Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7747/JFES.2019.35.1.1

Comparison of Frequencies in Order to Estimate of Tree Species Diversity in Caspian Forests of Iran  

Mirzaei, Mehrdad (Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Guilan)
Bahnemiry, Atefeh Karimiyan (Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Guilan)
Abkenar, Kambiz Taheri (Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Guilan)
Publication Information
Journal of Forest and Environmental Science / v.35, no.1, 2019 , pp. 1-5 More about this Journal
Abstract
Species diversity is one of the most important indices that used to evaluate the sustainability of forest communities. In the present study, three variables including number of individuals (frequency of species), basal area and volume of tree species were compared to estimate tree species diversity in broadleaves forests of Iran. Based on systematic random design, 30 plots (circle plot, $1000m^2$) was selected. Type of species, number of species, DBH and height of trees were measured. Simpson (1-D), Hill ($N_2$), Shannon-Wiener (H'), Mc Arthur ($N_1$), Smith-Wilson ($E_{var}$) and Margalef ($R_1$) indices used to estimate tree species diversity. Species diversity was calculated in each plot. ANOVA test showed that there was a significant difference between of three variables used for estimation of species diversity. Number of trees variable has more precision than basal area and volume variables to estimate of species diversity. But Duncan test revealed that there were significant difference between of basal area and volume variables with number of trees. Therefore, basal area and volume variables were selected as more suitable variables in order to estimate of biodiversity indices in northern forests of Iran.
Keywords
biodiversity; Caspian forest; tree species indices; type of data;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Hasenauer H. 2006. Sustainable forest management: growth models for Europe. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
2 Esmaeil Ramaji M, Riazi B, Kaboli M, Payam H. 2011. The study of species diversity of woody plants in Khoshkedaran National Natural Monument. J Sci Tech Nat Res 5: 63-74.
3 Krebs CJ. 1999. Ecological methodology. 2nd edition. Benjamin Cummings, Menlo Park.
4 Lexerod NL, Eid T. 2006. An evaluation of different diameter diversity indices based on criteria related to forest management planning. For Ecol Manag 222: 17-28.   DOI
5 Magurran AE. 2004. Measuring biological diversity. Blackwell Science Ltd, Oxford.
6 Memarian F, Tabbari M, Hosseini SM, Banj Shafiei A. 2007. Comparison of biodiversity in conifer mixed stand with broadleaves mixed stand in Kelardasht area. J Environ Stud 33: 103-108.
7 Moradi Emamgheysi I, Bonyad AE, Mirzaei M, Hassanzad Navroodi I. 2016. Diversity of tree species in protected forests of Ardal’s Chartagh. Zagros For Res 2: 91-99.
8 Motz K, Sterba H, Pommerening A. 2010. Sampling measures of tree diversity. For Ecol Manag 260: 1985-1996.   DOI
9 Aubert M, Bureau F, Alard D, Bardat J. 2004. Effect of tree mixture on the humic epipedon and vegetation diversity in managed beech forests (Normandy, France). Can J For Res 34: 233-248.   DOI
10 Bandeira B, Jamet JL, Jamet D, Ginoux JM. 2013. Mathematical convergences of biodiversity indices. Ecol Indic 29: 522-528.   DOI
11 Danilov R, Ekelund NGA. 1999. The efficiency of seven diversity and one similarity indices based on phytoplankton data for assessing the level of eutrophication in lakes in central Sweden. Sci Total Environ 234: 15-23.   DOI
12 Ebrahimi SS, Pourbabaei H, Potheir D, Omidi A, Torkaman J. 2014. Effect of livestock grazing and human uses on herbaceous species diversity in oriental beech (Fagus orientalis Lipsky) forests, Guilan, Masal, northern Iran. J For Res 25: 455-462.   DOI
13 Pourbabaei H, Abedi T. 2008. Study on stand structure and plant biodiversity in Box tree (Buxus hyrcana Pojark.) site, Kish Khaleh, Talesh, Guilan. Pajouhesh Va Sazandegi 21: 122-128.
14 Pommerening A. 2002. Approaches to quantifying forest structures. Forestry 75: 305-324.   DOI
15 Pommerening A. 2006. Evaluating structural indices by reversing forest structural analysis. For Ecol Manag 224: 266-277.   DOI
16 Pourbabaei H, Dado KH. 2006. Species diversity of woody plants in the district no.1 forests, Kelardasht, Mazandaran province. Iran J Biol 18: 307-322.
17 Pourbabaei H, Abedi T, Zaree A. 2010. Study on stand structure and plant biodiversity in Box tree (Buxus hyrcana Pojark.) site, Anjilbon, Guilan. Iran J Biol 23: 9-17.
18 Pommerening A, Stoyan D. 2006. Edge-correction needs in estimating indices of spatial forest structure. Can J For Res 36: 1723-1739.   DOI
19 Sterba H, Zingg A. 2006. Distance dependent and distance independent description of stand structure. Allg Forst Jagdzg 8: 169-176.
20 Scott WA, Anderson R. 2003. Temporal and spatial variation in carabid assemblages from the United Kingdom Environmental Change Network. Bio Conserv 110: 197-210.   DOI
21 van Strien AJ, Soldaat LL, Gregory RD. 2012. Desirable mathematical properties of indicators for biodiversity change. Ecol Indic 14: 202-208.   DOI
22 Washington HG. 1984. Diversity, biotic and similarity indices: A review with special relevance to aquatic ecosystems. Water Res 18: 653-694.   DOI
23 Aguirre O, Hui G, von Gadow K, Jimenez J. 2003. An analysis of spatial forest structure using neighbourhood-based variables. For Ecol Manage 183: 137-145.   DOI