 Lee TB. 2003. Coloured Flora of Korea. Hyangmunsa, Seoul.
31 Lee WC. 1996. Coloured Standard Illustrations of Korean Plants. Academy Book, Seoul, 624 pp.
32 Lee YJ. 2016. Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory response of stem and leaf extracts from Rubus coreanus Miquel. MS thesis. Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea. (in Korean)