1 |
Bhahurothu P. 2011. Impact of timber sale characteristics on pine sawtimber prices in non-industrial private forests of southern United States: Implications of forest fragmentation. MS thesis. The University of Gerogia, Athens.
|
2 |
Boardman A, Greenberg DH, Vining AR, Weimer DL. 2011. Cost-benefit analysis: Concepts and practice. 4th ed. New Jersey, Prentice Hall.
|
3 |
Buongiorno J, Young T. 1984. Statistical appraisal of timber with an application to the Chequamegon National Forest. North J Appl For 1: 72-76.
|
4 |
Dunn MA, Dubois MR. 1999. Determining econometric relationships between timber sale notice provisions and high bids received on timber offerings from the Alabama department of conservation/state lands division, Timberlands investments: Improving the odds, Proceedings of the 1999 Southern Forest Economics Workshop. Mississippi State University, Biloxi, Mississippi, pp 83-90.
|
5 |
Fiery M. 2012. Pine Stumpage Price Trends in the US South, Forest2Market. Charlotte, North Carolina. http://www.forest2market.com/blog/Pine-Stumpage-Price-Trends-in-the-US-South.
|
6 |
Haight RG, Holmes TP. 1991. Stochastic price models and optimal tree cutting: results for loblolly pine. Nat Resour Model 5: 423-443.
DOI
|
7 |
Hensyl CH. 2005. Impacts of land and ownership characteristics on the stumpage prices for Virginia's nonindustrial forests. MS thesis. Department of Forestry, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia.
|
8 |
Hubbard WG, Abt RC. 1989. The effect of timber sale assistance on returns to landowners. Resource Management and Optimization 6: 225-234.
|
9 |
Kilgore M, Brown R, Blinn C, Coggins J, Pfender C. 2010. A national review of state timber sale programs and an analysis of factors influencing Minnesota state stumpage prices. A Report to the Minnesota Forest Resources Council, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota.
|
10 |
Ladd GW, Martini MB. 1976. Prices and demand for input characteristics. Am J Agr Econ 58: 21-30.
DOI
|
11 |
Leefers LA, Potter-Witter K. 2006. Timber sale characteristics and competition for public lands stumpage: a case study from the Lake States. Forest Sci 52: 460-467.
|
12 |
Puttock GD, Meilke KD, Prescott DM. 1990. Stumpage prices in southwestern Ontario: a hedonic function approach. Forest Sci 36: 1119-1132.
|
13 |
Mei B, Clutter M, Harris T. 2010. Modeling and forecasting pine sawtimber stumpage prices in the US South by various time series models. Can J Forest Res 40: 1506-1516.
DOI
|
14 |
Munn IA, Palmquist RB. 1997. Estimating hedonic price equations for a timber stumpage market using stochastic frontier estimation procedures. Can J Forest Res 27: 1276-1280.
DOI
|
15 |
Newman DH. 1987. An econometric analysis of the southern softwood stumpage market: 1950-1980. Forest Sci 33: 932-945.
|
16 |
Rosen S. 1974. Hedonic prices and implicit markets: Product differentiation in pure competition. J Polit Econ 82: 34-55.
DOI
|
17 |
Sun C, Kinnucan HW. 2001. Economic Impact of environmental regulations on southern softwood stumpage markets: A reappraisal. South J Appl For 25: 108-115.
|
18 |
Sydor T, Mendell BC. 2008. Transaction evidence analysis: Stumpage prices and risk in central Georgia. Can J Forest Res 38: 239-246.
DOI
|
19 |
Timber Mart-South (TMS). 2009. Stumpage detail report, 1st quarter 2009. Norris Foundation, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia.
|
20 |
Timber Mart-South (TMS). Various years. Norris Foundation, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia. http://www.timbermart-south.com
|
21 |
U.S. Forest Service. 1982. An analysis of the timber situation in the United States, 1952-2030. USDA Forest Service, Washington Office, Washington, DC. Forest Research Report 22. pp 499.
|
22 |
Vasievich JM. 1980. Costs of hazard-reduction burning on southern national forests. South J Appl For 4: 12-15.
|
23 |
Wagner JE, Cubbage FW, Holmes TP. 1994. Estimated economic impacts of environmental regulations on southern softwood stumpage markets. South J Appl For 18: 156-162.
|