Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7747/JFES.2018.34.2.108

Allometric Equation for Biomass Determination in Chuqala Natural Forest, Ethiopia: Implication for Climate Change Mitigation  

Balcha, Mecheal Hordofa (Center for Environmental Science, Addis Ababa University)
Soromessa, Teshome (Center for Environmental Science, Addis Ababa University)
Kebede, Dejene (Competitional Science, Addis Ababa University)
Publication Information
Journal of Forest and Environmental Science / v.34, no.2, 2018 , pp. 108-118 More about this Journal
Abstract
Biomass determination of species-specific in forest ecosystem by semi-destructive measures requires the development of allometric equations; predict aboveground biomass observable independent variables such as, Diameter at Breast Height, Height, and Volume are crucial role. There has not been equation of this type in mountain Chuqala natural forest. In this study two species namely, Hypericum revolutum Vahl. & Maesa lanceoleta Forssk. with tree diameter classes (15-20, 20.5-25, and 25.5-35 cm), with the purpose of conducting allometric equations were characterized. Each species assumed considered individually. For the linear model fit the two observed variable DBH, H and V were preferred for the prediction of above ground biomass. The best fitted model choose among the two formed model were identified using Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), and $R^2$ and adjacent $R^2$. Based on this the best fit model for Hypericum revolutum Vahl. was AGB=-681.015+4,494.06 (DBH), and for Maesa lanceoleta Forrsk. was. AGB=-936.96+5,268.92 (DBH).
Keywords
above ground biomass; Chuqala mountain; semi-destructive; total biomass; Hypericum revolutum; Maesa lanceoleta;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Aboal JR, Arevalo JR, Fernandezc A. 2005. Allometric relation- ships of different tree species and stand above ground biomass in the Gomera laurel forest (Canary Islands). J Sci Dire 200: 263-274.
2 Brown S, Gillespie AJR, Lugo AE. 1989. Biomass estimating methods for tropical forests with application to forest inventory data. J For Sci 35: 881-902.
3 Brunig ER. 1983. Structure and growth. In: Tropical rain forest ecosystems: structure and function (Golley FB, ed). Elsevier Scientific Pub., New York, pp 44-75.
4 Canadell JG, Raupach MR. 2008. Managing forests for climate change mitigation. Science 320: 1456-7.   DOI
5 Cannell MGR. 1984. Wood biomass of forest stands. J For Ecol Manage 8: 299-312.   DOI
6 Chave J, Andalo C, Brown S, Cairns MA, Chambers JQ, Eamus D, Folster H, Fromard F, Higuchi N, Kira T, Lescure JP, Nelson BW, Ogawa H, Puig H, Riera B, Yamakura T. 2005. Tree allometry and improved estimation of carbon stocks and balance in tropical forests. Oecologia 145: 87-99.   DOI
7 Henry M, Besnard A, Asnate WA, Eshun J, Adu-Bredu S, Valentini R, Bernoux M, Saint-Andre L. 2010. Wood density, phytomass variations within and among trees, and allometric equations in a tropical rainforest of Africa. J For Ecol Manage 260: 1375-1388.   DOI
8 Chave J, Condit R, Aguilar S, Hernandez A, Lao S, Perez R. 2004. Error propagation and scaling for tropical forest biomass estimates. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 359: 409-420.   DOI
9 Dundley NS, Fownes JH. 1992. Preliminary biomass equation for eight species of fast-growing tropical forest. J Trop For Sci 5: 68-73.
10 Gibbs HK, Brown S, Nile JO, Foley JA. 2007. Monitoring and estimating tropical forest carbons stocks: making REDD a reality. Environ Res Lett 2: 045023.   DOI
11 Henry M, Picard N, Trotta C, Monlay R, Valentini R, Bernoux M, Saint-Andre L. 2011. Estimating tree biomass of sub-Saharan African Forests: a review of available equations. Silva Fennica 45: 477-569.
12 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2006. IPCC Guide lines for National Greenhouse Gas inventories. Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories program, Eggleston HS, Buenidias L, Miwak K, Ngara T, Tanabek K, eds. Published: IGES, Japan.
13 Kangas A, Maltamo M. 2006. Forest inventory, Methodology and Applications. J Man For Eco 10: 179-194.
14 Ketterings QM, Coe R, van Noordwijk M, Ambagau Y, Palm CA. 2001. Reducing uncertainty in the use of allometric biomass equations for predicting above-ground tree biomass in mixed secondary forests. J For Ecol Manag 146: 199-209.   DOI
15 Peltier R, Forkong CN, Ntoupka M, Manlay R, Henry M, Morillon V. 2007. Evaluations Du stock de cardnet dela. Productivities enboisd'un parca karites duNord- Cameroun Evaluation of carbon stocks and Fuel wood productivity. In Ashea Zone in Norhten Cameroun.
16 Macdicken KG. 1997. A guide to monitoring carbon storage in forest and agro- forest projects. In: Forest carbon Monitoring program. Winrock International Institute for Agricultural Development, Arlington, Viriginia.
17 Mcwalalliam ALC, Roberts JM, Carbal OMR, Leitao MVBR, de Costa ACL, Maitelli GT, Zamparoni CAGP. 1993. Leaf area index and above-ground biomass of terrafirme rain forest and adjacent clearings in Amazonia. J Funct Ecol 15: 310-317.
18 Mukul SA, Herbohn J, Firn J. 2016. Tropical secondary forests regenerating after shifting cultivation in the Philippines uplands are important carbon sinks. Sci Rep 6: 22483.   DOI
19 Navar J, Najera J, Jurado E. 2002. Biomass estimation equations in the Tamaulipan thornscrub of northeastern Mexico. J Arid Environ 52: 167-179.   DOI
20 Pearson TRH, Brown SL, Birdsey RA. 2007. Measurement guideline for the sequestrations of forest carbon. Unite state Department of Agricultural (UADA) Forest Service. General Technical Report NRS-18.
21 Singh V, Tewari A, Kushwaha SPS, Dadhwal VK. 2011. Formulating allometric equations for estimating biomass and carbon stock in small diameter trees. For Ecol Manage 261: 1945-1949.   DOI
22 Picard N, Saint-Andre L, Henry M. 2012. Manual for building tree Allometric equations: From the field to prediction, Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. Center de cooperation international en Recherche Agronomies.
23 Rai SN, Proctor J. 1986. Ecological studies on four forests in Kar- nataka, India: I. environment, structure, floristic and Biomass. J Ecol 74: 439-454.   DOI
24 Rai SN. 1981. Productivity of tropical rain forests of Karnataka. PhD thesis. University of Bombay, India, pp 100-110.
25 Whittaker RH, Likes GE. 1975. The biosphere and man. In: Primary productivity of the biosphere (Lieth H, Whittaker RH, eds). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, pp 305-328.
26 Unite Nation Frame work Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). 1998. Kyoto protocol to the United Nations Framework convention on climate change. Kyoto.
27 United Nation Frame work Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). 2009. Draft decision [CP.15]. Methodological guidance for activities relating to reducing emission from defor- estation and forest degradation and the role of conservation, sus- tainable management forests and enhancement of forest carbon stocks in developing countries. Subsidiary body for Scientific and technological advice, Copenhagen.
28 Whitemore TC, Burnham CP. 1984. Tropical rain forest of the far east. 2nd ed. Oxford University press, Oxford, pp 112-113.